View Poll Results: How much credit should the catcher get on a strikeout?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • None

    6 30.00%
  • 2%

    1 5.00%
  • 5%

    2 10.00%
  • 10%

    2 10.00%
  • 15%

    2 10.00%
  • 20%

    1 5.00%
  • 25%

    5 25.00%
  • 35%

    1 5.00%
  • 50%

    0 0%
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Credit the Catcher for a Strikeout?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On the ice blue line of insanity.
    Posts
    3,437

    Credit the Catcher for a Strikeout?

    On a strikeout, how much credit should go to the catcher instead of the pitcher (for calling the pitch, framing the pitch, etc.)?
    Clay Dreslough, Sports Mogul Inc.
    cjd at sportsmogul dot com / blog / twitter

    Forum Rules
    Bug reports and roster corrections: support@sportsmogul.com

  2. #2
    dabruinss Guest
    i think the catcher is very valuable to a pitching staff. but i still think about 25% is all he should get

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    3
    honestly, i think that there should be a number for ERA while he catches....

    not a strike out...the catcher is not throwing the ball....also maybe a W-L record too...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    3
    also the catcher most of the time is looking to get an out, and not a strike out....like low and away could turn into a weak grounder to 1b (right handed batter) and vice versa.

  5. #5
    SFSteveG Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by boomboom
    honestly, i think that there should be a number for ERA while he catches....

    not a strike out...the catcher is not throwing the ball....also maybe a W-L record too...
    I like the era and W-L stat for the catcher. I voted for 20 because even if he sets the pitch perfectly the pitcher still controls weather he hits the spot.

  6. #6
    robinhoodnik Guest
    Just give them a strikeouts per batters faced stat? How about also throwing in pitches per batter faced also. It'd maybe show who calls a better game by the pitch count. Pitches per out also could help. Which is better, a catcher who can get you through a whole game with a low pitch count, or a catcher who can get you 9 or 10 strikeouts, in 120 or 130 pitches, in 7 or 8 innings? If you have a weak bullpen I'd take the guy who can keep the good starter in the game longer if my bullpen is not good. Just a suggestion, not meant as sarcasm or criticism.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    134
    I really like the W-L idea. It would be similar to in football how a quarterback gets a W-L record...This would show a catcher effectiveness. The only downside is that a catcher with a great staff has a better shot. i.e. Michael Barrett and AJ Pierzynski will probably have a better shot at wins than Toby Hall.
    Even in the tough NL East, the Braves will win their 15th straight division title...and everybody knows it!!!

  8. #8
    Scorey1974 Guest
    I don't think the W-L stat for catchers is going to prove much. A bad catcher on a very good team is going to have a great W-L record and vice versa. You're going to have to take a pitchers K/9 with each catcher he's been with and see how his numbers change as he's been with different catchers to get any kind of accurate reflection of how much that particular catcher affects the pitcher's success.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    134
    good point, that is one of the problems. but you could tell something, i think Jason Varitek is better at managing a game than a lot of the catchers in the league. you could get an accurate reading for that...
    Even in the tough NL East, the Braves will win their 15th straight division title...and everybody knows it!!!

  10. #10
    dabruinss Guest
    the won lost idea is the best so far. clay you should act on this 1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •