Screenshots of pitchers viewed under "100 scouting" vs. Commissioner mode. Overall, among 34 pitchers, I counted 9 cases where the purported "+/- 1" scouting over-rated an overall or peak rating, with a difference of 1 to 3 points. But there were 38 under-ratings, all the way up to 10 points! (See Matt Cassels.) No wonder the AI does such as lousy job deciding when to promote players. Remember, the average team has far worse scouting than this. This has been broken for years, and seems like a major flaw for a "GM"-focused game. Please vote and also rate this thread. This is from the current Beta and so I've e-mailed Clay, but I reported this years ago and nothing happened -- am I the only one who cares?



Reply With Quote

