Re: Jay Bruce signed for 6 years, $51 million, $12 millon club option for 7th year

Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
That's still not going to set any MLB team back a few years.
Plus, while you'll be in the "more expensive" years, there's also inflation to account for.
And, for these types of players and contracts, the "back end" of their deal will be when they're 27-29. The risk is really, really minimal compared to free agent contracts, which are you usually similar in length yet handed out to players who are ALREADY 29.
And, like you said, the risk is also significantly higher with pitchers. These types of deals for position players nearly always produce surplus value for the team.
Any small market team that is eating 10+ mil in payroll is going to be set back. That doesn't mean it kills them or prevents them from competing or anything drastic like that, but it's definitely going to be set back to some degree. I also don't know if inflation really has a notable impact.
That doesn't keep it from being a good idea though. Generally you're only doing it for extremely talented players like Bruce or Longoria, and like you said, it's during years where it's perfectly reasonable to expect improvement or maintained production.
Illini.
Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...