View Poll Results: Do you support Omar getting number 11 in Chicago?

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Absolutely yes

    3 12.50%
  • I lean toward yes

    9 37.50%
  • I lean toward no

    6 25.00%
  • Absolutely not

    6 25.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    4,067

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    It is a number. I don't care. And Luis is happy with it. So yeah...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    we have a perfectly even split right now

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    Well, Kenny said he voted before he read and would have changed his vote, so not quite

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Uptown Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,433

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    I lean toward "yes". While I do think that a number should remain retired once a team retires it, since Aparicio supports it, Vizquel is a potential Hall of Famer, and they share a mutual respect for one another I'm fine with it. If it was some random rookie player who insisted on the number or something like that, I'd likely be against it, and I imagine Aparicio would be as well.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    Surprised this hasn't been brought up on here yet.


    What do you guys think of it?

    Is it appropriate? Should it be allowed?

    Do you support it?
    If by "should it be allowed?" you mean should MLB have a rule against "unretiring" a number, then I say there definately shouldn't be such a rule. Each team makes its own decision about what numbers to retire*; if they change their mind, it would normally be kind of tacky and disrespectful (though in a case like this, where Aparicio is cool with it, it's a little bit different), but there shouldn't be any rule against it.

    *Except that there's one number that's retired thoughout major league baseball.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    503

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    When a number is retired, whose number is it? If it is the players (alive ones) number, then they should have a say. If it is the teams, then this is stupid on Chicago's part. Does this make sense to anybody else?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Savoy, IL
    Posts
    7,662

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    I find the fact that Aparicio signed off on it to be more or less irrelevant here.

    I mean, it's nice that they asked him and he agreed. They'd be really douchey if they didn't ask Aparicio.

    I just think that if you're going to unretire a number to accommodate a guy who is coming there at the very end of his career, after he had a hall of fame career elsewhere, it diminishes the idea of retiring numbers in general. If that's the way you want it to be, fine, don't retire the number, just honor it but still give it out.
    Illini.

    Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    503

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    Quote Originally Posted by haveacigar View Post
    I find the fact that Aparicio signed off on it to be more or less irrelevant here.

    I mean, it's nice that they asked him and he agreed. They'd be really douchey if they didn't ask Aparicio.

    I just think that if you're going to unretire a number to accommodate a guy who is coming there at the very end of his career, after he had a hall of fame career elsewhere, it diminishes the idea of retiring numbers in general. If that's the way you want it to be, fine, don't retire the number, just honor it but still give it out.
    Very well put. It isn't like Omar will go down as a White Sox great or anything.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    When I first saw this story break this afternoon, the only thing I could think was how did the conversation even come up? And how did management think this would blow over?

    Generally, in management, you move forward on a decision when you are very confident in the ripple effect it will create. I don't believe that everyone in the front office was comfortable with this when it was decided upon. In my humble experience, you don't do it, regardless if Aparacio agrees, simply because you don't do something unless you are positive it is a good, sound choice.

    In some aspects, it's the players number, and in some other aspects, it's the team. Either way, the team can do whatever they want, so long as they have the players consent. If Omar was actually Aparacio's blood son, then it would be pretty cool for example. But this sort of just seems 'cheap' to me. It is supposed to be worn in tribute all year long....but still.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    4,067

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    When I first saw this story break this afternoon, the only thing I could think was how did the conversation even come up? And how did management think this would blow over?

    Generally, in management, you move forward on a decision when you are very confident in the ripple effect it will create. I don't believe that everyone in the front office was comfortable with this when it was decided upon. In my humble experience, you don't do it, regardless if Aparacio agrees, simply because you don't do something unless you are positive it is a good, sound choice.

    In some aspects, it's the players number, and in some other aspects, it's the team. Either way, the team can do whatever they want, so long as they have the players consent. If Omar was actually Aparacio's blood son, then it would be pretty cool for example. But this sort of just seems 'cheap' to me. It is supposed to be worn in tribute all year long....but still.
    Has anyone else considered that maybe it was Aparacio's idea? He could have been excited that Omar was coming, and told the White Sox he could use the number maybe? Just a thought

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    Very possible.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    1,531

    Re: Omar and Aparacio (sp?)

    Reminds me when Bruce wanted too wear number #80 in SF. Rice said he was Ok with it, but SF still said no. That was the right move.A number is retired it shouldn't be worn.
    Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
    Abraham Lincoln

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •