Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Required reading regarding chemistry

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Fantastic article, several things I would have quoted, but then this would be a very long comment.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Olympia, Washington
    Posts
    1,676

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Hmmm.
    For the most part true....but how the hell do you explain the Kirk Gibson led Dodgers beating the steroid Bay Area bombers with a severely lacking offense?
    But considering over a 162 regular season, it does seem chemistry doesn't really put too much effect (unless of course you gotta bunch of overpaid talent who just basically gives up...which in that case they still would win games.)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by reflections View Post
    Hmmm.
    For the most part true....but how the hell do you explain the Kirk Gibson led Dodgers beating the steroid Bay Area bombers with a severely lacking offense?
    Excellent pitching.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Chemistry is imaginary. It's only about stats.
    ]

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Chemistry is imaginary. It's only about stats.
    Clearly, you didn't read.

    As expected.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    I started it.

    Fill me in.
    ]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,583

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Fill me in.


    Don't tempt him.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    3

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Thank you HGM, great read.... I haven't gone to Lookout landing in quite a while. I mostly read UssMariner.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by boomboom View Post
    Thank you HGM, great read.... I haven't gone to Lookout landing in quite a while. I mostly read UssMariner.
    You should read LL. Dave has been slacking this off-season

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    chemistry is imaginary. It's only about stats.
    h2o

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,583

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    h2o
    Gatorade

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    I started it.

    Fill me in.
    Do you get tired of sucking at life, or is it kind of a persistence thing where you try and suck as much as possible and don't stop until you achieve your goal?
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    3

    Re: Required reading regarding chemistry

    Quote Originally Posted by 200tang View Post
    You should read LL. Dave has been slacking this off-season
    i know... I always felt thou Lookout landing was second class to USSmariner...but after looking a few blog post...seems the quality has gotten better. ALso worth to note, the person who posted this was not an admin of the site nor author..it was in the fanpost section.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •