Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Tang do you have those updated HOF vote totals

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Tang do you have those updated HOF vote totals

    I remember you posted them a while back, the site with all of the ballots that writers had posted added up
    ]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: Tang do you have those updated HOF vote totals

    http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/...When:19:47:00Z

    % Leaderboard after 101 Full Ballots…

    89.1 - Alomar
    81.2 - Dawson
    89.2 - Blyleven
    56.4 - Larkin
    59.5 - J. Morris
    42.6 - T. Raines
    40.6 - Edgar
    38.6 - Lee Smith
    34.7 - McGwire
    25.7 - Trammell
    20.8 - McGriff
    9.9 - D. Murphy
    8.9 - Parker
    7.9 - Baines
    5.9 - Mattingly
    Top Partial Ballot Leaders… (126 Full/Partials)

    96 - Alomar
    91 - Dawson
    85 - Blyleven
    And mega-tnx to Rene` on the twitter feeds.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Tang do you have those updated HOF vote totals

    I think that 89.2 for Blyleven is a typo.

    I think it's safe to say Alomar is a lock. Dawson is likely, and Blyleven has a good chance. Larkin will unfortunately have to wait until (hopefully) next year, while Trammell, McGwire and Raines are too far off for their resumes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,438

    Re: Tang do you have those updated HOF vote totals

    Edgar won't get in either.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: Tang do you have those updated HOF vote totals

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I think that 89.2 for Blyleven is a typo.
    Probably 79, or they just put it in the wrong place.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pangea
    Posts
    6,795

    Re: Tang do you have those updated HOF vote totals

    Ya it's 79, they fixed it online
    Quote Originally Posted by President View Post
    For some reason I thought rockies was a big black guy.

    I was wrong.
    Back at this dynasty thing again: Resurrecting The Rockies: 2001 Onward

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •