Bay or Halliday
Bay
Halliday
= good
= bad
Opps...Holliday
I'd rather have Holliday over Bay, even though Holliday's deal is shorter, I would still rather have Matt.
And I feel like Bay was overpaid annually, not Matt.
very true....but I believe Bay won't do **** in New York, while I believe Matt will continue to be a top 20 offensive force for another 4 years at least.
making his contract worth carrying the last couple of years even if he performs under value.
Fili...keep this thread saved, and we'll look in 4 years.
"Baseball statistics are a lot like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything."-Toby Harrah
"It's hard to look pissed off eating Apple Jacks."-Sh*t my Dad Says
"Baseball statistics are a lot like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything."-Toby Harrah
"It's hard to look pissed off eating Apple Jacks."-Sh*t my Dad Says
i think whatever park effect Bay got from Fenway will be equalized by far worse NL pitching. He won't hit the HR's in that massive Mets stadium, but i think he'll be a very productive bat.
Bay signing is a lot better.
]
y, though, support your opinion pwease
I really hate the Bay signing because of the years and HAVING to play him in the field because you're in the NL. However, I don't like the Holliday one much either. Mainly because of years, but it's not a terrible contract by any means. Just seems like it's a lot of years for someone who had no other suitors.
we were contending with daniel murphy dropping flyers left and right jason bay can't be much worse