Yes. It'd increase the "haves" of the owners and the "have nots" of the players.Originally Posted by reflections
o
Yes. It'd increase the "haves" of the owners and the "have nots" of the players.
Registered User
That would depend on how the cap was structured. A cap like the NHL, which defines a share of league revenues that are allocated to player salaries may not have this effect - while still improving competitive balance.
Patron Saint of Pitchers
Re: In pro sports should a % of players salaries be tied to wining?
Only about 25%...the remainder should go towards his dining; women; and song.
Oh...I see...it's a typo...I guess you meant "A player's whining"...
in that case, grant him all that Scott Boras asks for!
"Whate'er should be our Zodiac's star
We all are born to make or mar.
To each is gi'en a bag of tools
Some mentors, and a set of rules:
And each must carve, ere life has flown,
A stumbling block, or a stepping-stone"
(Author unknown)
Generation 35.
"Spikes" The cleats on baseball boots
"Spikes" On which newspaper editors impale copy for future reference, or ultimate destruction.
^Returned 4um Genius^
I thought the thread meant wining players and if they wine or act out they lose money
Some call me Mr.Biggles
:di thought the thread meant wining players and if they wine or act out they lose money
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are .
Master of Ale!
I'm sorry, but describing any athlete making millions of bucks as a 'has not' is patently ridiculous.
o
A salary cap would suppress the salaries of the players and increase the wealth of the owners. Wasn't meant to imply that any athlete is a "has not." I just used the same phrases he did.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote