What does it mean when we say a free agent was offered arbitration? When a team offers arbitration to one of its own free agents, it is offering the player a 2010 contract at a to-be-determined salary. Last year, out of 24 such offers, only two players (Darren Oliver and David Weathers) accepted.
One reason "offering arbitration" to free agents is confusing is that the actual process of arbitration rarely comes into play. Even with Oliver and Weathers last year, the sides agreed on 2010 salaries without arbitration hearings. In an arbitration hearing, a third-party panel must choose between one salary figure submitted by the team and another submitted by the player. These hearings only take place if the sides cannot agree on a salary. Clearing up a common error: if a free agent accepts arbitration, the team and the player can submit any salary figure they want.
If most free agents turn down arbitration offers, why do we care? Turning down an arbitration offer makes draft pick compensation possible for the team losing the free agent. Free agents can be classified as Type A, B, or nothing. Check our list to see the current designations, and click here to see the stats the Elias Sports Bureau uses to assign them.
Shortstop Marco Scutaro will be our example of a Type A free agent. Say the Blue Jays offer him arbitration, and he turns it down because he feels he can do better than a one-year contract if he hits the open market. Say also that the Red Sox sign Scutaro, and do not sign any other Type A free agents. In this case, the Blue Jays are given Boston's #29 pick in the June 2010 draft as well as a pick in a supplemental round that takes place after the first round. It's important to note that the supplemental pick is squeezed into the draft but it does not come from the Red Sox. Therefore, the Sox only surrendered one pick to sign Scutaro, even though the Blue Jays received two.
In the Scutaro example, the Blue Jays were given Boston's first-round draft pick. With Type A free agent draft pick compensation, only first-round picks outside of the top 15 are eligible to be taken by another team. The first 15 picks are protected. In those cases, the team gives up its second-round pick. For example, if the Astros sign Scutaro, the Blue Jays get their second-round (#41) pick rather than their protected first-round (#8) pick. Here's the 2010 draft order; note that the first 16 picks are protected next year because the Rangers will receive a compensatory pick for failing to sign Matt Purke.
Now, if one team signs multiple Type As from other teams, as the Yankees did last year, draft pick compensation gets muddier. Click here to read up on that.
We'll use outfielder Marlon Byrd as our Type B example. Say the Rangers offer him arbitration and he turns it down in search of a better contract. Say also that the Cubs sign Byrd. The Cubs do not give a draft pick to the Rangers. The Rangers do gain a draft pick - it is squeezed into the supplemental round. Therefore, signing a Type A free agent who was offered and turned down arbitration costs one draft pick, but signing such a Type B does not. Players who were not offered arbitration do not have draft pick compensation. Same goes for players who were designated neither A nor B.
Another cause for confusion: we have a different concept that also uses the word "arbitration." When we say Felix Hernandez is arbitration-eligible, we mean that he has between two-plus and five-plus years of service time, and therefore has some say in his salary. Hernandez is under the Mariners' control. The only question is what they will pay him next year, and that's the one similarity with free agent compensation. Felix and the Mariners each submit salary figures, and if they can't agree an arbitration panel must choose one.
Upcoming deadlines: on December 1st (by 11pm CST), we'll learn whether teams offer arbitration to their free agents. Expect 20-25 offers. By December 7th, those 20-25 players must choose whether to accept. Expect only a handful to accept. Those who accept are no longer free agents.
The unrelated non-tender deadline is December 12th. That is when teams decide whether to tender a contract to arbitration-eligible players. These players have fewer than six years of service time, and are under team control for 2010 if the team wants them. If not, the players are non-tendered and become free agents. We'll be adding many names to the free agent list on December 12th.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Jeffy25
