Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: Pedroia to SS

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by gosensgo101 View Post
    Both Pedroia and Hill were shortstops until they reached the big leagues. As long as they have the arm, they would adapt quickly to the rest of the quirks of being a shortstop instead of a second baseman.
    You have no way of knowing they will adept quickly. Schumaker was an IF when he came up but it still took him almost the entire year to adapt and even then it was one of the rare occurrences and moving to 2B which isn't anywhere near as tough as SS.

    If you want to think it's easy because he played it 5 years ago and has a strong arm then go ahead, but it's not.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by haveacigar View Post
    The upgrade wouldn't be Pedroia -> Phillips. The upgrade would be whatever bum plays SS -> Phillips, because the lineup would still have Pedroia in it. And I'm betting SS -> Phillips would be way more than marginal (especially if it's Alex Gonzalez)
    i don't think phillips is that great an offensive player, and there is potentially a significant downgrade defensively. phillips may hit some HR's but has horrible OBP. a little offense for possibly a big downgrade defensively, no thanks. Also, is phillips even a FA, or does he have to be traded for? finally, moving positions OFTEN effects a players offense as they adjust to a new position. The team can't afford a down year offensively from Pedroia.

    I don't see any real benefit from this, unless you were to tell me they had a trade lined up for an Utley, or a significant 2B offensively & defensively.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by gosensgo101 View Post
    Both Pedroia and Hill were shortstops until they reached the big leagues. As long as they have the arm, they would adapt quickly to the rest of the quirks of being a shortstop instead of a second baseman.
    and Pedroia was moved because the team felt he didn't have what was necessary defensively at SS. at least I recall hearing that. I see no other reason to move him...its not as if the Sox had a SS at the major level taht was a mainstay. They dealt Nomar in one of Pedey's first years in the minors.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    and Pedroia was moved because the team felt he didn't have what was necessary defensively at SS. at least I recall hearing that. I see no other reason to move him...its not as if the Sox had a SS at the major level taht was a mainstay. They dealt Nomar in one of Pedey's first years in the minors.
    They also had no one to play 2B. The only other 2B on the roster at the time was Alex Cora (woo-f'ing-hoo for that one), and IIRC they had just signed Julio Lugo to play SS, and that was supposed to be a good signing for the offense.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    15,623

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Potentially, it wouldn't be Brandon Phillips the Sox would be replacing 2B with. Orlando Hudson is a decent defender who can hit for a decent average (at least better then the bums at SS). Or hell Placido Polanco also.

    Though O-Dawg is 32 next season it could potentially be a better move to go into the market looking for a position that has a plethora of decent players then playing the Marco Scutaro sweepstakes and potentially losing out on him.

    Pedroia moving to SS we won't know if it will work until next year, but if the Sox can convince him and will take the risk...I think it pans out better.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Savoy, IL
    Posts
    7,662

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    i don't think phillips is that great an offensive player, and there is potentially a significant downgrade defensively. phillips may hit some HR's but has horrible OBP. a little offense for possibly a big downgrade defensively, no thanks. Also, is phillips even a FA, or does he have to be traded for? finally, moving positions OFTEN effects a players offense as they adjust to a new position. The team can't afford a down year offensively from Pedroia.

    I don't see any real benefit from this, unless you were to tell me they had a trade lined up for an Utley, or a significant 2B offensively & defensively.
    All valid points.
    Illini.

    Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Uptown Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,433

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    wasn't one of the reasons he was moved to 2B because of his poor defense at SS in the minors? i don't know if it was his fielding or range, but i always thought there was something they didn't like about him at SS. If i'm not mistaken, didn't he play some at SS during one of the past two spring trainings, and Tito wasn't very happy with it? Again, not sure.
    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    and Pedroia was moved because the team felt he didn't have what was necessary defensively at SS. at least I recall hearing that. I see no other reason to move him...its not as if the Sox had a SS at the major level taht was a mainstay. They dealt Nomar in one of Pedey's first years in the minors.
    In the ESPN article, Pedroia mentioned that he weighed more in spring training years back from excessive weight training and that had an impact on his poor performance at shortstop.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    396

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    wasn't one of the reasons he was moved to 2B because of his poor defense at SS in the minors? i don't know if it was his fielding or range, but i always thought there was something they didn't like about him at SS. If i'm not mistaken, didn't he play some at SS during one of the past two spring trainings, and Tito wasn't very happy with it? Again, not sure.

    i don't see a real benefit personally. unless they have a 2B in mind that would be a big upgrade, i don't see how a potential downgrade defensively from the move can make up for a marginal offensive upgrade in a Brandon Phillips. I just don't see how it makes sense.
    he moved to 2B because they had Hanley

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by Ninetyfourgoali View Post
    he moved to 2B because they had Hanley
    Originally, yes, but later on after they had traded Hanley I'm pretty sure it had more to do with the signing of Lugo and the fact that they had no one else to play 2B.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    5,684

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by 200tang View Post
    You have no way of knowing they will adept quickly. Schumaker was an IF when he came up but it still took him almost the entire year to adapt and even then it was one of the rare occurrences and moving to 2B which isn't anywhere near as tough as SS.

    If you want to think it's easy because he played it 5 years ago and has a strong arm then go ahead, but it's not.
    OF to 2B is a whole lot harder to get used to than 2B to SS. Not even in the same conversation.
    Active Dynasty
    Meeting Success: A New Regime - Follow us as etothep chronicles me and eddie's efforts to bring a championship back to Queens

    Paused Dynasties
    The Goose continues the Hawk's battle for Capital Hill
    Une Rève Réaliser: Les Expos de Montréal (1969-)

    Retired Dynasties
    The San Diego Padres, into a Friar Destiny (with Jeffy25 and Ragecage)
    A New Era Takes Flight - The 2008 Toronto Blue Jays
    The Blue Birds: A new Era

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    My general take is that if a guy is moved from one position to a less demanding position, there's probably a reason for that, and I don't see much value in moving him back. The exception would be in the situation where a team already has a great player (or a guy that they think is great) at the more demanding position, and now that guy has retired/gotten hurt/left as a free agent/been traded.

    Moving to Pedroia specifically, well, while I think that maybe a lot of people would consider me one of the more hardcore stats guys, along with HGM, when you're considering moving a player to a different position is one of the situations where you absolutely don't want to rely on stats--you definately have to watch him in action a lot to get any feel for how he might do, and I haven't seen Pedroia enough to have a solid opinion.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    5,684

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by dps View Post
    My general take is that if a guy is moved from one position to a less demanding position, there's probably a reason for that, and I don't see much value in moving him back. The exception would be in the situation where a team already has a great player (or a guy that they think is great) at the more demanding position, and now that guy has retired/gotten hurt/left as a free agent/been traded.

    Moving to Pedroia specifically, well, while I think that maybe a lot of people would consider me one of the more hardcore stats guys, along with HGM, when you're considering moving a player to a different position is one of the situations where you absolutely don't want to rely on stats--you definately have to watch him in action a lot to get any feel for how he might do, and I haven't seen Pedroia enough to have a solid opinion.
    I belive the reason was 'Hanley's a better fielder'. Its like the Jeter/Rodriguez situation (for arguments sake, lets assume that they were both good fielding shortstops when A-Rod was traded to the Yankees). Just because the player moves out of position, doesn't mean he's incapable of playing it, it just means the other guy is better (or hugely overrated). He's not going to lose that in a couple years.
    Active Dynasty
    Meeting Success: A New Regime - Follow us as etothep chronicles me and eddie's efforts to bring a championship back to Queens

    Paused Dynasties
    The Goose continues the Hawk's battle for Capital Hill
    Une Rève Réaliser: Les Expos de Montréal (1969-)

    Retired Dynasties
    The San Diego Padres, into a Friar Destiny (with Jeffy25 and Ragecage)
    A New Era Takes Flight - The 2008 Toronto Blue Jays
    The Blue Birds: A new Era

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by gosensgo101 View Post
    OF to 2B is a whole lot harder to get used to than 2B to SS. Not even in the same conversation.
    It's a more unique one, yes, but 2B is hands down the easier position. If you think 2B and SS are essentially the same then you really don't grasp how different the two positions are.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,210

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by 200tang View Post
    It's a more unique one, yes, but 2B is hands down the easier position. If you think 2B and SS are essentially the same then you really don't grasp how different the two positions are.
    The two positions are drastically different. I definately don't think it will be an easy transition, but I think it would be workable. I would only want this to happen if there is a significant addition at second base. Don't want any old shmuck.
    Ready for Offseason rumors and trade talk!

    Just for fun BBM10 roster:
    http://www.sportsmogul.com/vbulletin...d.php?t=198599
    Enjoy!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Pedroia to SS

    Quote Originally Posted by rschusta24 View Post
    The two positions are drastically different. I definately don't think it will be an easy transition, but I think it would be workable. I would only want this to happen if there is a significant addition at second base. Don't want any old shmuck.
    what worries me most is a) a poor defensive season from Pedroia leaving the team stuck with little options because they signed a high dollar overrated 2B and b) a significant loss in offensive production from Pedroia as a result of the move.

    lets not fool ourselves....as Sox fans we see Yuke and take him for granted. I know of very few players ever that can swap positions like he does and not see an offensive deduction.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •