Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: 2010 CHONE Projections

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    Four Phillies - Eric Bruntlett, Tyler Walker, Andy Tracy, and Paul Hoover - were removed from the 40-man roster and became free agents today, according to Andy Martino of the Philadelphia Inquirer.
    The Phillies are idiots, looks like they won't reap the rewards of Andy Tracy

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    5,223

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    Quote Originally Posted by Alloutwar View Post
    I thought this was going to be a set of predictions about Chone Figgins.
    *smirk*
    Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are .

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    if albert draws that few walks, i will eat my hat as well.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Olympia, Washington
    Posts
    1,676

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    When was the last year Ichiro had under 200 hits?

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent, WA
    Posts
    7,613

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    Quote Originally Posted by reflections View Post
    When was the last year Ichiro had under 200 hits?
    was this sarcastic?

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    They have Ryan Church in their Mets predictions.

    Fail.
    ]

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,210

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    Quote Originally Posted by reflections View Post
    When was the last year Ichiro had under 200 hits?
    Probably when he turned 2 years old.
    Ready for Offseason rumors and trade talk!

    Just for fun BBM10 roster:
    http://www.sportsmogul.com/vbulletin...d.php?t=198599
    Enjoy!

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pangea
    Posts
    6,795

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    I love it that they are predicting no Rockie to hit .300 or better.
    Quote Originally Posted by President View Post
    For some reason I thought rockies was a big black guy.

    I was wrong.
    Back at this dynasty thing again: Resurrecting The Rockies: 2001 Onward

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Uptown Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,433

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    I love it that they are predicting no Rockie to hit .300 or better.
    Stop swinging. Let go.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    I love it that they are predicting no Rockie to hit .300 or better.
    "They" aren't predicting anything. It's all pure mathematical formulas.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,210

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    I love it that they are predicting no Rockie to hit .300 or better.
    No Rockies players will hit .300 this year. This is the Schu projection.
    Ready for Offseason rumors and trade talk!

    Just for fun BBM10 roster:
    http://www.sportsmogul.com/vbulletin...d.php?t=198599
    Enjoy!

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: 2010 CHONE Projections

    It's also important to remember that projections are essentially the MEAN of a bunch of projections. Baseball Prospectus's PECOTA projections (when they're out, which won't be until early 2010, usually) show the percentages at various percentiles - 10th percentile projection, 50th percentile, 90th percentile, etc. A projection like CHONE only shows the mean projection, but it still uses the same basic structure to arrive at that mean. Projections are heavily "regressed to the mean." They don't attempt to project which guys will overperform or underperform their actual talent level - because that is essentially a random event. It is expected that a good amount of players will outperform their projection and a good amount will underperform their projection.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •