Underated players

[Josh123123123]

MARIO MANNINGHAM 61/62 NO WAY

AMAHAM BRADSHAW 75 NO WAY

[President]

No, those two are not as bad as Polamalu being rated only 88. He, if it exists, should be 100.

[Josh123123123]

no, those two are not as bad as polamalu being rated only 88. He, if it exists, should be 100.

94-97

[Arctic Blast]

MARIO MANNINGHAM 61/62 NO WAY

AMAHAM BRADSHAW 75 NO WAY

Actually, I'd say that's a solid rating for Bradshaw. He's a good change of pace back who can break big runs but he's not physical enough to really be more than that.

[reflections]

I think almost all of the 2009 rookies got way too low grades. Depending when they inputed the ratings, there should of been given some idea of a player was in the starting lineup or rotation at a position. Obvious Sanchez, Malauga should be a bit higher than most them starting right off the bat. Manningham being in the receiver rotation should be a bit higher.

[Clypse]

lmao! Ya'll think thats bad. They have Patrick Willis rated at 77! WTF?! Thats like 99!

[reflections]

lmao! Ya'll think thats bad. They have Patrick Willis rated at 77! WTF?! Thats like 99!

that is a definite WTF.
Although he did slump from 174 tackles to 141 tackles (insert steep dose of sarcasm)

[reziztor]

Start a franchise in 2002 and just sim the seasons and take part in the drafts... It's crazyness.

[Arctic Blast]

Perhaps not 99 but better than 77. How are the ratings determined anyway?

Predicted stats. Basically the same type of system Baseball Mogul uses.