No. It is. UZR, +/-, hell, even FRAA, are all better than fielding percentage.Originally Posted by metsguy234
o
No. It is. UZR, +/-, hell, even FRAA, are all better than fielding percentage.
Song of Solomon 5:4
To you they are.
]
Hail to the king, baby.
o
Sorry, no. As much as you want that to be the case, it's not. You may not like them, but that doesn't change the fact that they are much better for evaluating defense.
Song of Solomon 5:4
OK, I'd like to see the infallible absolutely correct ordered list of each fielding stat based on their effectiveness.
]
o
Hail to the king, baby.
Uhh, do any stats have an order of effectiveness?
Song of Solomon 5:4
Is it too much to ask for a list? You obviously know the ranking of all the stats.
]
Internet Gang Kingpin
Dude, that's the problem. I'm in college. I play beer pong all the time. That's why I'm so frustrated that I don't get it.wait until ur 21. You should get it by then.
Illini.
Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...
o
No, there's no such thing. You don't need an exact ranking of each and every stat to know that advanced defensive play-by-play metrics are better than friggen' fielding percentage.
Im watching you
oh lol. I was just making a funny, I dont use that term while playing.
Song of Solomon 5:4
.
]
Song of Solomon 5:4
Well fielding percentage is all I'm used to using and I don't want to leave my comfort zone.
]
Internet Gang Kingpin
That's a really sad way to go through life. You should be eager to learn new things.
Illini.
Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...
Song of Solomon 5:4
I don't like leaving my comfort zone.
]
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
