So, I got a reliever, Jonathan Broxton, who pitched 100 innings (on the dot) with a 1.80 ERA. He was invaluable in the pen.
My closer, Bobby Jenks, pitched 62 innings with a 3.06 ERA, converting 44 saves in 51 chances. He wasn't perfect and was a bit inconsistent but got the job done.
So, Broxton would be the better closer most likely, he did better and is rated better. But, I want to put him in the most valuable role. Usually your best reliever is your closer, but in his other role he pitches close to 100 innings.
What role do you think would be better for him? Closer, or the same relief role? Is too much weight put into the closer role?



Reply With Quote


