Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    5,223

    worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    I think this is the worst HOF selection I've ever seen the AI make...please post your nominees for worst BBM HOF selections ever...
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    605

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    maybe baseball mogul thought his average was good enough but still its not like his average was .340 or something

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Watson MN
    Posts
    641

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    BM puts some weight on over 300 averages. Anything good in his vitals?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Savoy, IL
    Posts
    7,662

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    He might have had a reputation as a defensive wizard. I've seen worse.
    Illini.

    Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    102

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    It figures this particular Pete Rose gets in the HOF. He doesn't even have 3000 hits, let alone the 4256 the real one had. I'm sure the gambling habits are the same, too. lol
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    71

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    Most dominant player for six consecutive years, including a .383 average in one season.

    He may have a few MVP award and a couple of gold gloves.

    He may also have a few WS and maybe even one or two WS MVP or divisional playoff MVP.

    I guess he got injured in 2026 and never really recovered.

    The guy would get my vote.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    102

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    While my HOF Pete Rose pales to the real McCoy, he had decent numbers. I personally disagree with the AI on this selection. In my opinion, he wouldn't get the required 5% to stay on the ballot after the first year of eligibility. And he can forget the Veteran's Committee vote later. I like Cuellar, being and Orioles fan myself, but he doesn't have the numbers for consideration.
    And hanging on the last 3 years should've have absolutely killed any remote chances.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Watson MN
    Posts
    641

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    For better consideration to the question posted please post the vitals tab also.

    BM takes the vitals tab into consideration.

    EDIT: I cite this thread for example

    http://sportsmogul.com/vbulletin2/sh...d.php?t=195711
    Last edited by flapper; 06-20-2009 at 02:02 PM. Reason: adding info

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    102

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    True, I didn't really check the Vitals. I knew he had a Cy Young from 1969, was dominant especially from 1969-1972 and though the game doesn't show it, got a World Series ring in 1970. But he mooched his second ring in 1976 by being an underused but experienced #6 starter/mop up guy.
    Still doesn't have HOF numbers. Still, that part of Mogul is very minor to me. It's something that can be tweaked later. Game as a whole is awesome as it is.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Watson MN
    Posts
    641

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    also default for HOF consideration in the ini file gives pitchers more weight

    I think its 105 for pitchers there

    Also probably takes into consideration his 609 win%

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    102

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    And here's Rose's vitals, too. Don Mattingly had similar numbers and achievements in real life but had 467 less hits than my game's Rose. If Donnie Baseball didn't have those back injuries, who knows what that guy could've had at the end.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Watson MN
    Posts
    641

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    Pluses for Pete Rose on your game

    2600 hits
    310 BA
    ROY
    1 MVP

    if he had more than 1 MVP he would have probably gotten in earlier, but that's speculation

    I think if he did not have the MVP award he may have still gotten in but am unsure

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    102

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    Quote Originally Posted by flapper View Post
    also default for HOF consideration in the ini file gives pitchers more weight

    I think its 105 for pitchers there

    Also probably takes into consideration his 609 win%
    Yeah, the winning % is the really the only thing I can think of. My ini has the pitchers set to 100. If I get future pitchers in the Hall like that I might lower that to 95.
    All positions except DH are set at 100. DH I put in 80 instead. Sorry, Edgar Martinez.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    5,223

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    Quote Originally Posted by flapper View Post
    For better consideration to the question posted please post the vitals tab also.

    BM takes the vitals tab into consideration.

    EDIT: I cite this thread for example

    http://sportsmogul.com/vbulletin2/sh...d.php?t=195711
    l
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are .

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pangea
    Posts
    6,795

    Re: worst HOF slection ever by AI?

    What you guys need to notice is all 3 guys you have posted BARELY got in (2 at 78% and 1 at 76%). It's not like they were at 95%, they just squeked in
    Quote Originally Posted by President View Post
    For some reason I thought rockies was a big black guy.

    I was wrong.
    Back at this dynasty thing again: Resurrecting The Rockies: 2001 Onward

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •