Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Results 106 to 112 of 112

Thread: Atheists: Fully Human?

  1. #106
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    airstrip one, oceania
    Posts
    9,272

    Re: Atheists: Fully Human?

    Quote Originally Posted by RickD View Post
    For clarity sake I believe this was the post in question:



    However it was in a completely different thread:

    http://www.sportsmogul.com/vbulletin...d.php?t=195855
    Haha, wow I forgot it was in that thread. Yeh, no wonder Houston was so confused

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Atheists: Fully Human?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Oh, well, gee. Thanks Rick. So I'm not crazy.
    Someone needed to come back and straighten y'all out!

  3. #108
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Atheists: Fully Human?

    Quote Originally Posted by etothep View Post
    Haha, wow I forgot it was in that thread. Yeh, no wonder Houston was so confused
    RickD - Clearer of confusion!

  4. #109
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Atheists: Fully Human?

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    Whats the definition of pointless here?

    If for example theres evidence that says binglebop is going to rob a bank, and take many hostages in the process. Much of the local intelligence says as such, much of the calls made to other regions confirm this evidence....and the local police decide to obtain state police assistance and set up a large scale sting to stop this threat. The local public is made aware of this issue and LARGELY SUPPORT IT, as does the mayor..town council, local businesses, pretty much all of the community. In addition, all of these people AGREE that the threat is significant enough to demand this action, EVEN if it turns out the evidence is proved wrong.

    Was it pointless to take this course of action after we learn the evidence was wrong and public support for it no longer exists?
    wow, my sincere apologize. somehow I did in fact post this in the wrong thread. i've got multiple pages open and somehow screwed it up. Thanks rick for finding the appropriate thread....i thought for sure this was posted like three posts after the post about pointless etc. etc. oh well, my bad. you win this one HGM. I know how to admit when i'm wrong...that aside, i am sincere with my apology.

  5. #110
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9

    Re: Atheists: Fully Human?

    Houston GM: But something would have had to create god...and something would have had to create that something...so, it's paradoxical (I think that's the word I'm looking for, but I'm not sure)
    I guess it's because we don't normally think of something as always being there (and by always I mean like forever)
    北海道日本ハムファイタース
    チャムピーオンス!!

    Hokkaido Nippon Ham Fighters, Champions!!

  6. #111
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Uptown Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,433

    Re: Atheists: Fully Human?

    That's what Axl Rose said! "Nothing lasts forever, even cold November rain."

  7. #112
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Republic of Georgia
    Posts
    12,385

    Re: Atheists: Fully Human?

    Quote Originally Posted by Erii77 View Post
    I guess it's because we don't normally think of something as always being there (and by always I mean like forever)
    That's because we are limited by our perceptions and experience. Both of those pale in comparison to the vastness of the universe.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •