παραλία
So, I (just me-filihok) am getting fed up with reading 'announcer A is such a piece of becummed pubic hair, he said that Johnny Dickwads career batting average is .314 when it is in actuality .315. What a douchbag' posts every 15 seconds in the MLB Talk thread.
I think that type of post (is getting old) is more appropriately placed in the Stupid Announcers thread. What do you think?
E=I*R
Is this really necessary?
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
παραλία
Sure. Democracy in action
E=I*R
Let me just say that this thread really disappoints me. Seriously.
I just lost a lot of respect that I did have for you.
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
παραλία
I'll surviveOriginally Posted by ohms_law
I don't see what is so horrible about gathering statistical data to say that 'X% of those who replied to the poll think that announcer bashing should be in the announcer bashing thread'.
EDIT 2 - 0 by the way
o
This "announcer" thread you mentioned had 2 posts on it and was last posted on a month ago before you necroed it today...to complain about people not posting on it...when I'm sure a good amount of people hadn't even read it let alone REMEMBERED it...it being a month old and all.
παραλία
.
o
So should there be no new threads at all about baseball, since there's already an MLB Talk thread?
E=I*R
IMO, that MLB Talk thread should be closed regardless. But, that's me...
*shrug*
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
I'm watching you.
E=I*R
Yea, I know... and I wasn't really sure why he did, either. And then he created a new one.
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
o
Yeah, that confused me a bit...Yea, I know... and I wasn't really sure why he did, either. And then he created a new one.
I'm watching you.
I think there were inappropriate posts in another topic and he closed the wrong one (MLB Talk), at least from when we were talking about it awhile back, so instead of unlocking it he just created a new thread (note the "no pubes" reference from that thread where RSR and defense were going back and forth).
Anderson disapproves.
So... you bump a month old thread up to tell the people who aren't posting in it that you don't like what they're not posting in there.
Then, you post an unnecessary poll about topics you find unnecessary.
Sure, why not?
E=I*R
From what I remember, there was some stupid argument that was being carried on at the end of the original MLB Talk thread.
Anyway, I just don't understand the whole concept behind that thread. The whole forum is for "MLB Talk"...
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
