Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: leyland = fail

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: leyland = fail

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    The two teams were 1-2 in the AL in home runs in 2008, 235-200. In 2007, the Sox had 190 homers, and the Tigers 177. In 2006, it was 236-203. They're both very powerful teams. White Sox ahead, but both teams are certainly "tremendous" in the power department.
    well my random ass shot in the dark was actually right

    haha, i thought so, but man those Chi Sox hit some homers, and Thome is gonna be joining the 600 club, i'll put money on it.

    but if they Tigers could play to their potential, watch out!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4

    Re: leyland = fail

    I was watching that game last night and I was wondering what the hell was going on.

    I'm biased. I detest playing small ball unless you just don't have anyone capable of hitting.
    Carew,Grich,Burleson,DeCinces,Boone,Downing,Pettis,Jackson,Beniquez

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Savoy, IL
    Posts
    7,662

    Re: leyland = fail

    FTR, if Thames wasn't available, then the correct move would've been to PH Josh Anderson, because he can bunt much better than Everett.

    Pinch hitting Adam Everett is never a good idea ever.
    Illini.

    Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pullman, WA
    Posts
    5,156

    Re: leyland = fail

    Quote Originally Posted by haveacigar View Post
    Pinch hitting Adam Everett is never a good idea ever.
    But pinch hitting for Adam Everett is a great idea.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •