Dosen't that go against the basic theory of BABIP? But you have to take what goes with all that:
Sure maybe he could go up there and raise is BA 15-20 point but then he would walk alot less and lose 20-30 point off his OBP. And Maybe he could add 10-15 RBI that way, but he'd be on base less and lose 10 runs scored. so:I think it's fair. Adam Dunn can hit the ball as far or further than anyone playing the game. And he's got a GREAT eye for the strike zone, as proven by his walks, but he strikes out almost 200 times a year.
If he could just cut that in half, I'd bet his BA would top .260 consistently and his RBI totals would go up by perhaps 20 per year.
so I don't think the overall sum would be winning more, it'd in all likelyhood be pretty similar if he was that way, and proabably worse if he tried to change.And that would be helping your team win MORE, and I think that's where the criticism comes from.




Reply With Quote
