Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 70

Thread: Manny to St. Louis

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    I think St. Louis would love Manny, so long as they make the playoffs. He'll greatly help the cause but if they don't make the playoffs of course many will say it wasn't worth it.

    As far as balance...i'd say Manny hits right handers a heck of alot better than any other left handed bat St. Louis would currently put in his stead, that argument really holds no water IMHO.
    I understand. I just see a need for plenty of balance, not saying Manny wouldn't offer that. Just what I believe. I want a very balanced lineup. If you added Manny and put him in left, and Ludwick in right. This is how it woudl look.

    1. A. Kennedy 2B (bc without Shumaker we have no leadoff man)
    2. R. Ludwick RF (I think he needs to be lower in the lineup, however, he would get pitches to hit in front of Albert)
    3. A. Pujols 1B
    4. M. Ramirez LF
    5. R. Ankiel CF (even though he would be an ideal RF)
    6. T. Glaus 3B
    7. K. Greene SS
    8. Y. Molina C
    9. Pitcher (but Tony like them batting 8th)

    Problem is there are only two guys that can hit from the left side in this lineup. Kennedy and Ankiel. And niether are really ideal. with the available budget, the Cardinals would be better off not spending it on another hitter that will create more of a logjam in our outfield. An outfield that is waiting on Colby Rasmus and would need a place for someone like Skip who has definetly earned the right to start.

    I just don't see this as the proper choice for the Birdos.
    6.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    That lineup just has a lot of right handed hitters who are primarily known has power hitters and not contact hitters....other then Molina IMO

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    You guys do know that Manny can absolutely crush both RHPs and LHPs, right?? Not wanting Manny b/c he's right-handed is insanity. He's one of the best hitters in the game, period.

    There may be other reasons to not want him..cost, bad clubhouse guy, maybe with a big contract his performance would suffer..I don't know, but lineup balance isn't one of them.
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    I understand. I just see a need for plenty of balance, not saying Manny wouldn't offer that. Just what I believe. I want a very balanced lineup. If you added Manny and put him in left, and Ludwick in right. This is how it woudl look.

    1. A. Kennedy 2B (bc without Shumaker we have no leadoff man)
    2. R. Ludwick RF (I think he needs to be lower in the lineup, however, he would get pitches to hit in front of Albert)
    3. A. Pujols 1B
    4. M. Ramirez LF
    5. R. Ankiel CF (even though he would be an ideal RF)
    6. T. Glaus 3B
    7. K. Greene SS
    8. Y. Molina C
    9. Pitcher (but Tony like them batting 8th)

    Problem is there are only two guys that can hit from the left side in this lineup. Kennedy and Ankiel. And niether are really ideal. with the available budget, the Cardinals would be better off not spending it on another hitter that will create more of a logjam in our outfield. An outfield that is waiting on Colby Rasmus and would need a place for someone like Skip who has definetly earned the right to start.

    I just don't see this as the proper choice for the Birdos.
    6.

    I don't understand the logic however. The purpose of 'balance' is because LH hitters supposedly perform better against RH pitchers and visa-versa. But Manny hits RH pitchers much better than most LH hitters, so he's by default better than most LH hitters in his slot. Especially if those you're discussing taking his spot are Colby Rasmus or Skip Schumaker.

    I'm just saying, his salary....his taking the spot of a young stud prospect....those are fair arguments. Him not being LH however makes no sense to me as a valid argument.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    its that dumb attitude that cost the mets a trip to the postseason last year. the mets EASILY could have had Manny, heck the dodgers got him for a song. But they listened to this type of attitude and watched the Dodgers and Phillies again in October.

    The Mets will most certainly do the same this October unless they sign Manny. I really see him as the only FA still out there that will help their team overcome the many weaknesses they have and make the playoffs.
    agreed. I tell you what... id take him on my Braves in an instant... Manny being manny... being a jerk, laying down will STILL get you a .300 BA 35+ HR 120+ RBI .400 OBP. I dont CARE he is a nutcase... he is pure WIN. If it took a 3 year deal and it was 20 per year... id swoop in in an instant. make a 4th year vest with ab's in year 2 and 3 = 850 or something like that. he wins mvp in 3rd year his contract is guarenteed in 4th at 25 or something like that. Sheffield laid down too yet teams kept signing him, and trading for him
    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Manny
    2006
    Code:
    I Split         G   GS  PA  AB  R   H  2B 3B HR RBI  BB IBB  SO HBP  SH  SF ROE GDP  SB CS   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  BAbip sOPS+ tOPS+ Split
    +-+------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+--+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------------+
       vs RHP as RH 122     384 317     101 18  1 25  67  61   6  75   0   0   6   5  11   0  1  .319  .422  .618 1.040  .341   178    96 vs RHP as RH 
       vs LHP as RH  74     174 132      43  9  0 10  35  39  10  27   1   0   2   0   2   0  0  .326  .477  .621 1.098  .340   178   109 vs LHP as RH

    2007
    Code:
     I Split         G   GS  PA  AB  R   H  2B 3B HR RBI  BB IBB  SO HBP  SH  SF ROE GDP  SB CS   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  BAbip sOPS+ tOPS+ Split
    +-+------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+--+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------------+
       vs RHP as RH 125     408 355      99 25  1 11  66  38   8  66   7   0   8   2  17   0  0  .279  .353  .448  .801  .308   120    82 vs RHP as RH 
       vs LHP as RH  63     161 128      44  8  0  9  22  33   5  26   0   0   0   1   4   0  0  .344  .478  .617 1.095  .376   174   148 vs LHP as RH
    2008
    Code:
    I Split         G   GS  PA  AB  R   H  2B 3B HR RBI  BB IBB  SO HBP  SH  SF ROE GDP  SB CS   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  BAbip sOPS+ tOPS+ Split
    +-+------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+--+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------------+
       vs RHP as RH 150     503 419     142 29  0 32 100  69  14 104  11   0   4   5  15   1  0  .339  .441  .637 1.079  .383   197   108 vs RHP as RH 
       vs LHP as RH  66     151 133      41  7  1  5  21  18  10  20   0   0   0   1   2   2  0  .308  .391  .489  .879  .333   127    72 vs LHP as RH
    ill take those #'s on my team thats for damn sure
    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    as for manny tanking it with the Sox...
    Code:
     I Split         G   GS  PA  AB  R   H  2B 3B HR RBI  BB IBB  SO HBP  SH  SF ROE GDP  SB CS   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  BAbip sOPS+ tOPS+ Split
    +-+------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+--+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------------+
       1st Half      90  87 380 328  58  96 18  1 18  60  44   5  82   8   0   0   3  10   1  0  .293  .389  .518  .908  .342   144    77 1st Half     
       2nd Half      63  63 274 224  44  87 18  0 19  61  43  19  42   3   0   4   3   7   2  0  .388  .485  .723 1.209  .407   214   133 2nd Half
    ill take those #'s anyway
    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,447

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    Too many power righties in the lineup with no balance.
    "Too many power righties" doesn't apply to Pujols or Manny. Career splits for both:

    Pujols vs. L: .347/.450/.640, OPS of 1.089
    Pujols vs. R: .330/.417/.619, OPS of 1.035
    Manny vs. L: .340/.446/.628, OPS of 1.074
    Manny vs. R: .306/.398/.582, OPS of .980

    They both destroy lefties but still totally CRUSH righties. You'd be hard-pressed to find any (available) left-handed bats that will be more useful against right-handed pitching. Both Dunn and Abreu, for example, pale in comparison against righties.

    You can't talk about these guys like they're both Pat Burrell.

    Also, I just noticed this has been pointed out several times already, as I posted this before reading through the entire thread.

    Manny would be too expensive and not worth half of what he will get.
    I kind of agree with the first part, but not the second part. You'd end up with the greatest 1-2 punch in all of baseball, even better than ARod-Tex.

    He is a great hitter, would make everyone else better. But I truley hope this doesn't happen.
    It won't happen. The Cardinals have already been very clear that they will not be spending any money.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Republic of Georgia
    Posts
    12,385

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by justanewguy View Post
    "Too many power righties" doesn't apply to Pujols or Manny. Career splits for both:

    Pujols vs. L: .347/.450/.640, OPS of 1.089
    Pujols vs. R: .330/.417/.619, OPS of 1.035
    Manny vs. L: .340/.446/.628, OPS of 1.074
    Manny vs. R: .306/.398/.582, OPS of .980

    They both destroy lefties but still totally CRUSH righties. You'd be hard-pressed to find any (available) left-handed bats that will be more useful against right-handed pitching. Both Dunn and Abreu, for example, pale in comparison against righties.
    Dunn vs L: .235/.359/.464 OPS .833
    Dunn vs R: .252/.392/.539 OPS .931

    Arbeu vs L: .280/.382/.404 OPS .776
    Abreu vs R: .308/.417/.534 OPS .951

    So, yeah, Manny is better than both vs righties

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    South Park, CO
    Posts
    2,908

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    I dont want Manny i like this opening day lineup
    1.Skip SchuMaker LF
    2.Rick Ankiel CF
    3.Albert Pujols 1B
    4.Ryan Ludwick RF
    5.David Freese 3B (until Glaus is healthy)
    6.Khalile Greene SS
    7.Yadier Molina C
    8.Adam Wainwright P
    9.Adam Kennedy 2B
    Lakers/Cardinals/Patriots/Penguins


  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    its that dumb attitude that cost the mets a trip to the postseason last year. the mets EASILY could have had Manny, heck the dodgers got him for a song. But they listened to this type of attitude and watched the Dodgers and Phillies again in October.

    The Mets will most certainly do the same this October unless they sign Manny. I really see him as the only FA still out there that will help their team overcome the many weaknesses they have and make the playoffs.
    Well said. The Mets have gigantic holes in the corner outfield spots. Manny would solve that perfectly. The only other teams that have a similar NEED for Manny are the Angels and Dodgers.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    That lineup just has a lot of right handed hitters who are primarily known has power hitters and not contact hitters....other then Molina IMO
    So?

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, MO (SEMO)
    Posts
    16,719

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by DarthJaker View Post
    I dont want Manny i like this opening day lineup
    1.Skip SchuMaker LF
    2.Rick Ankiel CF
    3.Albert Pujols 1B
    4.Ryan Ludwick RF
    5.David Freese 3B (until Glaus is healthy)
    6.Khalile Greene SS
    7.Yadier Molina C
    8.Adam Wainwright P
    9.Adam Kennedy 2B
    I'm happy with that lineup as well, a true leadoff hitter would be nice though, and let skip bat second. But I am happy with it. We'll see how Kennedy does

    and to answer HGM's question of so?
    I know, a surplus of a good thing, is a great thing. and you can never have enough power hitters on your team. I am just not a real fan of the long ball in baseball. I tend to look more at small ball, and I guess I support my Cardinals doing what I think...of course that isn't how it works. That's just what I wish, I want their style in the 80's to come back honestly.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    I'm happy with that lineup as well, a true leadoff hitter would be nice though, and let skip bat second. But I am happy with it. We'll see how Kennedy does

    and to answer HGM's question of so?
    I know, a surplus of a good thing, is a great thing. and you can never have enough power hitters on your team. I am just not a real fan of the long ball in baseball. I tend to look more at small ball, and I guess I support my Cardinals doing what I think...of course that isn't how it works. That's just what I wish, I want their style in the 80's to come back honestly.


    Yeah, but wouldn't you like your team to win? Manny helps teams win, simple as that. Now..with the money he's asking for....I can see not wanting to devote that much cash to him......
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Well said. The Mets have gigantic holes in the corner outfield spots. Manny would solve that perfectly. The only other teams that have a similar NEED for Manny are the Angels and Dodgers.
    and Atlanta
    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,447

    Re: Manny to St. Louis

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Well said. The Mets have gigantic holes in the corner outfield spots. Manny would solve that perfectly. The only other teams that have a similar NEED for Manny are the Angels and Dodgers.
    And the Giants, of course. With what looks like one of baseball's best rotations, Manny's bat could put them over the top and probably make them the favorites in that division. Without that kind of bat, they're only in contention because they reside in a terrible division.

    2009's NL West winner could theoretically win just by having a pulse.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •