Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: game always has a winner?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Buzzards Bay
    Posts
    1,556

    game always has a winner?

    Need a baseball rule guru to help me out here. I was under the impression that if a pitcher was ineffective, even if he should get the win, he may not. For example he pitches the 9th with a 5-1 lead, loses the lead but his team wins in the bottom of the inning. I have a friend who says the rules say he gets the win and thats that. I thought the scorer, or other offical, could rule that there is no win awarded. There is six pack of Corona, with lime, riding on this.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Nope, he gets the win. Every game has a winner and a loser.

    Rule 10.17.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO (current), Fairfield, IA (permanent)
    Posts
    1,230

    Re: game always has a winner?

    He gets the win.

    ----------------------------------

    "Every trial endured and weathered in the right spirit makes a soul nobler and stronger than it was before."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pangea
    Posts
    6,795

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Unless it's a tie
    Quote Originally Posted by President View Post
    For some reason I thought rockies was a big black guy.

    I was wrong.
    Back at this dynasty thing again: Resurrecting The Rockies: 2001 Onward

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    Unless it's a tie
    Sure, but games can't end in ties anymore.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Buzzards Bay
    Posts
    1,556

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Darn....thanks anyways..
    I think the 10-17b comment is what i was thinking of. its still gonna cost me a 6 pack though....


    the first relief pitcher pitches effectively, the official scorer should not presumptively credit that pitcher with the win, because the rule requires that the win be credited to the pitcher who was the most effective, and a subsequent relief pitcher may have been most effective. The official scorer, in determining which relief pitcher was the most effective, should consider the number of runs, earned runs and base runners given up by each relief pitcher and the context of the game at the time of each relief pitcher’s appearance. If two or more relief pitchers were similarly effective, the official scorer should give the presumption to the earlier pitcher as the winning pitcher.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pangea
    Posts
    6,795

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Sure, but games can't end in ties anymore.
    All-Star Games can :P
    Quote Originally Posted by President View Post
    For some reason I thought rockies was a big black guy.

    I was wrong.
    Back at this dynasty thing again: Resurrecting The Rockies: 2001 Onward

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO (current), Fairfield, IA (permanent)
    Posts
    1,230

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    All-Star Games can :P
    They don't count for stats in case you didn't already know.

    ----------------------------------

    "Every trial endured and weathered in the right spirit makes a soul nobler and stronger than it was before."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pangea
    Posts
    6,795

    Re: game always has a winner?

    It is still a game
    Quote Originally Posted by President View Post
    For some reason I thought rockies was a big black guy.

    I was wrong.
    Back at this dynasty thing again: Resurrecting The Rockies: 2001 Onward

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    856

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Sure, but games can't end in ties anymore.
    Nitpicking....but what if it's a rainout of a late inning tie game...that is the last game of the season with neither team in contention?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavelb1 View Post
    Nitpicking....but what if it's a rainout of a late inning tie game...that is the last game of the season with neither team in contention?
    No idea on that one.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, ON
    Posts
    1,353

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Just a guess - but I think they wipe the game in that case. It acts just like a rainout after 3 innings.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavelb1 View Post
    Nitpicking....but what if it's a rainout of a late inning tie game...that is the last game of the season with neither team in contention?
    I bet they would go back to the last completed inning where one team was ahead and call it a game after that point, if that point is far enough along to be considered an official game. If not possible, I bet they'd just call it a rainout and just cancel the game outright.

    No basis for this, just what I bet would happen.
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    820

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by acetoolguy View Post
    For example he pitches the 9th with a 5-1 lead, loses the lead but his team wins in the bottom of the inning. I have a friend who says the rules say he gets the win and thats that. I thought the scorer, or other offical, could rule that there is no win awarded.
    There has to be a win awarded if a team wins a game, but where you're probably being confused is that there is some flexibility given to the official scorer in a game in which there are several relief pitchers. The essence of that is that if a pitcher is in the game when his team takes the lead, but a successive pitcher plays more important role in his team winning (pitches "more effectively"), that later pitcher can be awarded the win.

    But it only applies to "successive pitchers." In your example, he's the last pitcher in the game so only he could be in consideration.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: game always has a winner?

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    All-Star Games can :P
    Quote Originally Posted by bucher34 View Post
    They don't count for stats in case you didn't already know.
    and they can no LONGER end in ties as stated above
    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •