Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 116

Thread: All-Time Positional Rankings

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Okay, worked everything in for first basemen and the above rankings are "final".
    It may be beside the point if the 1B list is final, but I'd put Greenberg lower, and I'd think I'd put Beckley ahead of Terry and Sisler.

    I don't have much of a handle on Start, either, but he was a good player well into his 40s, which was much rarer back in the day than it is now--that's got to be a point in his favor.

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by dps View Post
    It may be beside the point if the 1B list is final, but I'd put Greenberg lower, and I'd think I'd put Beckley ahead of Terry and Sisler.
    I'm giving Greenberg credit for missing most of 1942, all of 1942-1944, and half of 1945, due to the war. He picked up right where he left off, and had he played those seasons, his career would look a lot better.

    As for Beckley, Terry, and Sisler, Beckley has no peak to speak of, and I like to see at least some peak. Sisler had a great peak, but little outside of it. Him and Terry could probably be flip-flopped.

    The lists aren't 100% final. They'll never be 100%. I'm always open to hearing new arguments and revising my choices.

    I don't have much of a handle on Start, either, but he was a good player well into his 40s, which was much rarer back in the day than it is now--that's got to be a point in his favor.
    Also, as he was 28 in 1871, the first recorded year of his career, his peak likely came in the 1860's. During discussion, some people did run some "projections" of how he would've done in his 20's, based off similar post-age-28 players. Without that credit, I don't think he makes the cut-off.

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    221

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by dps View Post
    It may be beside the point if the 1B list is final, but I'd put Greenberg lower, and I'd think I'd put Beckley ahead of Terry and Sisler.

    I don't have much of a handle on Start, either, but he was a good player well into his 40s, which was much rarer back in the day than it is now--that's got to be a point in his favor.
    Who would you put ahead of Greenberg?

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by wahoosamC View Post
    Who would you put ahead of Greenberg?
    Originally, I was thinking I'd drop him about 4 or 5 spots, but HGM may be right that I'm not giving him enough credit for missed years due to the war.

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Slightly revised first base rankings:

    1. Lou Gehrig
    2. Jimmie Foxx
    3. Cap Anson
    4. Dan Brouthers
    5. Johnny Mize
    6. Roger Connor
    7. Hank Greenberg
    8. Mark McGwire
    9. Eddie Murray
    10. Willie McCovey
    11. Buck Leonard
    12. Harmon Killebrew
    13. Mule Suttles
    14. Keith Hernandez
    15. Will Clark
    16. Joe Start
    17. George Sisler
    18. Bill Terry
    19. Jake Beckley


    And third base:
    1. Mike Schmidt
    2. Eddie Mathews
    3. Wade Boggs
    4. George Brett
    5. Jud Wilson
    6. Frank Baker
    7. Ron Santo
    8. Heinie Groh
    9. Brooks Robinson
    10. Dick Allen
    11. Paul Molitor
    12. Ezra Sutton
    13. Jimmy Collins
    14. Darrell Evans
    15. John Beckwith
    16. John McGraw
    17. Stan Hack
    18. Graig Nettles
    19. Ken Boyer
    Last edited by HoustonGM; 01-19-2009 at 09:25 PM.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cowcrap Town
    Posts
    5,894

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    One question that im curious about, why is Will Clark rated higher than George Sisler who batted over .400 twice?

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by ragecage View Post
    One question that im curious about, why is Will Clark rated higher than George Sisler who batted over .400 twice?
    Sisler's an odd case because, at his peak, he was amazing. I have him as the best first basemen in the AL every year from 1916 to 1922. However, he missed 1923 with a severe case of sinusitis and was never the same player again. He still played full time from 1924 to the end of his career, but was a poor hitter for a first basemen. According to Dan Rosenheck's WARP, his career score is 45.9, a mere .2 wins above the total of his best 7 years, which was 45.7.

    Clark had a smaller peak. I have him as the best first basemen in the NL 3 times - 1988, 1989, and 1991. However, Clark has more value outside of his peak than Sisler had, which leads me to rank him over Sisler. It should be noted that from 14-17 (Keith Hernandez, Clark, Joe Start, and Sisler), there's very little separating them.

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Second base:

    1. Eddie Collins
    2. Rogers Hornsby
    3. Joe Morgan
    4. Nap Lajoie
    5. Jackie Robinson
    6. Charlie Gehringer
    7. Bobby Grich
    8. Rod Carew
    9. Ryne Sandberg
    10. Ross Barnes
    11. Frankie Frisch
    12. Billy Herman
    13. Lou Whitaker
    14. Joe Gordon
    15. Bobby Doerr
    16. Bid McPhee
    17. Cupid Childs
    18. Hardy Richardson
    19. Frank Grant
    20. Willie Randolph
    21. Nellie Fox

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    I'd rank Hornsby and Barnes lower--Hornsby's defense sucked, and Barnes had a short career. I'd move McPhee up a bit I think, but I'm not sure how much.

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by dps View Post
    I'd rank Hornsby and Barnes lower--Hornsby's defense sucked, and Barnes had a short career. I'd move McPhee up a bit I think, but I'm not sure how much.
    Hornsby's bat was phenomenal though. I can't see ranking him any lower than 2nd. I don't think his defense "sucked." It certainly wasn't good, but it was tolerable with that bat.

    Barnes had a short career but his peak was phenomenal.

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    3,431

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    No Roberto Alomar in the top 20 at 2B?

    Edit: Never mind - memo to self: read the ground rules. They're usually found on the first page of the thread.
    My Simulation Settings Widget

    My 1901-2008 Simulation Settings (March 6, 2009 Update: Now runs through 1951)

    "I think 'competing' is the key word in your phrase. The Rays are not competitive in the playoff race this year, nor do they seem to me to be on track to in the coming years." - LQ1Z34 on 08/23/11
    "Bwahahahahahah! Don't count your chickens before they've hatched dude." - Me on 09/25/11

    "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." - Mark Twain

    "Science exists, moreover, only as a journey toward truth. Stifle dissent and you end that journey." - John Charles Polanyi

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by actionjackson View Post
    No Roberto Alomar in the top 20 at 2B?

    Edit: Never mind - memo to self: read the ground rules. They're usually found on the first page of the thread.


    If I wind up voting in the coming year's HoM election, my top 2, I presume, in some order, will be Barry Larkin and Roberto Alomar. I haven't started looking closely yet at the non-inductees, though.

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Shortstop was the hardest position to deal with so far. It had the greatest number of Negro Leaguers, with John Henry Lloyd, Home Run Johnson, Dick Lundy, Dobie Moore, and Willie Wells. It had a guy in the HoM more for his undocumented 1850's/1860's work than his 1870's, as he was an old player in his decline phase by the time major leagues like the National Association were established, in Dickey Pearce, and it has a shortstop/pitcher hybrid in John Ward, plus oddities like the extreme peak of Hughie Jennings, and the Sisleresque career of Ernie Banks.

    1. Honus Wagner
    2. John Henry Lloyd
    3. Cal Ripken, Jr.
    4. Arky Vaughan
    5. George Davis
    6. Bill Dahlen
    7. Robin Yount
    8. Luke Appling
    9. Joe Cronin
    10. George Wright
    11. Alan Trammell
    12. Ozzie Smith
    13. Ernie Banks
    14. Willie Wells
    15. Home Run Johnson
    16. Pee Wee Reese
    17. Lou Boudreau
    18. Bobby Wallace
    19. Jack Glasscock
    20. Joe Sewell
    21. Hughie Jennings
    22. John Ward
    23. Dickey Pearce
    24. Dick Lundy
    25. Dobie Moore

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    I'd rank Smith and Glasscock higher.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: All-Time Positional Rankings

    Catcher:

    1. Josh Gibson
    2. Johnny Bench
    3. Yogi Berra
    4. Gary Carter
    5. Gabby Hartnett
    6. Bill Dickey
    7. Carlton Fisk
    8. Mickey Cochrane
    9. Deacon White
    10. Buck Ewing
    11. Roy Campanella
    12. Louis Santop
    13. Ted Simmons
    14. Cal McVey
    15. Bill Freehan
    16. Joe Torre
    17. Charlie Bennett
    18. Roger Bresnahan
    19. Quincy Trouppe
    20. Biz Mackey

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •