Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 142

Thread: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    And why is everyone considering Sosa as a steroid case? I've never heard any Sammy Sosa-steroids suspicion.
    Really..., really?
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    221

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Both had 300 or so HR, both were CF, both had above average defense.

    Wow, is this a joke? Edmonds had 80 more HR's in 3 less season, but HR's doesn't make anybody similar. Edmonds has a career OPS+ of 132, Finley's is 104. Finley only has one season with an OPS+ higher than Edmonds career average. Edmonds has as big of an edge hitting wise as A-Rod does over Jeter, it's not even remotely close. And Finley has an FRAA of -12 for his career in CF, that's below average defense.

    So Edmonds has a ridiculous edge hitting wise, and a large edge defensively, but hey Finley could steal more bases. It's not really close, Finley was just an average CFer, Edmonds was an elite one during his era.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    And why is everyone considering Sosa as a steroid case? I've never heard any Sammy Sosa-steroids suspicion.
    Quote Originally Posted by YEAH DAAAAWG View Post
    Really..., really?
    Yes. Really. He's absolutely right. The only suspicion is because he hit a ton of home runs. There's no other players saying he was a steroid user (except Jose Canseco saying "Hey, just look at him"), no connections to online pharmacies, no mistresses saying he did steroids, there's NOTHING.

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Both had 300 or so HR, both were CF, both had above average defense.
    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Those are really the only places (besides speed) where people could be similar on a baseball field...
    Wow.

    First off, Edmonds hit 382 HR, Finley 304. Edmonds, though, had 2,750 less plate appearances. There's also Edmonds' .377 OBP to Finley's .332. Edmonds .528 slugging to Finley's .442. 132 OPS+ to 104.

    Edmonds was better than Finley at everything except speed. They were not similar in any possible way, and you really need to learn more about baseball if you think the only parts of it are home runs, position, and fielding ability.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cowcrap Town
    Posts
    5,894

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Heck, Edmonds in his prime was the best CF I have ever seen play defense, he was spectacular.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Wow, I didn't know Edmonds had done that well.

    And HGM, is there a 4th part of baseball for a position player? Hitting, fielding, running, and ?
    ]

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    221

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Wow, I didn't know Edmonds had done that well.

    And HGM, is there a 4th part of baseball for a position player? Hitting, fielding, running, and ?
    Well maybe you should do some research before posting such comments?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Wow, I didn't know Edmonds had done that well.
    This is why you look things up before making statements, as I've suggested many times before.

    And HGM, is there a 4th part of baseball for a position player? Hitting, fielding, running, and ?
    Hitting is not limited to home runs.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Iowa City
    Posts
    2,418

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Those are really the only places (besides speed) where people could be similar on a baseball field...
    What the hell are you talking about??? Are you saying that home runs are the only stat you can compare players with? What about hits, putouts, or ANYTHING besides home runs. There are hundreds of other stats to compare players with.
    Gooo Angels!

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by ragecage View Post
    Heck, Edmonds in his prime was the best CF I have ever seen play defense, he was spectacular.
    Him and Griffey Junior ruled the American League in the 90's.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    This is why you look things up before making statements, as I've suggested many times before.


    Hitting is not limited to home runs.
    And I never said it was
    ]

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball View Post
    Him and Griffey Junior ruled the American League in the 90's.
    Dont worry, metsguy234 watches baseball and sees soccer

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    And I never said it was
    seriously kid you are making a fool out of yourself.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by spitball View Post
    seriously kid you have made a fool out of yourself over and over and over, you should probably just scrap your account, get a new one with a new name and just start over..as is, you will forever be known as completely clueless due to the infinite number of times that you have shown a large degree of ignorance.


    fyp
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Wow, I didn't know Edmonds had done that well.

    And HGM, is there a 4th part of baseball for a position player? Hitting, fielding, running, and ?
    Nobody tell him, I want him to figure it out on his own


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Are there more current/unelected HOF'ers

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Both had 300 or so HR, both were CF, both had above average defense.
    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Those are really the only places (besides speed) where people could be similar on a baseball field...
    .

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •