Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 95

Thread: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Exact same criticisms from the past three seasons. Can someone please explain how we've gotten better the past three seasons and probably will again next year, along with an improving farm system, with such an awful GM??

    A couple FA signings this offseason have been poor. This one isn't. I don't mind paying 1 million dollars extra to get TPJ off the roster and have a utility player who can play just about every position..and no, there is nobody in our minor league system who can do that. Somebody name that person. Gookie Dawkins???


    HoRam and Farnsworth are two signings I don't like. The others I'm fine with. I'd rather wait for Dayton Moore to even have one bad year before criticizing him. Literally every single aspect of the organization has improved under him. The ML club, the farm system, more scouts, international spending, we've added a farm club, we outspent EVERYONE in the draft last year, front office additions such as Arbuckle from Philly.........literally every aspect of the organization has improved dramatically since DM took over..and I dare anyone to try to deny that. It's simply a fact.

    If we get worse as a team next year, then I'll start to wonder about DM..but it's not going to happen since our starting rotation is looking decent, we have an elite closer (why doesn't anyone want to talk about DM stealing Soria and locking him up an an amazing contrat...funny how that little detail never comes up in his transactions......crazy I know) and a few young position players who are continually developing.

    ..and for the record, no, I don't like DM's offseason overall. I don't think it's the end of the world as some are saying and I'm willing to seperate the bad deals from the fine ones. HoRam and Farnsy are bad, Jacobs is debatable. I like Crisp and this one.
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Is there any indication that the Royals have even tried, though?
    We were the highest bidders for Hiroka Kuroda last season. We were the highest bidder for Rafael Furcal for a while, but he ignored us. We were the highest bidder for Torii Hunter up until the last minute last year, turns out he was just using us as leverage to get another team to up their offer at the last minute. We went hard after Andruw Jones last year, but he ignored us.


    That's four off the top of my head. They all ignore us.
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Savoy, IL
    Posts
    7,662

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Unfortunately, this phenomenon isn't limited to bad teams like the Royals. But what the hell is the 2nd year supposed to do? Are they really worried about losing Willie Bloomquist to the Yankees after he hits .380 this year?

    The worst is the way Dayton Moore compares him to Craig Counsell and calls him an on-base guy. Overrating someone's hustle is one thing, that's already a chronic problem in baseball (Brandon Inge, anyone?). Calling him an on-base guy makes me think he doesn't even look at stat sheets, or is choosing to only look at the last year (All 170 ABs of it). There's nothing positive about this deal (you could replace TPJ more easily and cheaply I'm sure), and 2 years is just baffling. At least with some of the others guys like Jacobs and Farnsworth, I can see the upside. Bloomquist has no upside.
    Illini.

    Yeah I need a Winn-Dixie grocery bag full of money right next to the VIP section...

  4. #19
    FRENCHREDSOX Guest

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by haveacigar View Post
    Unfortunately, this phenomenon isn't limited to bad teams like the Royals. But what the hell is the 2nd year supposed to do? Are they really worried about losing Willie Bloomquist to the Yankees after he hits .380 this year?

    The worst is the way Dayton Moore compares him to Craig Counsell and calls him an on-base guy. Overrating someone's hustle is one thing, that's already a chronic problem in baseball (Brandon Inge, anyone?). Calling him an on-base guy makes me think he doesn't even look at stat sheets, or is choosing to only look at the last year (All 170 ABs of it). There's nothing positive about this deal (you could replace TPJ more easily and cheaply I'm sure), and 2 years is just baffling. At least with some of the others guys like Jacobs and Farnsworth, I can see the upside. Bloomquist has no upside.
    No they arent afraid to lose him BUT want trade value.Also Bloomquist SIGNED also because of the 2 nd year - heck this isnt a BAD deal,Bloomquist has versatility & numerous players are signed AT THESE EXACT PRICES FOR the same reason (eg Alex Cora/Chris Gomez to name a few) --- the difference is Wee Wilie CAN play EVERYWHERE & from a KC pov he is an "acceptable cost"

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by FRENCHREDSOX View Post
    No they arent afraid to lose him BUT want trade value.Also Bloomquist SIGNED also because of the 2 nd year - heck this isnt a BAD deal,Bloomquist has versatility & numerous players are signed AT THESE EXACT PRICES FOR the same reason (eg Alex Cora/Chris Gomez to name a few) --- the difference is Wee Wilie CAN play EVERYWHERE & from a KC pov he is an "acceptable cost"

    No no, you're talking about the Royals. I think you forgot that fact when bringing some actual reason to this thread.
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by KowboyKoop View Post
    Exact same criticisms from the past three seasons. Can someone please explain how we've gotten better the past three seasons and probably will again next year, along with an improving farm system, with such an awful GM??
    Read the entirety of my last post. I'll quote the relevant part:
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM
    By the way, the Royals have done a really good job in the draft the last year or two, and their farm system has drastically improved under Dayton Moore as GM. Moore, I think, is an excellent guy to put in charge of your drafting and development, but I think he's ill-fitted for a GM job, as he's shown a real weak point when it comes to evaluating major league players. He's a great guy to have in your front office, because he does seem to have a good eye for young, minor league talent, but as the head honcho, I don't think so.
    I don't mind paying 1 million dollars extra to get TPJ off the roster and have a utility player who can play just about every position..and no, there is nobody in our minor league system who can do that. Somebody name that person. Gookie Dawkins???
    Well, for one, I said the real problem with the deal is that it's part of a larger overall problem. On a one year deal, it's not bad, but Bloomquist a) isn't worth 2 years and b) isn't worth over a million dollars. Even if there's nobody in their minor league system, these types of players are freely available either off the waiver wire or through minor deals.

    why doesn't anyone want to talk about DM stealing Soria and locking him up an an amazing contrat...funny how that little detail never comes up in his transactions......crazy I know
    That falls under what I said above - he's good at evaluating young talent.

    Quote Originally Posted by FRENCHREDSOX
    No they arent afraid to lose him BUT want trade value.
    Willie Bloomquist has no real trade value, unless you can swindle some dumb GM into giving you anything of value for him.

    heck this isnt a BAD deal,Bloomquist has versatility & numerous players are signed AT THESE EXACT PRICES FOR the same reason (eg Alex Cora/Chris Gomez to name a few)
    Signing Cora to this type of a deal isn't a smart move either, and Chris Gomez just signed a minor league deal.

    Quote Originally Posted by KowboysKoop
    No no, you're talking about the Royals. I think you forgot that fact when bringing some actual reason to this thread.
    I know you're a Royals fan, but the whole "Everybody hates the Royals" thing is getting old. I don't base my evaluations of deals by what the name of the team they were done by is. I thought the Crisp trade was fine. Jacobs, Farnsworth, Ramirez and Bloomquist, I didn't like. Not because they were made by the Royals, but because I didn't like the moves.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Read the entirety of my last post. I'll quote the relevant part:



    Well, for one, I said the real problem with the deal is that it's part of a larger overall problem. On a one year deal, it's not bad, but Bloomquist a) isn't worth 2 years and b) isn't worth over a million dollars. Even if there's nobody in their minor league system, these types of players are freely available either off the waiver wire or through minor deals.


    That falls under what I said above - he's good at evaluating young talent.


    Willie Bloomquist has no real trade value, unless you can swindle some dumb GM into giving you anything of value for him.


    Signing Cora to this type of a deal isn't a smart move either, and Chris Gomez just signed a minor league deal.


    I know you're a Royals fan, but the whole "Everybody hates the Royals" thing is getting old. I don't base my evaluations of deals by what the name of the team they were done by is. I thought the Crisp trade was fine. Jacobs, Farnsworth, Ramirez and Bloomquist, I didn't like. Not because they were made by the Royals, but because I didn't like the moves.


    Just to be clear, I'm not talking about your criticisms, that's why I didn't quote your post. I am talking about the media and famous bloggers and all that...and it's quite clear that whatever we do gets bashed no matter what. No other team gets criticized this much for bringing in a utility infielder.

    Obviously I get a little worked up about it, but it's been going on for three years while we've been clearly getting better in every aspect of the organization. Give me one aspect of the entire organization that hasn't improved over the past three seasons. There literally is no answer to that...there is nothing that hasn't gotten better...yet we're still bashed as if our organization is the most hopeless organization there is. Simply untrue. Yeah, I'm passionate about it, sue me.

    When Baird was the GM and our organization was actually a steaming pile of crap, I had no problem with the amount of hate we got and wrote about it right alongside with them..but it's simply not justified now. Yes, there have been some inefficient deals..but nothing close to as bad as everyone making it out to be. DM being fired as GM right now would simply be inexcusable given the progress he's made..but that's what everyone seems to think should happen now. Completely ridiculous.
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by KowboyKoop View Post
    Just to be clear, I'm not talking about your criticisms, that's why I didn't quote your post. I am talking about the media and famous bloggers and all that...and it's quite clear that whatever we do gets bashed no matter what. No other team gets criticized this much for bringing in a utility infielder.
    Eh, I'd criticize any team that signs Willie "Only Player in Baseball History to Get 46 hits and Only 1 Extra Base Hit" Bloomquist to a multi-million, multi-year deal.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Eh, I'd criticize any team that signs Willie "Only Player in Baseball History to Get 46 hits and Only 1 Extra Base Hit" Bloomquist to a multi-million, multi-year deal.
    It may not be a great deal, but it does seem a little silly to criticize such a minor deal.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by YEAH DAAAAWG View Post
    It may not be a great deal, but it does seem a little silly to criticize such a minor deal.
    As I said here:

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM
    The real problem with the deal isn't this deal in the isolation, but how it illustrates Dayton Moore's apparent lack of being able to evaluate major league talent. $11 million spent on Mike Jacobs, Horacio Ramirez, Willie Bloomquist, and Kyle Farnsworth
    And the BTF commenter I quoted:
    There is no need to pay a premium for this type of "production."

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    As I said here:



    And the BTF commenter I quoted:
    I understand, I was "just saying".
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Eh, I'd criticize any team that signs Willie "Only Player in Baseball History to Get 46 hits and Only 1 Extra Base Hit" Bloomquist to a multi-million, multi-year deal.
    That's fine, I'm not saying you can't, I'm saying I don't consider you to be in the "criticize literally everything about KC" group.
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Sounds good.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    I just remembered the guy the Royals already have that can fill Bloomquist's role and do it better - Esteban German. German, by all accounts, is now out of the picture. Bloomquist is faster, and a better defender, but German has a much better bat. German can easily fill the same role Bloomquist will. The defensive difference isn't that huge, except that Bloomquist can play shortstop while German can't.

    Using FanGraph's new "Win Values", Bloomquist's total career win value (in 7 years) is 0.6 wins above replacement. German, over his 3 years with Kansas City, has been worth 1.9 wins. The difference is the bat, where Bloomquist is atrocious and German is okay.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Royals Sign Bloomquist: 2 YR 3 Million

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I just remembered the guy the Royals already have that can fill Bloomquist's role and do it better - Esteban German. German, by all accounts, is now out of the picture. Bloomquist is faster, and a better defender, but German has a much better bat. German can easily fill the same role Bloomquist will. The defensive difference isn't that huge, except that Bloomquist can play shortstop while German can't.

    Using FanGraph's new "Win Values", Bloomquist's total career win value (in 7 years) is 0.6 wins above replacement. German, over his 3 years with Kansas City, has been worth 1.9 wins. The difference is the bat, where Bloomquist is atrocious and German is okay.
    They'll both be on the team. Bloomquist it taking Tony Pena Jr's spot. German was resigned to a one year deal, if I recall correctly. TPJ is out.

    It's not Bloomquist vs. German. It's Bloomquist vs. TPJ that leads to our team getting better. German can play 2B and 3B adequately, that's about it. Bloomquist, from what I gather, can play a lot more positions adequately..including SS. TPJ only plays SS (AND PITCHER!)
    My runs created per 27 posts (RC/27p) was 12.4 last year. I should've been MVP.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •