Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: REPORT: Giants Offer Manny Ramirez 4-Year Deal

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: REPORT: Giants Offer Manny Ramirez 4-Year Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by filihok View Post
    Does UZR factor in outfield throwing data? I think not
    Not currently. I assumed rogue9 was talking about his overall impression of Rowand's defense, and not just his throwing arm. But, as I said, since this is likely the first year that rogue9 saw a lot of Rowand, his overall impression of his defense does match up with at least one statistic. It doesn't match up with FRAA which has Rowand at +2 in 2008 (and +6, +4, +13, 0 in the years back through 2004). UZR, though, is a more advanced system than FRAA (currently. BP is in the process of incorporating Play-by-play data into FRAA for the years for which it's available).

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    805

    Re: REPORT: Giants Offer Manny Ramirez 4-Year Deal

    I was not using any statistical analysis, just my own eye. As I said, I saw Shierholtz make much better throws right after Rowand threw one off line several times. Rowand plays hard and tries every play, but it seemed like he was trying to hard to make something happen. My personal opinion is that he took too much personal responsibility for the team's losses and was trying to make up for it. And it seemed more often than not he ended up far off line with his throws home from deep center (in ATT), and make his characteristic diving plays, sometimes he'd come up good but others one of the corner out fielders would have to get the ball cause he was on the ground.

    I love that he trys his hardest every time, and hes got the right attitude, but he was not by any means very impressive in CF.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: REPORT: Giants Offer Manny Ramirez 4-Year Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by rogue9 View Post
    I was not using any statistical analysis, just my own eye.
    I know. I was just pointing out that your eye matches up perfectly with one of the more advanced defensive statistics.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •