Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 136

Thread: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavelb1 View Post
    Not at all....i can't figure out to do a team by team split, but just by eyeballing it, I can see their cumulative ERA+'s are very close.
    Glavine, 1005.1 IP, 107 ERA+
    Pedro, 486.2 IP, 108 ERA+

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    I don't care about ERA+. Glavine did better then Pedro with the Mets, and you are a fool if you think otherwise.
    He was better, because he was healthy, and thus pitched double the innings. In terms of quality while pitching, they were even.

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I never said that. But, you don't seem all that capable of looking beyond your team.
    To metsguy, their is the Mets, the Mets, The Mets, and the Mets. That is all there is. Maine is in his head, his eyes, his heart, blinding and paralyzing him, closing his mind...

    That is part of the John Maine song you wanted me to write. Yep, I wrote it


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    In terms of quality while pitching, they were even.
    Wrong. Pedro could barely throw a baseball whenever he came back from an injury. Glavine was our Number 1 starter for 2 years
    ]

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Wrong. Pedro could barely throw a baseball whenever he came back from an injury. Glavine was our Number 1 starter for 2 years
    Did 2005 get mysteriously erased from history?

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    856

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Did 2005 get mysteriously erased from history?
    I'm just pounding my head for allowing myself to get drawn into this. The plus side of these discussions is it lets me look stuff up I was either unaware or periphrially (sp) aware of.

    btw Houston what website lets you split up by teams like that? I can't find it on baseball ref.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavelb1 View Post
    btw Houston what website lets you split up by teams like that? I can't find it on baseball ref.
    I used Baseball-Reference's Play Index to show me the stats of players from the years that Glavine and (separate search) Pedro pitched for the Mets, and then found Glavine and Pedro in the list. PI requires a subscription to get full results though.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    I dont know why I bother talking to metsguy.... its impossible
    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


  8. #83
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Okay, I've taken a closer look at the 14 pitchers in the list, using ERA+, WARP3, Peak WARP3, DERA, PRAA, and PRAR. This is my revised ranking:

    1) Roger Clemens
    2) Greg Maddux
    3) Tom Seaver
    4) Randy Johnson
    5) Warren Spahn
    6) Steve Carlton
    7) Pedro Martinez
    8) Gaylord Perry
    9) Tom Glavine
    10) Sandy Koufax
    11) Nolan Ryan
    12) Phil Niekro
    13) Don Sutton
    14) Early Wynn

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,016

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Okay, I've taken a closer look at the 14 pitchers in the list, using ERA+, WARP3, Peak WARP3, DERA, PRAA, and PRAR. This is my revised ranking:

    1) Roger Clemens
    2) Greg Maddux
    3) Tom Seaver
    4) Randy Johnson
    5) Warren Spahn
    6) Steve Carlton
    7) Pedro Martinez
    8) Gaylord Perry
    9) Tom Glavine
    10) Sandy Koufax
    11) Nolan Ryan
    12) Phil Niekro
    13) Don Sutton
    14) Early Wynn
    That's funny - my list is the same except for Pedro and Koufax being flopped and Sutton and Niekro.

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    3

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by FRENCHREDSOX View Post
    Again mistaken HGM - I am sorry to say - if Clemens has ANY result,even if it is 1 inning affected by his usage of an illicit substance then automatically it is no longer an objective comparison but de facto becomes a subjective one.
    I really don't care if CLemens took steriods or not, he had to pitch against hitters that did, even HOF hitters that did. Everybody did it, he played within the rules of the game at the time. It is the same as saying if somebody had an advantage of working out vs not. Everybody played by the same rules, they choose if they wanted to do Steriods or not...

    Steriods doesn't not help a person hit a ball nor pitch. You still have to have the talent to do so.

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,151

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    1-Clemens
    2-Seaver
    3-Maddux
    4-Johnson
    5-Martinez
    6-Koufax
    7-Spahn
    8-Carlton
    9-Glavine
    10-Perry
    11-Ryan
    12-Niekro
    13-Sutton
    14-Wynn

    Without checking stats. I would personally find a place for Palmer, Gibson, Marichal, and maybe (probably) some others.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    They also leave out a lot of other good options (Bob Gibson, Jim Palmer, Bert Blyleven, Robin Roberts, Mussina, Bob Feller possibly depending on the cutoff, Whitey Ford...)
    Yeah, that's one thing I don't like about a lot of ESPN poll--they leave out obvious choices.

    I only put 10 guys on my list, to make room for guys who weren't even choices, but who IMO are in the top 14:

    1 Clemens
    2 Maddux
    3 Spahn
    4 Johnson
    5 Koufax
    6 Seaver
    7 Carlton
    8 Martinez
    9 Glavine
    10 Neikro

    Just to clarify, if Bob Gibson, for example, had been a possible choice, he'd be in the top 5--I don't want to imply that I'd rate Neikro ahead of him.

    Also, I did my voting quickly, without analysing it a lot. If I had taken more time and thought about it more, my list might be a bit different, though I'm pretty sure my top 3 would be the same.

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,151

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    It looks like they picked all the 300 game winners, along with a couple guys who had very high peaks (Martinez, Koufax). Well, and Johnson too, and he should get the 300 son.

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, ON
    Posts
    1,353

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by boomboom View Post
    I really don't care if CLemens took steriods or not, he had to pitch against hitters that did, even HOF hitters that did. Everybody did it, he played within the rules of the game at the time. It is the same as saying if somebody had an advantage of working out vs not. Everybody played by the same rules, they choose if they wanted to do Steriods or not...
    That's fine - I agree with you here.
    Steriods doesn't not help a person hit a ball nor pitch. You still have to have the talent to do so.
    And this just isn't true. Steroids help - all I need for proof that they help is that so many players took them. How much do they help? That is a question for which we are unlikely to ever know the answer. As for when a player started using steroids - the absence of proof, or the absence of a change in their statistical record doesn't show anything close to a standard of proof.

    If a person wants to downgrade where they rank a pitcher because of steroid use, that is a subjective assessment. But any list of the top pitchers is a subjective ranking, by definition, which is why it is interesting.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    2,346

    Re: Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Pedro proved he can't pitch when alot is on the line, like when his team is good
    Well, he never had to worry about that when he was with the Mets.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •