Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
(Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
I'm just pounding my head for allowing myself to get drawn into this. The plus side of these discussions is it lets me look stuff up I was either unaware or periphrially (sp) aware of.
btw Houston what website lets you split up by teams like that? I can't find it on baseball ref.
I dont know why I bother talking to metsguy.... its impossible
The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they didMy Finest work!!!
haveacigar
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
Okay, I've taken a closer look at the 14 pitchers in the list, using ERA+, WARP3, Peak WARP3, DERA, PRAA, and PRAR. This is my revised ranking:
1) Roger Clemens
2) Greg Maddux
3) Tom Seaver
4) Randy Johnson
5) Warren Spahn
6) Steve Carlton
7) Pedro Martinez
8) Gaylord Perry
9) Tom Glavine
10) Sandy Koufax
11) Nolan Ryan
12) Phil Niekro
13) Don Sutton
14) Early Wynn
I really don't care if CLemens took steriods or not, he had to pitch against hitters that did, even HOF hitters that did. Everybody did it, he played within the rules of the game at the time. It is the same as saying if somebody had an advantage of working out vs not. Everybody played by the same rules, they choose if they wanted to do Steriods or not...
Steriods doesn't not help a person hit a ball nor pitch. You still have to have the talent to do so.
1-Clemens
2-Seaver
3-Maddux
4-Johnson
5-Martinez
6-Koufax
7-Spahn
8-Carlton
9-Glavine
10-Perry
11-Ryan
12-Niekro
13-Sutton
14-Wynn
Without checking stats. I would personally find a place for Palmer, Gibson, Marichal, and maybe (probably) some others.
Yeah, that's one thing I don't like about a lot of ESPN poll--they leave out obvious choices.
I only put 10 guys on my list, to make room for guys who weren't even choices, but who IMO are in the top 14:
1 Clemens
2 Maddux
3 Spahn
4 Johnson
5 Koufax
6 Seaver
7 Carlton
8 Martinez
9 Glavine
10 Neikro
Just to clarify, if Bob Gibson, for example, had been a possible choice, he'd be in the top 5--I don't want to imply that I'd rate Neikro ahead of him.
Also, I did my voting quickly, without analysing it a lot. If I had taken more time and thought about it more, my list might be a bit different, though I'm pretty sure my top 3 would be the same.
It looks like they picked all the 300 game winners, along with a couple guys who had very high peaks (Martinez, Koufax). Well, and Johnson too, and he should get the 300 son.
That's fine - I agree with you here.
And this just isn't true. Steroids help - all I need for proof that they help is that so many players took them. How much do they help? That is a question for which we are unlikely to ever know the answer. As for when a player started using steroids - the absence of proof, or the absence of a change in their statistical record doesn't show anything close to a standard of proof.Steriods doesn't not help a person hit a ball nor pitch. You still have to have the talent to do so.
If a person wants to downgrade where they rank a pitcher because of steroid use, that is a subjective assessment. But any list of the top pitchers is a subjective ranking, by definition, which is why it is interesting.