Re: Interleague Play

Originally Posted by
beerchaser
As for interleague, I can take it or leave it. Don't hate it but not that excited about it either. But for anyone who thinks the NL should adopt the DH......
Irrepressible grin....at the cat picture(and the cute caption).
I'm for interleague play...apart from the prospect of various "derbies" (subway series; Cubs v White Sox; etc), it would settle some arguments over which giants of which league would prevail over the heroes of t'other league.
If I had my druthers, I'd arrange the schedule so that each N.L team would play a series with each A.L.during a season.
Sure, this would mean that each team would have to play over 200 games per (extended) season, but that way, the baseball fans would get more bang for their buck, those ball-playing millionaires would have to work a bit harder for theirs, and those profligate owners could throw away their bucks on domed stadia.
As I see it, the baseball season would end in October, as now, take a break in the Fall -so ensuring minimum competition with Football -the baseball Franchises doing all their paperwork; conferences; "Spring Training" (within those domed stadiums); etc, in the period November through January - then begin the next season on February 1st.
I look forward to the BM version which affords the ability for us to arrange our own schedules, in order to try out this theory
Last edited by Rongar; 12-14-2008 at 09:50 AM.
"Whate'er should be our Zodiac's star
We all are born to make or mar.
To each is gi'en a bag of tools
Some mentors, and a set of rules:
And each must carve, ere life has flown,
A stumbling block, or a stepping-stone"
(Author unknown)
Generation 35.
"Spikes" The cleats on baseball boots
"Spikes" On which newspaper editors impale copy for future reference, or ultimate destruction.