Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    South Park, CO
    Posts
    2,908

    MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/prospects/y2009/
    Rasmus #10 so does this mean he stay in St.Louis?
    Lakers/Cardinals/Patriots/Penguins


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Abington, PA
    Posts
    758

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    yea Lou Marson and Carlos Carrasco are listed!! But where's Jason Donald?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pullman, WA
    Posts
    5,156

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Carlos Triunfel at 30 and Aumont at 33. Sounds good for the M's.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    haha, no yankees.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Uptown Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,433

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Jesus Montero at #40 is a Yankee, but that's the only one.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Quote Originally Posted by BINGLEBOP View Post
    Jesus Montero at #40 is a Yankee, but that's the only one.
    yeah.......their farm isn't overrated though.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    yeah.......their farm isn't overrated though.
    It's probably worth noting that two of their top prospects, one of whom would've undoubtedly placed in the top 10, are no longer considered prospects (Chamberlain and Kennedy).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    805

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    I'm happy to see 3 Giants on there. I wonder how far Alderson is from that list.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    396

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    The Red Sox only have one probably because all the rest have already played in the majors like Masterson, Chris Carter, and that other pitcher with the cool last name...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    223

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Isn't there 2 yankees?

    Jackson/Montero

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    932

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Quote Originally Posted by 5DiMaggio View Post
    Isn't there 2 yankees?

    Jackson/Montero
    Lol, yes, how embarrassing of one of the previous posters... Trying to tell everyone how overrated the Yankees farm system is, but doesn't know enough about baseball to tell that the Yanks have 2 prospects in the top 50 list, while the Sawx have 1...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    So...we're now judging farm systems based on an arbitrary list of the top 50 prospects by a few writers or whatever at mlb.com?? Sweet....two Royals on that list...guess our farm system is better than the Red Sox.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    198

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Matt Wieters is #2... Sweet

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Quote Originally Posted by KowboyKoop View Post
    So...we're now judging farm systems based on an arbitrary list of the top 50 prospects by a few writers or whatever at mlb.com?? Sweet....two Royals on that list...guess our farm system is better than the Red Sox.
    This is exactly why I posted what I did. To highlight the rediculousness of these kind of rankings and to nudge a little snide shot at the Yanks. I really don't know 99% of the names, for all I knew there could be 12 Yanks up there lol.

    I'd venture 80-90% of those names never have a quality season 'full' season in the pros.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: MLB.com Top 50 Prospects

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    This is exactly why I posted what I did. To highlight the rediculousness of these kind of rankings and to nudge a little snide shot at the Yanks. I really don't know 99% of the names, for all I knew there could be 12 Yanks up there lol.

    I'd venture 80-90% of those names never have a quality season 'full' season in the pros.
    That last statement is pretty false, I'd say. That list may or may not be entirely accurate.....but there's some pretty damn good prospects there. I'd say 20% of them will EASILY have solid major league careers...much less have one good season.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •