Who's going to win, they will be announced today
I believe both are no brainers and both should be unanimous choices.
NL- Soto
AL- Longoria
Who's going to win, they will be announced today
I believe both are no brainers and both should be unanimous choices.
NL- Soto
AL- Longoria
Agreed
lol agreed
The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they didMy Finest work!!!
haveacigar
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
Yeah, there shouldn't be any surprises here.
When ESPN's "experts" unanimously pick one of the awards, and come damn close to unanimously picking the other (shame on the two that picked Alexei Ramirez!), you know it's obvious.
I say
AL: Longoria
NL: Soto, but Votto has been overlooked
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
(Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
Longoria and Soto will win, but Votto and Ramirez should take some votes away from both.
Active Dynasty
An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox
Paused Dynasty
Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty
I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.
Poor Votto... he picked a bad time to be a rookie.
As expected.
Longoria won unanimously. Alexei Ramirez placed 2nd, Jacoby Ellsbury 3rd, and Mike Aviles and Armando Galarraga were tired for fourth.
Soto got 31 of the 32 first place votes (Votto got the other 1st place vote). Votto was second, and Jair Jurrjens was third. For some reason, the BBWAA allowed the 3 second-place votes to Edinson Volquez to count, even though he was NOT a rookie, and Volquez, not a rookie, placed 4th in the Rookie of the Year voting.As Rotoworld said, apparently nobody in the BBWAA cares to make sure that the writers turn in legal ballots.
I thought he wasn't eligible.![]()
Oops, didn't notice the 'ROY thread'. I found my answer there.![]()
It is simple, the BBWA is idiotic
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
(Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
Merged the threads.
And yeah, the BBWAA just doesn't care if its voters follow the rules, apparantly.
Full NL results - James Loney also got a vote despite not being close to being eligible. Oddly enough, the disclaimer that Edinson Volquez received votes despite not being eligible wasn't also put on James Loney.
EDIT: Loney was actually MLB.com's mistake. He did not receive any votes. MLB.com made an error in including him in the table. From BaseballThinkFactory:
EDIT2: And they've now fixed the Loney error.Loney finished seventh (tied for sixth with Yunel Escobar, actually) last year, with one third place vote. Whoever compiled that table just replaced the top six rows with this year's six vote-getters and accidentally left Loney's row in there.
Full AL results - Surprise! Everybody that got votes was actually eligible!
LOL @ Keith Law's blog entry:
Oh and A+ to this comment on that entry:Edinson Volquez appears on three NL Rookie of the Year ballots, even though he’s not a rookie. It wasn’t even something esoteric like the days-on-the-roster rule; he threw 80 innings for Texas prior to 2008, and the cutoff is 50.
I think the truth about my rejected membership is that I failed the board’s intelligence test - I have some.
What’s worse: that he appeared on three ballots or that those three (thinking he was actually eligible) didn’t vote him first?