Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Jackson,TN
    Posts
    1,090

    NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    Who's going to win, they will be announced today

    I believe both are no brainers and both should be unanimous choices.

    NL- Soto

    AL- Longoria

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Republic of Georgia
    Posts
    12,385

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    lol agreed
    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    Yeah, there shouldn't be any surprises here.

    When ESPN's "experts" unanimously pick one of the awards, and come damn close to unanimously picking the other (shame on the two that picked Alexei Ramirez!), you know it's obvious.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    I say

    AL: Longoria
    NL: Soto, but Votto has been overlooked


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    Longoria and Soto will win, but Votto and Ramirez should take some votes away from both.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,447

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    Poor Votto... he picked a bad time to be a rookie.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    As expected.

    Longoria won unanimously. Alexei Ramirez placed 2nd, Jacoby Ellsbury 3rd, and Mike Aviles and Armando Galarraga were tired for fourth.

    Soto got 31 of the 32 first place votes (Votto got the other 1st place vote). Votto was second, and Jair Jurrjens was third. For some reason, the BBWAA allowed the 3 second-place votes to Edinson Volquez to count, even though he was NOT a rookie, and Volquez, not a rookie, placed 4th in the Rookie of the Year voting. As Rotoworld said, apparently nobody in the BBWAA cares to make sure that the writers turn in legal ballots.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    7,283

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    Poor Volquez. Maybe he'll do better and win next year.

    Quote Originally Posted by gleklufdshlaw View Post
    Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,154

    Why did some people vote for Edinson Volquez as NL ROY?

    I thought he wasn't eligible.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,154

    Re: Why did some people vote for Edinson Volquez as NL ROY?

    Oops, didn't notice the 'ROY thread'. I found my answer there.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Why did some people vote for Edinson Volquez as NL ROY?

    It is simple, the BBWA is idiotic


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    Merged the threads.

    And yeah, the BBWAA just doesn't care if its voters follow the rules, apparantly.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    Full NL results - James Loney also got a vote despite not being close to being eligible. Oddly enough, the disclaimer that Edinson Volquez received votes despite not being eligible wasn't also put on James Loney.

    EDIT: Loney was actually MLB.com's mistake. He did not receive any votes. MLB.com made an error in including him in the table. From BaseballThinkFactory:
    Loney finished seventh (tied for sixth with Yunel Escobar, actually) last year, with one third place vote. Whoever compiled that table just replaced the top six rows with this year's six vote-getters and accidentally left Loney's row in there.
    EDIT2: And they've now fixed the Loney error.

    Full AL results - Surprise! Everybody that got votes was actually eligible!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: NL & AL Rookies of the Year

    LOL @ Keith Law's blog entry:

    Edinson Volquez appears on three NL Rookie of the Year ballots, even though he’s not a rookie. It wasn’t even something esoteric like the days-on-the-roster rule; he threw 80 innings for Texas prior to 2008, and the cutoff is 50.

    I think the truth about my rejected membership is that I failed the board’s intelligence test - I have some.
    Oh and A+ to this comment on that entry:
    What’s worse: that he appeared on three ballots or that those three (thinking he was actually eligible) didn’t vote him first?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •