Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 90

Thread: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    Moore atleast has some direction to the team
    Mediocrity?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Mediocrity?
    That is better then what they have been


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  3. #18
    defense Guest

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by rockiesfan4ever View Post
    They said the main reason for the deal is the Royals NEEDED a Power bat.
    They need a lot of things. Doesn't mean they should be making bad trades

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pangea
    Posts
    6,795

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Hey, i was just saying what the paper said
    Quote Originally Posted by President View Post
    For some reason I thought rockies was a big black guy.

    I was wrong.
    Back at this dynasty thing again: Resurrecting The Rockies: 2001 Onward

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Rob Neyer on the trade/Dayton Moore:

    Moore repeated on-base percentage 29 times in one interview. Dayton Moore gets it, finally … until his very first significant offseason move, when he acquires an everyday player who will, more than anything, be a drag on the team's on-base percentage. This is exactly the sort of thing the Royals would have done 20 years ago -- those teams were perennially OBP-challenged, too -- which, come to think of it, makes a lot of sense because the man making the moves 20 years ago was John Schuerholz. Moore's mentor before he got his job with the Royals? John Schuerholz.

    Moore was supposed to build Schuerholz's winning Braves of the 1990s. But instead he's rebuilding Schuerholz's losing Royals of the late 1980s and early '90s. And we had such high hopes for the young man.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by BrewCrewFan255 View Post
    On MLBtrade rumors a writer said this

    Jazayerli considers the Royals acquiring Jacobs a terrible idea, and worries that it could lead to a Billy Butler trade.
    Here is Rany's full take on trading for Mike Jacobs...written before the trade became official, but that changes nothing. Warning: It might as well be a book,

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Bad trade for Florida. A very good young 1B for.... Leo Nunez?
    ]

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Bad trade for Florida. A very good young 1B for.... Leo Nunez?


    Mike Jacobs is not very good, NOR is he young.

    Leo Nunez is a very good, young reliever.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Republic of Georgia
    Posts
    12,385

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Relievers come pretty cheap. I don't think Nunez is the next MoRiv or anything. In the long run this deal probably ends up as a wash

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post


    Mike Jacobs is not very good, NOR is he young.

    Leo Nunez is a very good, young reliever.
    Mike Jacobs is 28. And he's quite good.

    Leo Nunez, I've never heard of.
    ]

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    280

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Mike Jacobs isn't a stud, nor is he a dud, he will provide you good power but that's all he provides. He hit .230 last year and had 30 homer's, to me he's an all or nothing type of player, on top of that he isn't a gold-glove 1B, but he is a lefty and the Royals really have nothing to loose here.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    Mike Jacobs is 28. And he's quite good.
    28 is not young for a first basemen with old player skills.

    He's also not "quite good." He's terrible defensively, has negative baserunning value, never walks, and can't hit lefties. He'd be okay as a platoon DH against righties, because power is his only skill.

    Leo Nunez, I've never heard of.
    Educate yourself.

    24 year old reliever, solid performance so far in the majors the last 2 years.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Uptown Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,433

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Gaby Sanchez's minor league numbers... he has pop in his bat and decent speed, but he'll be making the jump from AA. He also played some at third base and catcher.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by BINGLEBOP View Post
    Gaby Sanchez's minor league numbers... he has pop in his bat and decent speed, but he'll be making the jump from AA. He also played some at third base and catcher.
    Actually, he seems to be either slower then he thinks he is or a stupid baserunner. He barely triples, and gets caught stealing too much. Not that he is slow, but he definately is being used badly in running terms. His versibilty could make him pretty useful, he has stats that may fit better as a 2nd or 3rd baseman in the long run


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Under your mom
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Marlins send Jacobs to Royals

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post


    Mike Jacobs is not very good, NOR is he young.

    Leo Nunez is a very good, young reliever.
    Sorry, but you're wrong on this one. Leo Nunez is insanely skinny...go look up a picture of him. Then watch his motion. He is EXTREMELY injury prone. He didn't even have great K or BB numbers last year when he was available to pitch. His control is often erratic.

    Now, Jacobs certainly isn't without flaw..but he has a career OPS+ of 110 while playing in a big ballpark. I fail to see how this is a bad trade for the Royals. Everyone says we have a huge logjam of similar players? Uhhh..as a diehard Royals fan, I'd love to hear about this wonderful problem we have. Kila Kaaihue has had ONE good year in the minors in his career. Billy Butler, while full of potential, wasn't that great last year. Ryan Shealy had one good month last year and has more leg injuries in his past than I can possibly count. The last guy is Ross Gload, who is a waste of a good uniform.

    Mike Jacobs isn't a great hitter, but he's a pretty decent one..and getting a pretty decent hitter for a decent reliever who is a gigantic injury risk every single year...I don't see how we lose this one. Leo couldn't even strike out 5 batters per 9 innings as a reliever last year..that's pathetic for supposedly having amazing stuff. Again...Jacob's isn't great, but you guys are MASSIVELY overrating Leo Nunez..a guy none of you have probably ever heard of before this (and deservedly so..he's simply decent).


    Also...I just can't understand how you say that Ryan Shealy and Kila Kaaihue are better than Mike Jacobs.......I don't understand that one at all. Kila has had one good minor league season and will be starting in AAA next year to prove it wasn't a fluke...and Shealy...uh...can you provide any evidence that he's already better than Mike Jacobs?? He did have one good month.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •