That's because you're looking at it from a reverse angle from me, and this is probably because of my age and preference to old school baseball. You're looking at the fact that the bullpen blowing the lead shouldn't matter because the starter would've won if they hadn't blown up. Me, I look at like if you're a really good pitcher, you go deeper into a game and don't let the bullpen have as much of an impact.
Take Pitcher A who leaves 20 games after 6 innings with a 1 run lead, and Pitcher B who leaves 20 games after 8 innings with a 1 run lead. Both have similar ERA's, WHIP's, etc.
The only major stat that would end up much different in this scenario would be wins, as Pitcher B is almost certainly (I'd be willing to bet lots of money on it) going to end up with quite a few more wins. Now, it wasn't Pitcher A's fault, right? The bullpen blew it, right? Well, yeah, true, but Pitcher B is still better IMO. Much, much, much better IMO.
In the case of Hamels, it's not the lack of WINS that turns me off, its the lack of innings. Yeah, I know, it wasn't his fault it rained, but it did rain. And I know today's game is different. And to me, that just proves the pitchers like Seaver, Maddox in his prime, Carlton, etc. who pitched more deeply into games (thus minimizing chances of blown leads) had better chances of more wins, and were, IMNSHO, much better pitchers.
But, Hamels won, it's over, and I'm wrong again. No big news there. I'll be wrong again. But given the chance, I still just wouldn't vote for Hamels even though it wasn't his fault it rained and it wasn't his fault the bullpen blew the lead. But, I'm on the minority side of opinions on almost everything anyway.




Reply With Quote

We can be brutal, but when things go our way, we just love everyone!
