was she a hot reporter? if so, good for him.
Yay! I hope they bring him back! He was awesome!
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
(Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
that'd be a very long limb. There have been plenty who have done that. But it does add to the "character issues" surrounding Lowe. Makes no difference to me though, I'd be fine with it if he decides to come back to LA at a reasonable price, but from what I've heard I don't think that's going to happen. The Dodgers will have to find pitching elsewhere.
Dude, I really don't know if I'd be getting all hot and bothered over Burnett. He pitched through the pain this year because he knew money was on the line. In past years, at every little twinge (and with the number if arm surgeries he's already had, he feels twinges A LOT) he shuts himself down. I wouldn't be too eager to grab Burnett.
So...what...the owners who agree to these contracts are somehow forced in to it? Nope, they sign these stupid deals of their own free will. Blame idiot GMs and owners for caving in or signing ridiculous contracts.Originally Posted by phightinphils
No, blame the fans for giving the owners the money, thereby allowing players to ask for more money.
It really pains me every time this topic comes up. It's pretty damn simple. If the players weren't being given ridiculous amounts of money, that money would just simply be in the pockets of the owners. The players are just getting their share of the ridiculous profits that WE, THE FANS, provide.
It's not ruining professional baseball. It's a sign that professional baseball is thriving.
That's what it comes down to for me. If every team in baseball would have told Alex Rodriguez and Scott Boras to take a hike when he asked for a quarter of a billion dollars eight years ago, they would have lowered their demands, but Tom Hicks said yes. There's no hypnosis or trickery there... GM's and owners have the right to say "thanks but no thanks". I NEVER fault the players for going where the money is, because in any other profession on earth, somebody would be questioned or criticized for not taking the pay increase. I don't know anybody here that would turn down more money for less money.
Sure, you have "hometown" players (who were brought up through the farm system, not who actually grew up in the city) say that they want to spend their career with the team, but all players say that. It's good, positive PR. They shouldn't say anything else! Then when they're free agents, every destination is "one at the top of their list". In those cases, when they turn their back on their "hometown" team for one that offered a larger contract, I understand people get upset, but that's the reality of it. Players put themselves (and their families) first, and usually at the top of the list is the team that offers the most money.
Yep, very good point. Professional sports is the only profession where I've ever heard of people being criticized for wanting to earn more. I guess it's because most sports fans are "average Joes" and it's hard to comprehend the amount of money athletes make, but still, it's basically hypocrisy, as most people know damn well that if presented with the opportunity to make $100+ million, they'd fall all over themselves trying to take it.