Or...white people.Originally Posted by metsguy234
o
Or...white people.
╝+┼╣,►ΘΩδ
Only formally. In conversation, we call them whites 99% of the time. I hate political correctness, it is SO obnoxious.
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
(Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
Song of Solomon 5:4
But it is best not to judge or offend people based on the color of their skin.
]
Cardinals Fan
can we get Back to TBS
Lakers/Cardinals/Patriots/Penguins
o
Calling people white or black is not judging anyone, and it only offends those obsessed with the nonsense that is extreme political correctness.
╝+┼╣,►ΘΩδ
But basically NO ONE gets offended by being called Black or White! It is the people of opposite coloration who get all crazy about it. I am Native American, but I do not mind being called an Indian. You are not black, so do not tell us what to call them
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
Cardinals Fan
one again my post is ingored here:
Why does every theard go down hill when Metsguy and RedsoxRockies post in it?
Lakers/Cardinals/Patriots/Penguins
Song of Solomon 5:4
But it is comparing a person's skin to a color. A person is a person, not a color.
]
o
A person's skin has a color. It's not "comparing a person's skin to a color". It's...saying the color of the person's skin.
Song of Solomon 5:4
Native American/Indian is a bit different. It's not racist, it's just... geographically incorrect. It's just used because Columbus was a dumbass and thought North America was India.
]
Song of Solomon 5:4
But it's grouping people based on the color of their skin. That's wrong.A person's skin has a color. It's not "comparing a person's skin to a color". It's...saying the color of the person's skin.
]
Cardinals Fan
read this
Lakers/Cardinals/Patriots/Penguins
o
So, you get to pick and choose which classifications are racist and which are not? And using a person's skin color is more racist than referring to a race as a race that they aren't?
╝+┼╣,►ΘΩδ
No it is not. I have Tan skin. If someone called me tan, I do not care. or white, or Indian, Or whatever!!! How is it wrong when it is the truth? And in truth, it is more truthful! Many black americans were born elsewhere, yet people call them African Americans. That is incorrect, as they were born in another country. Now drop it
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
Song of Solomon 5:4
Well, i'm just saying... calling people "black" or "white" is grouping them based on their skin color... calling a Native American an "Indian" is less racist, because the term has been carried down from that dumbass Christopher Columbus, and it's not grouping them based on the color of their skin.So, you get to pick and choose which classifications are racist and which are not? And using a person's skin color is more racist than referring to a race as a race that they aren't?
]
