...whereas, all other things are equal (as they share a like stadium).
Including:
Fan Base
Fan Income
Stadium Capacity (obviously, as this is shared)
Any explanation for this?
Just a curious thought.
...whereas, all other things are equal (as they share a like stadium).
Including:
Fan Base
Fan Income
Stadium Capacity (obviously, as this is shared)
Any explanation for this?
Just a curious thought.
What's the confusion? The fan base and fan income are geographic - and since they play in the same stadium the game assumes their fans are identical.
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
NY, NJ, I just don't see how these two could have anything significantly different.
That's all.
uh, well... there are Giants fans, and there are Jets fans. There's obviously some overlap, but it's hardly 100%.
You originally posted this in bug reports though, so the main thing that I don't understand is what the potential bug is that you're bringing up here?
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
It's a matter of, same stadium, same data.
The fan loyalty and franchise value will be different because they're different franchises. I don't see what the issue is. I live out in Los Angeles where the Los Angeles Lakers & Los Angeles Clippers both share the Staples Center. Same fan base, same fan income, same stadium capacity. However, this town is about 90-10 in favor of the Lakers. There is far more Lakers fan loyalty than Clippers.
Same applies for Giants/Jets.
I'd say Giants vs Jets fan loyalty is MUCH more even than Lakers vs Clippers