Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
(Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
Wait wait wait....i admit i know nothing about the NL, so I had to look into why a guy with so many HR's and RBI's (and no I don't think RBI's OR wins should be tossed out the window, those opportunities have to be cashed in you know) shouldn't even merit consideration....and I agree he shouldn't be MVP this year.
BUT
In no way is 2006 a 'steal'. Very good BA, fantastic OBA, second in slugging, second in OPS, first in total bases, first in HR's missed Maris's record (yes it's still his) by three. First in times on base. Now maybe Pujols is right up there with him in 2006, but there's no way that's a 'steal'.
Howard hit .313/.425/.659 with 58 HR and 149 RBI, 167 OPS+. Pujols hit .331/.431/.671 with 49 HR and 137 RBI, 178 OPS+. You have to adjust for context to get a proper hold on their value. Pujols played in a neutral park, which maybe slightly favored pitchers. Howard's park was very favorable to hitter's.
Then, you also have to factor in defense. Pujols is the top defensive first basemen in the game. Howard is near the bottom of the league.
Better offense, once context is accounted for, and vastly superior defense, makes it not close. Howard won because he put up sexier counting numbers.