Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Brewers in first

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    137

    Brewers in first

    The brewers are tied for first place. First time since early april. This season feels totally different from last. last year we had the great start then struggled. Everybody was kinda waiting for us to choke and we did. This year feels alot different. We entered this year with an "anything less than a playoff berth is a disappointment" attitude. We got off to a bad start and there was alot of rumors about Yost job and such. We got hot, have made a couple of deals and we are the talk of baseball right now. I feel we are destined for the playoffs and am dreaming of a world championship. Big series starting monday against the Cubs. I am obvioudly biased. &these are great times for many Brewers fans, but I was wondering what other people think of our chances this year? Alot of people, even after the CC trade said the cubs were still better. Do people still think that?.
    Last edited by Frijolito; 07-27-2008 at 10:37 AM. Reason: typos

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    airstrip one, oceania
    Posts
    9,272

    Re: Brewers in first


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Brewers in first

    The Cubs are still better. I think that the Cubs will win the division and Milwaukee the Wild Card. I also think that the Brewers have a better shot at going deep into the playoffs once they make it than the Cubs do.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,224

    Re: Brewers in first

    I still cant figure out why everyone thinks the Cubs are so great. ESPN wont shut up about it. Outside of a couple bats and pitchers, they are not that good. My opine is that the Brewers are actually better as long as the young players keep it up.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Edison, NJ
    Posts
    15,636

    Re: Brewers in first

    Their the "lovable losers".
    You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Brewers in first

    Yay! Milwaukee is way better than Chicago! Go Brew Crew!


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    No. Va., Loudoun County
    Posts
    2,620

    Re: Brewers in first

    Starting pitching, starting pitching, starting pitching.

    Cubs win the division.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Brewers in first

    Quote Originally Posted by grasshopper View Post
    I still cant figure out why everyone thinks the Cubs are so great.
    Because they are very, very good.

    Outside of a couple bats and pitchers, they are not that good.
    They are second in the majors with 540 runs scored. They are tenth in the majors in fewest runs allowed with 433. They are first in the majors in run differential, having outscored their opponents by 107 runs.

    They have a team OPS+ of 110 and an ERA+ of 117.

    A "couple" bats? I count their entire starting lineup as being above average hitters. A "couple" pitchers? I see 3 great (this year) pitchers - Ryan Dempster, Carlos Zambrano, Rich Harden. I see two league-average pitchers - Ted Lilly and Jason Marquis. I see a very good closer - Kerry Wood - and a very good setup man - Carlos Marmol.

    Yeah, um, this is one of the best teams in the league.

    The Brewers are up there too, but they have more holes than the Cubs. They've been getting poor production from catcher, second base, and third base. Their bullpen is shakier. The top 3 of their rotation matches up rather evenly to the Cubs, maybe slightly better, but Suppan/Bush/McClung are worse than Lilly/Marquis.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    No. Va., Loudoun County
    Posts
    2,620

    Re: Brewers in first

    Wow, I'm seeing Semarnja (unsure of spelling) for the first time. If there was any question about this kid, you can put it to rest.

    This guy throws in the mid 90's, his fastball has natural movement left to right (great against lefties) of a good 3 inches, and he just threw two of the nastiest splitters I've seen since the heyday of Gagne when he was so dominant. Made Hanley Ramirez look like me.

    No, I'm not suggesting this is the next Gagne, but this kid has got the STUFF. Man, that's as impressed as I've been with young pitcher lately. Great, great stuff, and good control. The only drawback I've seen in the two times I've seen him pitch is that nasty splitter isn't consistent yet, he's left a couple of them up and straight.

    Wow, but man this kid looks good. Wasn't he a good college football player too?? Notre Dame or someone else??

    EDIT: And, oh BTW, it looks like the Cubs are back in first place alone, though the Brewers game isn't over yet.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Brewers in first

    Receiver for Notre Dame. Underwhelming minor league stats though.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    No. Va., Loudoun County
    Posts
    2,620

    Re: Brewers in first

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Receiver for Notre Dame. Underwhelming minor league stats though.

    Yeah, that's it. That first good year that new coach had with them right?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Brewers in first

    No idea. Don't follow football, college or otherwise. lol

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    airstrip one, oceania
    Posts
    9,272

    Re: Brewers in first

    Quote Originally Posted by OldFatGuy View Post
    Yeah, that's it. That first good year that new coach had with them right?
    only good year they've had under Weiss, and they got hammered in their bowl game

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Brewers in first

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Receiver for Notre Dame. Underwhelming minor league stats though.
    Veeery Over Rated


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Jackson,TN
    Posts
    1,090

    Re: Brewers in first

    Veeery Over Rated
    As a pitcher or college receiver? He was a very good college receiver but wouldn't make much of a pro receiver, he would have been a better TE if he added some weight. In college he could use his height to a big advantage, but his lack of speed would kill him in the NFL.

    Underwhelming minor league stats though.
    Minor league stats don't mean everything when it comes to development of players. There's been ton of players who put up great minor league numbers who never make it in the pros and there are guys who played terrible in the minors but blossomed in the pros

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •