Actually, I'm pretty sure you're correct in that this is what MLB GM's fear. The publicity winds, fickle as they are, do seem to be starting to shift slightly though. I doubt that he'll get signed this year, but if he puts his legal issues behind him I'm betting someone might pick him up next season.
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
Next year he'll be a year older. One year removed from playing baseball. Maybe a year healthier. And as much of a distraction.
I think (hope) we've seen the end of B*nds
I wouldn't be so certain of that. There's already been some positive press for him (of the "I miss Bonds" type), recently.
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
It is the same Richie Sexson that has a .370OBP since he changed his stance.
THIS IS A GOOD MOVE BY THE YANKS.
It doesn't cost that much money, but the worst part is that Sexson should still be a Mariner, and Vidro should have been the one cut.
[QUOTE=RickD;1120318]I HATE THE YANKEES, GO SOX!QUOTE]
RickD the wise! Glad to see ya come over!
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72
(Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)
Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."
Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:
2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score
2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!
Yeah......right........
That's not the (only) reason why he walks a lot.
I think that the whole issue with Bonds throwing clubhouse chemistry into chaos is always a media-created thing. Sure, his team would have to deal with the media outrage, but there's never been any actual real evidence about Bonds being a "clubhouse cancer" that destroys the team, at least none that I've heard from. The Giants did fine with him. Their clubhouse wasn't in disarray. Why would him going to another team destroy them?Originally Posted by CatKnight
Why? Wouldn't the same concerns you have now have been present then?I don't buy the case for collusion. Collusion would have been the Giants releasing him on August 1, 2007 and THEN no one signing him.
Sexton isn't trouble? are you kidding me....He threw a darn helmet at one of the Ranger pitchers....poor Gabbard...he's still on the DL...and what's sexton's reward? he gets to join the evil empire....grr...
![]()
I agree with what CatKnight said. It's not so much a concern of Bonds himself causing problems in the locker room, it's the massive media circus that will immediately descend on any team that signs him causing problems. Not even so much the 'How could you guys SIGN such a guy?", but just the everyday crush of reporters that will immediately engulf that franchise. Would YOU want to bring that down on your team, if you're a GM? Sure, you're adding on field talent, but you're also guaranteeing that your players will be driven insane by a ridiculous amount of media attention.
Exactly. It's not "clubhouse cancer" or any real noticeable performance effects, but rather the publicity problems that are probably the main concern. Not even Billy Beane is biting...
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
Like it or not, owners and front office types are selling a product in the end. Obviously winning is (or should be!) priority 1. But making sure it's a good "product" is definitely priority 1a (or 1b to winning's 1a??).
Isn't that the same reason Roger Clemens is out of baseball? I'm sure the Astros would prefer him to some of the scrubs they've had start games this season.
Oh yeah, back to the point of the article.
This is a good deal for both parties. Sexson gets a chance to start fresh somewhere, where he's wanted. And he doesn't care if it's the prorated minimum. He's still getting the 14+ million owed him this season from Seattle. Why not sign somewhere he'll play semi-regularly and have a chance at the postseason?
And for the Yankees? They're having all kinds of injury and roster problems so why not take a cheap chance on a righty with power.
Win-win for both sides, in my mind.
Anyone else notice that the Yankees now have both Mariners first basemen from 2007? (Ben Broussard in AAA and now Sexson)