Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 39

Thread: SM's mid-season predictions

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    7,283

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Ok, cool. Sorry, didn't mean to be rude...at least, not too rude...just trying to give the guys on here a laugh.

    Quote Originally Posted by gleklufdshlaw View Post
    Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    I didn't mean to come off like a jerk either, well mostly.

    I kid though.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    443

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by Alloutwar View Post
    <sarcasm>
    So true! The yankees have it all wrapped up! You guys are SOO STUPID for thinking otherwise! We have A-Rod and RoCa and MelCab, and despite our aging, HGH-loving roster that makes an average of 74 quadrillion dollars per at-bat, we are the BESTEST!

    And we're TOTALLY getting CC at the trade deadline. From worst to first, every year! That's us! The fighting Yanks! We just have horrible aprils to give you guys a HEAD START! HAH!

    As koolzach astutely observes, the Yankees are over .500 in their last 37 games, AND in their last 27! That's unstoppable!!
    </sarcasm>
    Actually, it's over .600. But hey, why be accurate?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    443

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by Alloutwar View Post
    Ok, cool. Sorry, didn't mean to be rude...at least, not too rude...just trying to give the guys on here a laugh.
    It's not working. I also predict it won't work in the future.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    443

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by Alloutwar View Post
    I think you meant to say "past few years"?

    But all grammatical errors aside, I was born about 45 minutes north of Boston, and lived in Massachusetts till I bought my first hour in Florida at 24. I went to my first Sox game at age 8. Mike Greenwell and Ellis Burks were my favorite players.

    Don't assume that everyone that likes a winning team is a bandwagoner...after all, don't you state that your Yankees are 'the winningest franchise ever' and 'do what it takes to win at all costs'? Which, I'd assume, would generate much more fandom than us lowly underdog Sox, with just a paltry 2 championships in the last 89 years.
    How much did you pay for the hour? I wouldn't pay over 60 minutes.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    443

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    I hope the predictions are wrong, and I have a sneaking suspicion they are.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Oh they're very wrong. Pirates all the way!

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    7,283

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by belial View Post
    Actually, it's over .600. But hey, why be accurate?
    Darn it! In my effort to sound like a stupid, ignorant fan, I was accurate to less than .1! I'm going to go stab my dog.

    Quote Originally Posted by belial
    It's not working. I also predict it won't work in the future.
    Forgive me for trying to add something to the boards. I will just post useless, negative, critical one-liner comments about everyone else's posts from now on. What's that you say? That position is taken?? Aww shucks!

    Didn't someone post about my post making them laugh? Nah, must be my imagination. Let's keep pretending your opinion matters!

    Quote Originally Posted by belial
    How much did you pay for the hour? I wouldn't pay over 60 minutes.
    I got a steal at 63 minutes, but with a 4.3% APR over the next 7 miles!

    Quote Originally Posted by gleklufdshlaw View Post
    Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers...

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    4,624

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Red Sox have the best chance of winning the world series according to that . Who said baseball mogul isn't realistic

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    932

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Sox Fan 734 View Post
    Red Sox have the best chance of winning the world series according to that . Who said baseball mogul isn't realistic
    I'd say that the Angels are a better team than the Sawx, though. I'd also say that the Cubs are right there. The Yankees need to make one more move and add a good (but not great) SP to the staff; Rich Harden, Erik Bedard, or Aaron Harang anyone?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    The Angels are not better than the Red Sox.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    932

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    The Angels are not better than the Red Sox.
    Their pitching is much better than the Red Sox. And good pitching beats good hitting in the playoffs.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Edison, NJ
    Posts
    15,636

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    I watch 99% of the Angels' games, and their not better then the Sox (unfortunately). It's definitely arguable that Scioscia is a better manager than Francona though.
    You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by koolzach1 View Post
    I'd say that the Angels are a better team than the Sawx, though. I'd also say that the Cubs are right there. The Yankees need to make one more move and add a good (but not great) SP to the staff; Rich Harden, Erik Bedard, or Aaron Harang anyone?
    I'd be delighted to see Rich Harden join the Yankees DL squad.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: SM's mid-season predictions

    Quote Originally Posted by koolzach1 View Post
    Their pitching is much better than the Red Sox. And good pitching beats good hitting in the playoffs.
    Angels ERA - 3.79, 7th in MLB
    Red Sox ERA - 3.87, 8th in MLB

    Marginally better in ERA, and thats with Beckett starting out slow and Matsuzaka missing about a month after starting out the season red hot. Basically a wash here though

    Angels BAA - .255, 11th in MLB
    Red Sox BAA - .244, 4th in MLB

    Red Sox are marginally better here, but its basically a wash, as with ERA.

    Angels # of QS - 49, 2nd in MLB
    Red Sox # of QS - 45, 7th in MLB

    Angels have a few more QS, but again basically a wash.

    Angels Opposing OPS - .710, 8th in MLB
    Red Sox Opposing OPS - .702, 7th in MLB

    Again a wash.

    By now you should see the point I'm trying to convey. The Angels pitching may be ever so slightly better than the Red Sox, but its basically a wash and unnoticeable. Both teams have had a few injuries to their staff as well.

    Now, lets look at the offense.

    Red Sox Runs - 428, 3rd in MLB
    Angels Runs - 341, 24th in MLB

    A pretty large disparity.

    Red Sox BA - .280, 2nd in MLB
    Angels BA - .255, 22nd in MLB

    Again, a huge disparity.

    Red Sox OBP - .354, 2nd in MLB
    Angels OBP - .315, 28th in MLB (Ahead of only Washington and Seattle)

    The pitching is so close between the Angels and Red Sox that any series between them would come down to the hitting, where the Red Sox are CLEARLY a far superior team. The Red Sox are pretty obviously the class of baseball right now and the only teams that can compete with them are the Cubs and Rays.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •