Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 182

Thread: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by gRYFYN1 View Post
    This is insane! really he's afaraid of his guys having to run, what a *****. I want to enact a rule that we can have Ellsbury run for Ortiz from now on, I mean we dont pay Ortiz to run the bases hes paid to hit the ball.
    I'm replying before i read the entire thread...but I can do that

    If pitchers should have to run & bat, than hitters should have to throw 95MPH consistently and nibble corners while perfecting late breaking pitches that make hitters swing & miss.

    Not realistic eh?? Of course not. This is a multi-billion dollar sport now, and pitchers are specialists. They are paid millions of dollars to be so. Sure running the bases and batting doesn't SEEM like much but it is not something they should do at all!! There is no need for it. They are paid to pitch and to perfect their pitching ability, and paid in high order. That specialty should be protected.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CT, USA, Earth
    Posts
    1,806

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    The Constitution was designed by the founders to save people from themselves. It never fails to amaze me how good of a job they did
    haveacigar
    My Finest work!!!
    Death don't want ya... But the Lotus do... so bring ya wicked shlt we gonna bring ours too!!!
    ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>
    ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>


  3. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by RickD View Post
    Can and should are two different things....Pitchers can run and cover first base, pitchers should NOT run around the bases and hit balls....they should pitch NOT hit.

    Go Yankees!
    Agree 100%...except for the go yankees part.

    I'm a die hard sox fan...but earily suspect that if this was Beckett who was out for the year the sawx hipocrite fan base in here would have a different opinion.

    Traditionalists crack me up. We can spend all day talking about different eras and changes to the game that makes 'tradition' an obsolete argument. Heck, when baseball begun they didn't have 9 innings, they played as long as it took for one team to score 22 runs! Times have changed quite a bit.

    Back in the day, sure it made sense. The game has modernized, pitchers are much more valuable and perfect the 'art' and should be protected from meaningless at bats and base running. Fans should be able to see the stars doing what they do best, not sitting at home on the DL or worse, swinging a bat when they have no right doing so.

    Yeah I know NL pitchers run the bases all the time, but fact is they get hurt doing it as well. Its not made to be a big deal because it's something they do. The AL doesn't have that situation, so this is highlighted because of it.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    820

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    If pitchers should have to run & bat, than hitters should have to throw 95MPH consistently and nibble corners while perfecting late breaking pitches that make hitters swing & miss.
    Exactly! Not only that, but the defensive team in baseball should work like volleyball. With every at bat, the players should rotate positions. There's no reason why only a few guys should have to pitch, a few have to catch, etc. All of this modern day "specialization" stuff is ridiculous.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    7,283

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    Fans should be able to see the stars doing what they do best
    Then why are fans treated to Adam Dunn in Left Field? Or Bonds for that matter? There are some pitchers who hit well - Zambrano, Willis, Micah Owings - we shouldn't eliminate the pitcher hitting part of the game just because of some 1-dimensional players.

    Personally, I like seeing Wake or Dice-K at the plate. Beckett did hit in the NL for years, and he did fine. And if you missed my post, Colon just got injured swinging a bat (seriously?). So it can and has affected the Sox team as well (granted, our #5 starter, and a much shorter time period, but ah well).

    I think the flaw here is that somewhere along the line all the minor league teams went DH only, as well...so pitchers like Wang don't hit, at all, from high school until midway thru an MLB season 6-8 years later, for 10 at bats. If it was something they at least had foundations in, this might not be such a serious problem.

    But that's all beside the point - this wasn't even HITTING! This was RUNNING! What kind of professional athlete can't make it 90 feet?? This sort of thing has to be chalked up to unfortunate happenstance - it could've happened with him fielding the ball or getting to first. Heck, this could just be fallout from the way the weight falls on his leg with every pitch. To take one injury and blow it into NL-is-evil-for-making-pitchers-hit is a tad over the top.

    Quote Originally Posted by gleklufdshlaw View Post
    Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers...

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,198

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by Alloutwar View Post
    Then why are fans treated to Adam Dunn in Left Field? Or Bonds for that matter? There are some pitchers who hit well - Zambrano, Willis, Micah Owings - we shouldn't eliminate the pitcher hitting part of the game just because of some 1-dimensional players.

    Personally, I like seeing Wake or Dice-K at the plate. Beckett did hit in the NL for years, and he did fine. And if you missed my post, Colon just got injured swinging a bat (seriously?). So it can and has affected the Sox team as well (granted, our #5 starter, and a much shorter time period, but ah well).

    I think the flaw here is that somewhere along the line all the minor league teams went DH only, as well...so pitchers like Wang don't hit, at all, from high school until midway thru an MLB season 6-8 years later, for 10 at bats. If it was something they at least had foundations in, this might not be such a serious problem.

    But that's all beside the point - this wasn't even HITTING! This was RUNNING! What kind of professional athlete can't make it 90 feet?? This sort of thing has to be chalked up to unfortunate happenstance - it could've happened with him fielding the ball or getting to first. Heck, this could just be fallout from the way the weight falls on his leg with every pitch. To take one injury and blow it into NL-is-evil-for-making-pitchers-hit is a tad over the top.
    The point isn't that he should be able to run it is that he shouldn't HAVE to run. There's no benefit. As for Zambrano, Owings, or whatever pitcher you want to say swings a good bat, any sane person will agree that IF IT WERE POSSIBLE PER THE RULES the team would take that pitcher out of the lineup in lieu of a DH, solely to protect him from injury. The offense, plus or minus, is a moot point. No rule in the AL says a team CANNOT ALLOW a pitcher to hit or run the bases....they just did what any sane team would, protect their investment. You wouldn't put a classic show car in a nascar race, or a short sprinter in a marathon and visa versa. These guys are bred to be perfectionists at pitching. Thats what they are paid to do, and thats what we the fans pay to see. Keep them healthy.

    You hit it on the head when you said Colon for a short period is not of equal discussion as Wang through Sept. Nuff said.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    No. Va., Loudoun County
    Posts
    2,620

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Pitcher's protected? Well, there are some mighty fine shortstops in several layers of the minors that can play the position with the best of them, but can't hit a lick. Maybe we should have a DH for them too?

    There you go. I can see it now. Baseball like football. The best 8 defensive guys play the field, and the best 9 offensive guys hit. Rosters expand to 40 year round, the player's association loves it (more MLB jobs), and pretty soon the specialist idea can be taken to the extreme and even those great hitters can have designated runners because they're too slow. Now rosters are 50, the MLBPA loves it.

    But one thing it ain't, it ain't baseball. Baseball always was my nine guys against your nine guys. Period. You don't like the way pitchers hit?? Fine, there's no rule against having Albert Pujols pitch. There's no rule against having Barry Bonds pitch. That's just it. You pick the nine guys on your team, and you can play them anywhere you want. I pick my nine and play them where I want. You can pick a great pitcher who can't hit just like you could pitch shortstop who can't hit. But to then want to change the game from what it's always been??? Like I said, take this specialization to the extreme and it may be efficient, it may even be popular, but it ain't baseball.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    /ˈskædʒɨt/
    Posts
    4,469

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by Alloutwar View Post
    I think the flaw here is that somewhere along the line all the minor league teams went DH only, as well...so pitchers like Wang don't hit, at all, from high school until midway thru an MLB season 6-8 years later, for 10 at bats. If it was something they at least had foundations in, this might not be such a serious problem.
    The part in bold is incorrect. In AAA/AA, when a NL minor league team plays another NL minor league team, there is no DH. Example.
    Somewhere I posted the rules for DH use in the minor leagues, but not sure where at this moment, but if I recall correctly, the home team has the option to not have the DH in the game, they just don't use it (similar to A ball and below)

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    805

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by Überpöster View Post
    and for all of your that say its dumb pitcher hit... i guess babe ruth would have stayed a pitcher since he never would have come to bat and seen what he could do!!!
    That would have been a shame. That could have meant a championship or two?(not really sure) less for the poor NY Wangkees.

    And OldFatGuy summed it up best.

    Btw Matt Cain's two homers this year were far more entertaining to me than any washed up, roided up DH's entire season of homers. So I'll pay to see a pitcher hit any day.

    Speaking of homers, lol at all the poor whining Wangkee fans. Get over yourselves.
    Last edited by rogue9; 06-18-2008 at 12:36 AM. Reason: spelling

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    What's with all the talk about DH's being roid-monsters?

    Of all the player's caught for steroids, I think none of them were regular DH's.



    Quote Originally Posted by OldFatGuy
    But to then want to change the game from what it's always been???
    The game has changed many times from "what it's always been." Look at 19th century baseball and it's nothing at all like modern-day baseball, or pre-DH baseball in the middle of the 20th century.

    Quote Originally Posted by OldFatGuy
    Like I said, take this specialization to the extreme and it may be efficient, it may even be popular, but it ain't baseball.
    Thankfully, nobody wants to take it to the extreme.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    805

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    probably, but thats just my opinion, and I mean it as nothing more.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by rogue9 View Post
    probably, but thats just my opinion, and I mean it as nothing more.
    It's your opinion that designated hitters all use steroids, or at least use it a lot more than other players?

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    805

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    no, not all. Its my suspicion that alot of the older DH's that are just rediculously bulked have probably done peds at some point or another.

    Giambi comes to mind, of course he has admitted it (I think?).

    Anyways, that wasn't really my point in saying that. I was trying to say that I get more entertainment seeing someone like Matt Cain get two dingers than see some washed up, bulked up guy who can't field hit 50 HRs.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by rogue9 View Post
    no, not all. Its my suspicion that alot of the older DH's that are just rediculously bulked have probably done peds at some point or another.
    Maybe. But a lot of the older players, DH or not, that played in the 90's probably did PEDs at some point.

    Giambi comes to mind, of course he has admitted it (I think?).
    He basically has.

    Anyways, that wasn't really my point in saying that. I was trying to say that I get more entertainment seeing someone like Matt Cain get two dingers than see some washed up, bulked up guy who can't field hit 50 HRs.
    Fair.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    805

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Maybe. But a lot of the older players, DH or not, that played in the 90's probably did PEDs at some point.

    Granted, but if they hadn't taken peds, there is a decent chance they would not be playing today. Which is basically why I threw the roided up comment in there.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •