Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 182

Thread: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Forum
    Posts
    823

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by RickD View Post
    Hey good idea.....
    lol
    "The secret of success in life is for a man to be ready for opportunity when it comes."
    Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881) British prime minister and novelist

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peterborough Ontario
    Posts
    256

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Well, it seems Hank Steinbrenner needs a history lesson.. The comment by Mussina was funny too, just the fact that they're getting a pitcher who's never pitched in the National League, unlike say.. Andy Pettitte.. to complain about having to run..

    If you're able to run to first to cover the base, you can run around the bases..
    ------
    Well, this year should be interesting..

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Can and should are two different things....Pitchers can run and cover first base, pitchers should NOT run around the bases and hit balls....they should pitch NOT hit.

    Go Yankees!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Republic of Georgia
    Posts
    12,385

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by RickD View Post
    Can and should are two different things....Pitchers can run and cover first base, pitchers should NOT run around the bases and hit balls....they should pitch NOT hit.

    Go Yankees!
    And whyfor should they NOT hit?

    It very clearly states in the rulebook that a team is composed of nine players. Not nine players and a designated hitter, which makes 10.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Republic of Georgia
    Posts
    12,385

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by RickD View Post
    Can and should are two different things....Pitchers can run and cover first base, pitchers should NOT run around the bases and hit balls....they should pitch NOT hit.

    Go Yankees!
    And...

    A grown man SHOULD be able to run 90 feet without injuring himself.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by filihok View Post
    And whyfor should they NOT hit?
    Hello...it's the NY Yankees.....they don't play by everyone else's rules.

    As an irrational fan I think they (the pitchers) should NOT be hitting but stick to pitching. Let the common teams use their pitchers for imitation batters but NOT the Yankees!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    I love how all the Yankee fans are whining. Whimper. Sniffle. We can't afford our stadium, and now they want our pitchers to run!? Poor oppressed Yankees.

    Maybe it's time for HANK to grow up. And some others, perhaps.

    Wang SHOULD be in excellent shape. If he can't run 90 feet, then there is a BIG problem. If he can't turn corners, then how can he maneuver to catch a ball?

    If the Yankees aren't preparing their pitchers for the possibility that one day, yes, they might actually have a job to do besides throw a ball 100.000 times per game, then maybe HANK should talk to his TRAINERS.

    I agree the disparity between the leagues should be dealt with. Obviously the NL pitchers are in better shape than their AL counterparts, therefore the solution is simple.

    Get rid of the DH.

    Poor Yankee babies. Once Hank is done sucking on his golden pacifier, let me know and maybe we can play a game he can WIN.
    Retired Dynasties I'm Proud of
    To Rule in Kansas City Part I and Part II (Kansas City Royals 1969-73, Hall of Fame)
    Cardinal Sins (St. Louis Cardinals 1976-78) and it's sequel:
    Diverting Destiny (Montreal Expos 1994)
    Script for my Requiem (New Orleans Blues (fictional) 1954)

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen


  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Forum
    Posts
    823

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by filihok View Post
    And whyfor should they NOT hit?

    It very clearly states in the rulebook that a team is composed of nine players. Not nine players and a designated hitter, which makes 10.
    bingo
    Quote Originally Posted by filihok View Post
    And...

    A grown man SHOULD be able to run 90 feet without injuring himself.


    Quote Originally Posted by RickD View Post
    Can and should are two different things....Pitchers can run and cover first base, pitchers should NOT run around the bases and hit balls....they should pitch NOT hit.

    Go Yankees!
    and for all of your that say its dumb pitcher hit... i guess babe ruth would have stayed a pitcher since he never would have come to bat and seen what he could do!!!
    "The secret of success in life is for a man to be ready for opportunity when it comes."
    Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881) British prime minister and novelist

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    932

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by Arctic Blast View Post
    demand that every ballpark in the majors cushion the basepaths with soft foam when the Yankees come to town?
    That truly is a brilliant idea, AB. If anyone deserves extra precautions - it's the New York Yankees; the greatest sports franchise in history.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    932

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by CatKnight View Post
    I love how all the Yankee fans are whining. Whimper. Sniffle. We can't afford our stadium, and now they want our pitchers to run!? Poor oppressed Yankees.

    Maybe it's time for HANK to grow up. And some others, perhaps.

    Wang SHOULD be in excellent shape. If he can't run 90 feet, then there is a BIG problem. If he can't turn corners, then how can he maneuver to catch a ball?

    If the Yankees aren't preparing their pitchers for the possibility that one day, yes, they might actually have a job to do besides throw a ball 100.000 times per game, then maybe HANK should talk to his TRAINERS.

    I agree the disparity between the leagues should be dealt with. Obviously the NL pitchers are in better shape than their AL counterparts, therefore the solution is simple.

    Get rid of the DH.

    Poor Yankee babies. Once Hank is done sucking on his golden pacifier, let me know and maybe we can play a game he can WIN.
    Wow... such hate for the greatest sports franchise in history.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    7,283

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    Babe Ruth would totally agree. I mean, a guy that pitched AND hit?? Thank goodness he never made it anywhere. Much less revered as a true great of the sport! Hah, silly guy.

    A clown like that would never have played for the Yankees, who have used the DH since it's inception in 203 BC.

    Quote Originally Posted by gleklufdshlaw View Post
    Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers...

  13. #43
    MeetDaMets Guest

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    So far this year , the DH is having its worst collective BA since inception.
    (heard on a telecast )

    Guess those shoulda been washed up already but im on steroids guys are having some probs.

    DH was installed during a low period in baseball attendance.
    It was intended to generate more offense as a marketing ploy.

    National League attendance seems ok to me.
    It was NOT intended to "protect the pitcher".
    although that is a side benefit , i guess...

    If they can run in the WS they can run in an interleague game in a national league park.

    besides its a freakin abomination.

    oh and the yankees have won far more WS with Pitcher batting the with the DH .
    id bet the per year rate of winning the WS is higher with pitcher batting too.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Forum
    Posts
    823

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    tho lol
    if the yanks had the dh back then
    he would have pitched every 3rd day (as they did) and DH on his days off. 400+ wins with 800 HR lol
    "The secret of success in life is for a man to be ready for opportunity when it comes."
    Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881) British prime minister and novelist

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    7,283

    Re: Hank Steinbrenner is the biggest...uh...kitty...I've ever seen

    UPDATE: The Red Sox have now lost Bartolo Colon, due to an injury sustained while swinging a bat in yesterday's game...something he has rarely had to do as a pitcher!

    I dunno about you guys, but I am pretty sure Theo Epstein or Larry Lucchino will have a press conference soon, denouncing the NL rules as a useless throwback, and blaming MLB and the NL for this injury. Right? Right? I'm sure it will happen....aaaany minute now...

    Or, maybe we'll just deal with it, and call up some other talented starter, since the Sox have the depth to deal with issues like this, the foresight to develop and safeguard their prospects, and generally behave like something more mature than a rejected 13-year old?

    Quote Originally Posted by gleklufdshlaw View Post
    Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •