Maybe not entirely.Originally Posted by belial
However, it IS true that in every group of people, there are jerks. And sometimes, those jerks are louder and more noticeable than the non-jerks, even if the jerks are the minority.
o
Maybe not entirely.
However, it IS true that in every group of people, there are jerks. And sometimes, those jerks are louder and more noticeable than the non-jerks, even if the jerks are the minority.
Banned
Well yea
Valentine Lake Horror
Ever notice that, those who constantly refer to others as jerks, are quite often considered to be jerks themselves?
Banned
No but I noticed one too many commas.
Valentine Lake Horror
Really? And now YOU are going to correct spelling, grammar and punctuation? You REALLY want to go there, Hater?
Banned
I noticed one too few in that one.
o
Valentine Lake Horror
Can opened, worms everywhere, Hater. Big mistake, based on what I've seen from you.
Banned
Well - you were the one that took 'jerk' to the personal level. I just spoke in general terms. You made an implication that I was a jerk. But right, I'm the bad guy. Don't worry, you'll get HGM's me-toos to agree with you.
o
I don't think he was calling you a jerk. He was saying that some consider you a jerk.
Valentine Lake Horror
Actually, you made it quite clear that you consider all Boston fans to be jerks. I have made it quite clear that I am a Boston fan. How is that not personal? You must be joking.
Banned
I, uh what? I said generally Boston fans are whiners (which they are), spoiled brats (most New Englanders are), and few other things. I don't ever recall saying 'all', and if I did then I have no friggen clue why I did that.
o
You didn't say "all" but it was pretty much implied.
Banned
No way should anything anybody says about a large group of people ever be taken as a blanket statement.
Banned
It wasn't. Who the **** would make a blanket statement about a group of people that large?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote