3 games...
and prior to last year he was OK at best and inconsistent/awful at worse.Prior to last year, he had 4 average years (2001, 2002, 2004, 2005), a solid year (2003), and a great year (2006). In other words, a very valuable pitcher, and is just now hitting the usual peak years.
Right, like I said. He's not a good risk for a long-term deal.Plus he's known to pack on a pound or two.....I know darn well he's approaching an age where that catches up with you.
Cut it out with the snarky "stat" nonsense. Read my last statement:I'm on the record......he will be a major bust during his next contract. God forbid he stay healthy this year because someone (probably the yanks) will pay 20 mil or so for the next 6 years plus and be burned big time. So stat god.......
I wouldn't give 6-7 years to him, as he's a hefty dude, so there's an inherent health risk in that, I think, but Sabathia is FAR FAR FAR from Barry Zito, whose stats had been declining for a few years before he hit free agency.No, I'm not willing to go on the record against that, AS I SAID, because I don't really disagree. He's a huge risk for a longterm contract due to his weight. I just am saying that he's far from where Barry Zito was. Zito had already obviously begun declining when he was given a gigantic contract. Sabathia hasn't, and if anything, has only been getting better. HOWEVER, I agree with you that a 6+ year contract for a player like him would likely turn out badly. I wouldn't go over 4 years with him.you willing to go on record against that?? If not, then why argue.....because those who watch the game and watch Sabathia want no part of his next contract. He may be a servicable pitcher for a bit, but clearly nowheres near the ace money he'll be demanding.
!
You know, this bickering between Yankees and Red Sox fans over who has the better young pitchers is really getting on my nerves. Clay Buchholz has huge potential. So does Phil Hughes. Neither has done that well in the majors. They're also both very young. The HUGE majority of "top" pitching prospects don't make it. The odds are heavily against ALL pitching prospects. It's completely silly to argue over which Red Sox and Yankees pitchers have been busts after like barely 100 innings in the bigs for each pitcher, when each pitcher is still in their early 20's. As of right now, NONE of them are busts. It's far too early to say anything.Originally Posted by koolzach1





Prior to last year, he had 4 average years (2001, 2002, 2004, 2005), a solid year (2003), and a great year (2006). In other words, a very valuable pitcher, and is just now hitting the usual peak years.
Reply With Quote
