Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 89

Thread: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    5,223

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    How is Jeter a sure Hall of Famer?


    I HATE when people automatically assume a player is great because he has one (or more) World Series rings.

    Bobby Kielty has a World Series ring (he won one last year), but that does not make him a great player. If he stays with the Sox for the next four years, solely off of the bench with a start or two here and there, and the Sox win each of the next 4 years (giving him 5 rings), would that make him a great, surefire HOF'er?
    I always think of Tito Landrum when you think of guys with rings that will never sniff the HOF, I think Landrumon 2...
    Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are .

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    And those reasons are???
    Very good production from a key defensive position for what will likely be about 15 seasons, with solid production for 2-4 more seasons.

    All-star games? Arrogant Yankee fans vote him in every year undeservingly.
    Let's see. All Star games are a horrible judge of a player, and they're only based on half a season, but let's look at each year in which Jeter made the all-star team, and see how he faired amongst his league's shortstops:

    1998: Nomar Garciaparra and Alex Rodriguez were both better than him. A-Rod was an All-Star, Garciaparra wasn't.
    1999: Him and Garciaparra were both roughly equal. Both were All-Stars.
    2000: A-Rod and Garciaparra were better. All 3 were All-Stars.
    2001: A-Rod was better, and was an All-Star.
    2002: A-Rod, Garciaparra, and Tejada were all better. All of them, AND Jeter were All-Stars. Also, Jeter's second half was significantly worse than his first half, so even though his overall numbers don't look like anything special, they were certainly All-Star worthy at the half.
    2004: Carlos Guillen was better. Both were all-stars.
    2006: Carlos Guillen was arguably better, but did his best work in the second half.
    2007: Carlos Guillen was arguably better. Both made the All-Star team.

    So, considering, every single year Jeter was one of the top 3 shortstops in his league (except for 2002 where he was 4th), and every year, he AND the better guys all made the All-Star team (except Nomar in 1998), I'd say he is surely deserving of his All-Star appearances.

    MVP Awards? Wait, he has none...
    He arguably should have won in 2006. MVP awards are also a poor judge of a player.

    I consider him the type of player that I hate most- which I call the "sampler".

    Other "samplers" include, IMO, Curtis Granderson and Jimmy Rollins.

    Samplers are players who aren't very good in any one area, but are OK in many areas. Being a sampler (as Jeter is), IMO, does not warrant HOF induction.
    Jeter is VERY GOOD AT HITTING. You obviously aren't taking position into account. For a shortstop, there aren't many players that can match his production.

    Of players that played more than half their games at shortstop, all-time, Derek Jeter ranks 5th in OPS+ (tied with Ernie Banks, if you lower the playing time threshold just a bit) - Honus Wagner, Alex Rodriguez, Arky Vaughan, and Nomar Garciaparra are ahead of him. By the time his career is over, A-Rod likely won't qualify for that, and Garciaparra will likely be behind him.

    Look, I think Jeter is overrated, especially on his defense. He's a bad defender. He isn't the second coming of Jesus. Yankee fans think he's way better than he is. But saying he's not a great player and not a surefire Hall of Famer is just as bad as the exaggeration of his ability from Yankee fans.

    As dickay said, he's very likely going to reach 3,000 hits, which, like it or not, makes him a surefire Hall of Famer. He's a deserving Hall of Famer if he retires today, and he's still got at least 5 more years left.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    I went to the HOF website and compared Jeter's current numbers with the career numbers of various shortstops in the HOF....based on those numbers he qualifies now for the HOF!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    151

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Not a fan of Jeter...but compare his numbers to that of Pete Rose. In 2007, Derek Jeter turned 33 years old. In 1974, Pete Rose turned 33.
    Their numbers through those two seasons.

    Jeter-1835 games; 7429 at-bats; 1379 runs; 2356 hits; 195 HR; 933 RBI; 264 SB; 761 BB; 1291 K; .317 BA; .388 OBP; .462 SLG
    Rose-1860 games; 7559 at-bats; 1217 runs; 2337 hits; 117 HR; 701 RBI; 97 SB; 782 BB; 723 K; .309 BA; .376 OBP; .432 SLG

    I'd say those two are fairly similar lines, and other than the big difference in strikeouts, I beleive Jeter has performed at a higher offensive level than Pete Rose.

    I don't think Jeter will play until he's 152 years of age like Rose, so he probably won't break the hits record, but he could reach 3500 hits (only five people have done that) and score 2000 runs (only seven have done that).

    Toss in his championships, which fair or not do play a part in HoF voting and that he is not only one of the most recognizable names and faces in all of baseball, he's one of the most recognizable names and faces in all of American sports.

    I think a more reasonable question may end up being, Can he receive the highest percentage of votes for the Hall of Fame?

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    YES!!!!!! (According to biased Yankees fans like me!)

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Exciting Leduc, Alberta!
    Posts
    6,195

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Gotta love a guy saying Jeter isn't a Hall of Famer, then following that up with a list putting Hideo Nomo (only way this guy makes it is if we're including Japanese League stats, and I don't see Sadaharu Oh getting in any time soon!), Felix Hernandez (how can anyone make ANY predictions on this guy when he's still figuring things out at the major league level???) and Dustin Pedroia and Troy Tulowitzki (Yes, let's just make massive projections for guys with ONE YEAR IN THE BIGS).

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Jeter!!Jeter!!Jeter!!

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    932

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsoxRockies View Post
    I agree with Mets, Jeter has never been amazing, just ok. He benefits from playing in new york and on good teams. If he was on, say Tampa Bay, He would not stand a chance. I think a player who does is Troy Tulowitzki. Though young, he combines outstanding and likely to get better offence with gold glove caliber defence. Not to mention he also has gotten off to a young start, and should play for years to come. I think out of all active players, these stand out as the ones most likely to make the hall(in majors). Chipper Jones, Andruw Jones, John Smoltz, Tom Glavine, Randy Johnson, Johan Santana, Jose Reyes, David Wright, Ryan Braun, Prince Fielder, Ben Sheets(if he can stay healthy), Ken Griffey, Grady Sizemore, CC Sabathia, Roy halladay, Dustin Pedroia, Manny Ramirez, Troy Tulo, Matt Holliday, Todd Helton, Felik Hernandez, Ichiro, Hideo Nomo(only as a pioneer, even though early on he was good) and so on.....
    WOW! This has got to be the most ridiculous thing ever posted! At first I stopped reading when I first saw that Jeter has never been amazing. I figured, that I'd start reading again... bad idea. I then saw that Troy Tolowitzki has a shot at the HOF. He is very overrated, except for defense. His offense is helped a LOT by Coors, as he hits .250 away from Coors, and .317 at Coors. Chipper may get in the HOF, Andruw Jones hasn't a chance, imo. Smoltz, Glavine, Johnson all will get in. Santana, may have a shot if he continues to be as good as he has in his career. Reyes is very overrated; A decent defensive SS, that is a decent hitter with god like speed. Wright may have a chance if he continues what he has done, same goes for Fielder. Sheets? Sheets? Sheet? Seriously? He hasn't a shot at his pace. Griffey is a sure HOF'er. Sizemore? Not at how he has preformed this far. Sabathia, only if he can sustain his recent success. Don't see Halladay getting in. Pedroia??? Lol, all he can do is field well, and hit for average. Manny may have a shot if he can have a couple more good years. Holliday? If he can continue his success of last year. Helton probably won't be getting in, but could have a shot. Felix Hernandez? He is currently very inconsistent, so if he can turn it around, maybe. Ichiro will get in. Nomo? Heck nah! Most of these guys are very young, so I wouldn't make assumptions yet... Also, no Yankees? If you have Pedroia up there, you must have his superior in Cano. Where is A-Rod? Jeter... already been discussed, but will be a HOF'er. Godzilla should be in there if you are going to throw in Nomo (though Matsui doesn't belong, but Nomo definitely doesn't). Where is Mo Rivera? Lol, this is just a homer list here. I don't know if you're seriously, or just playing around, but I hope the latter.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    805

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Quote Originally Posted by dickay View Post
    Of course they had the Eck ending the games, the second best closer of alltime (next to Mariano of course) and arguable the most intimidating.
    Maybe I am missing something, but I fail to see how Mariano is the best all time closer. Or even the best current.

    The only stat I see that he beats Hoffman in is ERA, but they are both under 3. Hoffman has a better op. batting average, and far more saves. Mariano hasn't saved 40+ games in 2 years, Hoffman has saved 40+ for the last 4.

    For that matter, Billy Wagner has an ERA much closer to Mariano's, and a better op. BA. Granted not as many saves though. Both Wagner and Hoffman posted better ERAs last year than Mariano.

    I am not taking into account post season success, I am looking at their numbers playing the same role on their respective teams. I just don't get it, there are 2 other guys that are long time closers that have numbers close to, or arguably better than Mariano's, yet everyone touts him as the best all time. I do not subscribe to the school of thought that says being on a yankee team makes you best at your position, maybe thats what I am missing.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    My list is not complete because I had to go and I did not feel like adding hundreds of others who may stand a chance. These are not definates, just players who if play as expected may make it in and players who everyone knows will make it in. As for Nomo, though not the first Japanese player, he is a pioneer that led to teams signing more and more asians. Look at Jackie Robinson. Though he was a great player, he did not put up hall of fame #'s, but got voted in because of his role as a pioneer. The same can be said for monte irvin and Larry doby. So while based on numbers, Nomo does not stand a chance, he is a pioneer. As for Troy Tulo, He is NOT overrrated. He is young and, as long as he stays healthy should play untill he is around 39-40. If he plays at least at his level in 2007 he will have a good chance, let alone the fact that he is young and likely will get better. Like I said I did not finish the list, nor even come close. A0Rod will make it in if he retires now, Hoffman and Rivera are going in, if Cano stays strong he will definately be considered. I included so many young players because I think they will develop into potential hall of famers if all goes good. I think Andruw Jones will make it only because he styarted young and should, if he can return to previous strength, will likely hit 500 homers. Others I did not add that I think will make it in or may have a chance later on are: Omar Vizquel, Kenny Lofton, Curt Schilling, Frank Thomas, jim Thome, Papelbon if he stays a closer for 15-20 years and stays this good, Maddux of course, Miguel Cabrera, Jake Peavy and so on,(there is plenty more so dont attack me for leaving them off.) As for Sheets, only if he can stay healthy and pitch his best for a while. I like the stuff he has. Sabatia, now that I think about, he will not get in unles he repeats. Beckett may though. And Sizemore, in case you have not noticed kool, but he is predicted by many to become a 30homer, 30steal, high average knid of guy. If he becomes as good as they're saying, he is gunna be in. And Arctic, Felix started young and could become amazing. I am not saying these guys will make it in, but potentially they coul.


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    I dunno who I hate more:

    People who say Derek Jeter is a Hall of Famer or

    People who say Mariano Rivera is a hall of famer

    Both in no way deserve HOF induction (unless being arrogant jerks who win all the time makes you more qualified for the HOF), but both have a 99.999% chance of getting in because of sportswriters who have no idea what the helll they are talking about who vote for people with shiny awards and a lot of HRs, wins, or saves(the only stats that 99 percent of sportswriters give a dammn about)and leave off big stars(Someone did vote for Todd Stottlemyre last year).
    ]

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    123

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Quote Originally Posted by rogue9 View Post
    Maybe I am missing something, but I fail to see how Mariano is the best all time closer. Or even the best current.

    The only stat I see that he beats Hoffman in is ERA, but they are both under 3. Hoffman has a better op. batting average, and far more saves. Mariano hasn't saved 40+ games in 2 years, Hoffman has saved 40+ for the last 4.
    That difference is pretty significant, though. Especially when you take into account that Mariano has pitched in a DH league in a park that favors hitters more than Hoffman's park. And not that I condone it, but if we were to throw out Mo's 50 IP as a starter, his ERA would drop even further.

    As for the Opp. BA argument, yes, Hoffman beats Rivera, .209 to .216, but Mariano has a significantly lower Opp. OPS - .565 to Hoffman's .602. You know why that is? Because Hoffman gives up a lot more homers. What's more important for a closer - being able to keep batters from reaching base, or to prevent those that do reach base from scoring? Sure, Mariano gives a up a few more hits here and there, but those runners end up being left on base.

    Quote Originally Posted by rogue9 View Post
    For that matter, Billy Wagner has an ERA much closer to Mariano's, and a better op. BA. Granted not as many saves though. Both Wagner and Hoffman posted better ERAs last year than Mariano.
    Wagner has a solid case for being just as good as the other two, but he doesn't have Hoffman's save numbers or Mariano's mystique, so he doesn't ever really get the credit he deserves.

    Quote Originally Posted by rogue9 View Post
    I am not taking into account post season success, I am looking at their numbers playing the same role on their respective teams. I just don't get it, there are 2 other guys that are long time closers that have numbers close to, or arguably better than Mariano's, yet everyone touts him as the best all time. I do not subscribe to the school of thought that says being on a yankee team makes you best at your position, maybe thats what I am missing.
    And another thing...why aren't you taking into account postseason success? I mean, Mariano's got another 1.5 season's worth of HOF-caliber pitching against the best teams of each season. Now granted, Hoffman hasn't had the type of postseason opportunities that Mariano has, but in his 13 playoff innings he's been solid...not quite impressive.

    And I'm not trying to say that Mariano's absolutely the best that ever was, or even that he's significantly better than either Hoffman or Wagner, but it's harder to make an argument for Hoffman than it is to make one for Mo. A .007 difference in Opp. BA isn't enough. Wagner is closer to being even with Mo, but Rivera's got a 182-inning advantage on Wags, so we'll have to see how the rest of their respective careers go.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    14,017

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Quote Originally Posted by yankee hater View Post
    Jeter's numbers are favorable for being on track for HOF, and Mariano is the best closer ever, so he will be a shoo-in too.
    Are you serious?

    I can name 10 closers better than him:

    1. Lee Smith
    2. Trevor Hoffman
    3. Dennis Eckersley
    4. Goose Gossage
    5.Bruce Sutter
    6.Hoyt Wilhelm (was he a closer or just a relief pitcher?)
    7. Billy Wagner
    8. John Franco
    9. Rollie Fingers
    10. Robb Nen (retired while still in his prime)
    ]

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    123

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Quote Originally Posted by metsguy234 View Post
    I dunno who I hate more:

    People who say Derek Jeter is a Hall of Famer or

    People who say Mariano Rivera is a hall of famer

    Both in no way deserve HOF induction (unless being arrogant jerks who win all the time makes you more qualified for the HOF), but both have a 99.999% chance of getting in because of sportswriters who have no idea what the helll they are talking about who vote for people with shiny awards and a lot of HRs, wins, or saves(the only stats that 99 percent of sportswriters give a dammn about)and leave off big stars(Someone did vote for Todd Stottlemyre last year).
    Just curious, do you think Barry Larkin and Alan Trammell are deserving of the Hall of Fame?

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Good Ol' Massachusetts
    Posts
    8,151

    Re: Baseball's All-Time Greatest Teams

    Yes, Larkin and Trammel are deserving. Both were better than Jeter, along with being better than many other hall of famers, specifically most of the Giants from the 20's in the hall.


    Economic Left/Right: -7.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.72

    (Thanks to BINGLE for my banner!)

    Matt Wieters says:"My morning routine goes: wake up, bang 10 hot women, eat Lucky Charms, destroy a few countries, and then read YeahThisIsMyBlog.blogspot.com."

    Mogul No No's and Perfect Games:

    2008 Royals-Gil Meche No hitter in 10 innings 1-0 final score

    2038 Padres-Matthew Graham Perfect Game 1-0 victory!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •