Page 26 of 38 FirstFirst ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 390 of 557

Thread: To Rule in Kansas City

  1. #376
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,803

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    Very interesting "fan loyalty" results.

    Last year with the ETB dynasty, I had decided to "collapse" fan loyalty. I used the formula:

    new fan loyalty = (old fan loyalty)*(0.9) + 10

    What this did is it transformed fan loyalty from a spectrum of 60 to 100 to a spectrum of 64 to 100. Furthermore, the equation is more likely to bump up a team on the bottom (60 becomes 64) than a team on the top (100 stays 100).

    Result? 14 out of 24 teams moved up a half-letter grade in fan loyalty. This seems to have had major effects on competitiveness for my 1970 season, but I'm also using a primitive Rule V draft and 12 percent revenue sharing. Hopefully, the bump in fan loyalty allows a shift in the AI that a) makes it more willing to spend the new money that revenue sharing gives it and b) makes it smart enough to use its Rule V acquisitions.

    However, I like the "reverse-to-first" use of fan loyalty that you've provided. I think that drops in fan loyalty should be more draconian for teams that do very well. A popular team like the Yankees or Red Sox should have a lot of "fair weather" fans who disappear whenever the team doesn't do well. However, every team should have a core of fans who will stay with it through thick and thin. The "reverse-to-first" system you've outlined comes close to capturing that effect.

    --Pet

  2. #377
    Imgran Guest

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    That would mean that my suggestion of an automatic fan loyalty modifier over in Suggestions and AI might actually work, even if I base it on market size rather than previous year's success.

  3. #378
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    PotatoofCouch: Yes, it seems to be working. Don't worry 'bout the math

    petrel: Yes, I remember you mentioning your idea before. ETB definitely looks like it's working things out. It's great to see!

    Imgran: Mm...yes and know. It will help. It will delay any problems. However, fan loyalty and market share will still destabilize things over time. I don't know if there's a way around that unfortunately.
    *******

    Early April 1972

    I'm bored.

    The offices in Kansas City are mostly quiet. Andy's busy helping Dale with Royals Stadium. I think he enjoys his relative autonomy, though I hope he doesn't try to take the project away from her. Marcie's rather upset about the whole thing. She's been snappish all week waiting for him to call.

    There's nothing to do. Bob Lemon and I know who's on our 25 man roster, but the League won't let me publish until this whole strike thing gets resolved. The players don't seem all that angry at me personally (unlike Milwaukee and Minnesota), so no one's protesting outside Municipal Stadium either. It just remains locked.

    Kuhn, Cronin, Feeney, and the most senior GMs of each league have agreed to meet with the Union. President Nixon wants them to see J. Curtis Counts, the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

    I finally told Marcie she could have the day off, shut things down and drove to Springfield. I'm not really sure why. I just wanted to talk to someone not on staff. Mom's finally getting involved in local senior activities, thank God. Gary's one of the senior NL GMs and so is in Washington.

    We agreed to meet at a small restaurant, the kind that was probably a drive thru back in the '50s with an open parking lot now half filled with tables and a 'bar' to take orders. I found a seat near the bar, looked over a menu that could have greased my car, and asked for a soda.

    Katrina showed up about fifteen minutes late. "Sorry," she said. "Class ran over. Actually not really, but the professor talks so fast it took me a minute to catch up with my notes." She dropped an overstuffed backpack, bulging at the seams. "What are you having?"

    "Haven't decided yet."

    She didn't need the menu. "Try the burgers if you like beef."

    "I thought they were supposed to be bad for you?"

    Kat grinned. "What isn't?"

    After a few minutes of light conversation it shifted towards my baseball woes. "Why are they striking?"

    "Money. What else?"

    She smiled. "Well, figure six or seven months of keeping yourself in top condition, only home half the time, travelling everywhere and taking a lot of criticism if you don't perform. I can see their point."

    "Maybe." I leaned forward. "Their wages have gone up 9% per year for the past few however. My highest paid playeris making about $252."

    "That's really not that much."

    "Thousand. 252 thousand."

    Her eyes widened. "Oh." As a first year intern, assuming no one bilked her too badly for being a woman, she could expect to make 7,000 to 7,500. "Um...may I ask how much you make?"

    "128."

    She whistled. "I am in the wrong business!"

    I smiled, then hid it behind the menu as a waitress came over with my soda. "Burger for me, and..."

    "The same, but with coffee." She leaned her head on one arm. "I have a lot of studying to do tonight."

    "How go the classes?"

    "Almost done, thank God." She squinted. "About a dozen labs and two exams should do it." She then began a long, technical discussion and I began thinking about Opening Day. If it ever came.

    "Sorry. I suppose that must be boring." She smiled and sipped her coffee.

    "Huh? Oh, no. No. I'm just not up on my Latin."

    Katrina laughed. "I could sign it out for you if you want."

    "Sign?" My eyes narrowed, thinking. "That deaf language?"

    "That deaf language? Yes, though they don't call it that." American Sign Language developed out of French and British versions in the mid-late 1800s. Suppressed for a long time in favor of attempts at oral communication (reading lips and the like), starting around 1950 it came back to life and gained wider acceptance. "It helped with some patients."

    "We use signs too," and I told her how the manager or coaches signalled batters and runners, and catchers worked with pitchers. Someone adept at using signs could be useful...someone adept at intercepting signs would be a treasure.

    I spent that night in a hotel, planning to drive back the next morning. I found a message waiting for me at the front desk. It was Andy.

    "Chuck? You need to get back here as soon as you can!"

    "I was planning to drive back tomorrow morning. What's wrong with the stadium?"

    "Nothing! However, Joe Cronin just called. I guess he couldn't find you, so he tracked Ewing down who phoned me. Opening Day is in two days!"
    Retired Dynasties I'm Proud of
    To Rule in Kansas City Part I and Part II (Kansas City Royals 1969-73, Hall of Fame)
    Cardinal Sins (St. Louis Cardinals 1976-78) and it's sequel:
    Diverting Destiny (Montreal Expos 1994)
    Script for my Requiem (New Orleans Blues (fictional) 1954)

  4. #379
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,438

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    Yes! No strike! Now it's time for Thompson to be the Opening Day hero! And it's so close too!

  5. #380
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    Coach Owens: Well, Thompson will get his chance. We open against the Athlet..er..A's!
    *******

    KANSAS CITY ROYALS

    OPENING DAY ROSTER
    POSITION PLAYERS


    CATCHER

    Ellie Rodriguez (79) [25] (.309 0-34 2)
    CON: $89K thruh 1973 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (7th Round)
    Debut: 1968 New York Yankees (4th season)

    Everything my instinct as a former director of player development says tells me I could do much better at catcher...and yet, Ellie's done anything we've ever asked of him. He's learned how to control a game and keep the pitchers under control. Decent bat too.

    Jerry Grote (77) [29] (.309 3-32 0)
    CON: $176K through 1975 / ACQ: 11/70 Free Agent
    Debut: 1963 Houston Colts (9th season)

    Unlike my expectations, Grote proved to be decent at the plate...but he managed to get hurt every other week. That kind of inconsistency is bad for the pitchers. I suppose we need to keep him for another season at least, but I'm disappointed.

    Omaha-A:
    Buck Martinez (76/95) [23] continues to slowly develop. He's reaching the point where Jack McKeon in Omaha can't do him any more good.
    *******

    FIRST BASE

    Will Thompson (93) [20] (.217 8-34 0)
    CON: $123K through 1973 / ACQ: 11/69 Free Agent
    Debut: 1970 Kansas City Royals (3rd season)

    After two disappointing performances, Thompson needs a good showing. He's 20, and many people think (hope) this will be his breakout year.

    Bob Oliver (81) [29] (.309 3-32 0)
    CON: $56K through 1973 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (10th Round)
    Debut: 1965 Pittsburgh Pirates (4th season)

    Oliver is..solid. He's had to watch a player nine years younger continually try to take his job away. That must be hard. He's not in the upper tier of first baseman, but watch for him to make a move if Will once more has trouble.

    Omaha-A:
    Mike Fiore (73) [27] will be our backup again this year. He's the only first baseman of any quality 'developing' in our minors. We may have to go looking for a 'spect before Mike decides to take his chances on the Rule V.
    *******

    INFIELD

    Mike Andrews (84) [28] (.269 5-40 1)
    CON: $240K through 1974 / ACQ: 11/70 Free Agent
    Debut: 1966 Boston Red Sox (7th season)

    Despite an early slump, Andrews did well enough last year to keep his position at second base. Now, can he hold it against rising star Frank White?

    Bill Russell (84/96) [23] (.345 0-16 3 with Dodgers/Royals)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 73 / ACQ: 06/71 trade with LAD
    Debut: 1969 Los Angeles Dodgers (4th season)

    Russell and Concepcion fought for the shortstop position late last season, and Bill's won. Concepcion might earn it back this year, but Bill's probably our SS of the future.

    Jim Ray Hart (88) [30] (.255 21-100 0)
    CON: $245K through 1973 / ACQ: 11/69 Free Agent
    Debut: 1963 San Francisco Giants (10th season)

    What I said last year goes for this as well: Great batter (though he may have lost a bit from two years ago), not so great fielder. Still the backbone of our offense.

    Dave Concepcion (83) [23] (.251 4-58 4)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 73 / ACQ: 07/69 Trade with CIN
    Debut: 1969 Cincinnati Reds (3rd season)

    Concepcion lost his spot to Russell after we traded for him in June. Generally a solid performer.

    Frank White (80/95) [21] (.273 0-6 0)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 75 / ACQ: Off Season 68/69
    Debut: 1969 Kansas City Royals (3rd season)

    White's waited patiently for his chance the last three years, showing up each September to showcase his improved play. Omaha can't help him anymore. It's time for him to show us what he can do.

    Omaha-A:
    Chico Salmon (79) [31] is naturally furious about being supplanted. He's good enough that the Rule V would benefit him, so unless Frank White really stumbles he's trade bait. Frank Duffy (74/76) [25] continues to slowly develop, but he's an afterthought.

    *******

    OUTFIELD

    Pat Kelly (88/94) [27] (.324 15-60 22)
    CON: $200K through 1973 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (17th round)
    Debut: 1967 Minnesota Twins (4th season)

    Pat's finally coming into his own. A strong fielder with a decent bat, Kelly's turned into one of the real leaders on the club.

    Jose Cardenal (88) [28] (.284 13-86 14)
    CON: $154K through 1973 / ACQ: 07/70 Trade with CLE
    Debut: 1963 San Francisco Giants (10th season)

    Cardenal's also stepped up his game, becoming one of our better and more reliable batters. He's not making my decision regarding Mays any easier. Nor should he.

    Bill Robinson (84) [28] (.305 22-93 11)
    CON: $252K through 1974 / ACQ: 07/71 Trade with CLE
    Debut: 1966 Atlanta Braves (7th season)

    We picked up Robinson last year to help our power, and he came through. Bob would have liked to start Lou Piniella, but I talked him out of it.

    Lou Piniella (81) [28] (.308 10-76 1 with Royals/Indians/Orioles)
    CON: $250K through 1973 / ACQ: 11/71 Free Agent
    Debut: 1964 Baltimore Orioles (4th season)

    After touring the league last year, Lou returns to KC with a hefty paycheck. He's a worthy backup.

    Willie Mays (81) [40] (.297 11-54 9 with Giants)
    CON: $221K through 1973 / ACQ: 11/71 Free Agent
    Debut: 1951 New York Giants (21st season)

    Mays was (and is) the hero for many boys growing up. Age and last year's injuries have taken their toll however. I'll do what I can for him, but he's just not really starter material anymore. It's sad to see his career end on the pine.

    Omaha-A:
    None. Two (Al Cowens and Jim Rice) in C-ball
    Retired Dynasties I'm Proud of
    To Rule in Kansas City Part I and Part II (Kansas City Royals 1969-73, Hall of Fame)
    Cardinal Sins (St. Louis Cardinals 1976-78) and it's sequel:
    Diverting Destiny (Montreal Expos 1994)
    Script for my Requiem (New Orleans Blues (fictional) 1954)

  6. #381
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    KANSAS CITY ROYALS

    OPENING DAY ROSTER
    PITCHERS



    STARTING ROTATION

    Paul Splittorff (92/93) [25] (7-2 3.09)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 73 / ACQ: 06/68 Amateur Draft (25th round)
    Debut: 1969 Kansas City Royals (4th season)

    Paul spent much of last season on the DL. He came back as strong as ever however.

    Bert Blyleven (89/94) [21] (17-8 3.35)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 73 / ACQ: 06/69 Amateur Draft (1st round)
    Debut: 1969 Kansas City Royals (4th season)

    Despite Bert's..problem..last year was his strongest by far. The AL strikeout leader for two seasons, he and Paul deliver a powerful 1-2 punch.

    Larry Dierker (87) [25] (12-11 4.19 3 CG)
    CON: $198K through 1972 / ACQ: 01/72 Trade with HOU
    Debut: 1964 Houston Colts (9th season)

    Larry debuted at the tender age of 17, and has been an Astro mainstay ever since. Pretty World Series ring and a WS MVP to back it up, but how will his success there translate to KC?

    Al Fitzmorris (84) [26] (11-6 4.44 3 CG)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 73 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (20th round)
    Debut: 1969 Kansas City Royals (4th season)

    Al's proven reliable (if not brilliant) in the starting role. He'll duel Rooker for the 4 slot all season.

    Jim Rooker (84) [29] (11-9 5.14)
    CON: $125K through 1972 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (3rd round)
    Debut: 1968 Detroit Tigers (4th season)

    Last year fate saved Rooker fromt he 5 slot. This time he's on his own unless there's an injury or Al Fitzmorris buckles.

    Omaha-A:
    Monty Montgomery (77/79) [25] just isn't good enough to break into the roster. He had his chance last year and it wasn't good enough. Wally Bunker (81/82) [27] had a bad winter. Maybe he can regain some of his form in Omaha, but it's not looking good. Steve Busby (82/91) [22] is really at the point where Jack McKeon can't help him, and I need to find room.

    BULLPEN

    Mike Hedlund (83/87) [25] (3-4 2.45 3 SV)
    CON: $105K through 1972 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (23rd round)
    Debut: 1965 Cleveland Indians (4th season)

    Mike had a lukewarm year, putting together some brilliant performances and some... not so brilliant. Bob wants to see how he does as closer.

    Jim York (84/88) [24] (6-8 4.35 4 SV)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 74 / ACQ: Off Season 68/69
    Debut: 1970 Kansas City Royals (3rd season)

    [i]Jim continues to have his great and..not so great..moments as well. Despite his ERA he's solid however, and will continue as setup.

    Rollie Fingers (84/85) [25] (5-7 4.54 15 SV)
    CON: $92K through 1973 / ACQ: 07/70 trade with OAK
    Debut: 1968 Oakland Athletics (4th season)

    Rollie's struggled enough that trying another closer makes sense. He'll continue in short relief. He's thrilled.

    Dick Drago (80/90) [26] (2-1 2.26 3 SV)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 73 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (16th round)
    Debut: 1969 Kansas City Royals (4th season)

    Dick did really well last year. Good enough to move him into a short relief role despite his strong endurance, where hopefully he can shut opponents down through games that matter more.

    Ken Wright (83/84) [25] (3-3 6.11 1 SV)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 73 / ACQ: Off Season 68/69
    Debut: 1969 Kansas City Royals (4th season)

    Ken's performance has really fallen off over the last two years. This may be as good as he gets, in which case he just won't last.

    Bill Butler (84/85) [25] (4-8 4.26 1 CG)
    CON: $18.3K through Arb 74 / ACQ: 10/68 Expansion Draft (11th round)
    Debut: 1969 Kansas City Royals (4th season)

    Butler is a solid pitcher. With just a little shuffling he might end up in the starting rotation where he belongs, though again I have to find room for Busby at some point soon. He starts in long relief, more for spot starting than anything.

    Omaha-A:
    Aurelio Lopez (76/79) continues to develop. He put together some good numbers last year. Lance Clemons (79/92) is at the point where the bigs would benefit him. Jerry Cram (77/93) started last year, but will be okay in Omaha a little while longer. Doug Bird (71/83) continues to develop.
    Retired Dynasties I'm Proud of
    To Rule in Kansas City Part I and Part II (Kansas City Royals 1969-73, Hall of Fame)
    Cardinal Sins (St. Louis Cardinals 1976-78) and it's sequel:
    Diverting Destiny (Montreal Expos 1994)
    Script for my Requiem (New Orleans Blues (fictional) 1954)

  7. #382
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cowcrap Town
    Posts
    5,894

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    Boy when these guys reach their full potential, watch out..as it is, watch out for them now. Bert Be home by 11 will win the Cy.
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I'm an idiot

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    lern 2 english

  8. #383
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    ragecage: I hope so! We have good potential, but the overall power level in this league is pretty high. The following are the average overall ratings of the starting fielders:

    C 83, 1B 88, 2B 84, 3B 86, SS 83, OF 89/88/88. Pitchers are harder to judge, but having two in the 90s isn't that uncommon.
    *******

    The Day Before...


    The Basic Agreement between the MLBPA and Major League Baseball (representing the American and National Leagues of Professional Baseball Clubs) changed very little, but it formalized a lot.

    The reserve clause, very rarely enforced since the 1950s, would now disappear entirely. We agreed to take it out of future contracts, and it would expire naturally over the next few years as players came up for renewal.

    Arbitration, up until now a 'good idea,' now became a right of young players with three (or in some rare cases two) years of Major League experience. Said player may not refuse to go to arbitration however: In other words, the club has the right to attempt to get six years out of their prospect.

    After six years the player may opt for free agency and refuse to negotiate with a club.

    Future changes in the minimum salary (and thus rippling to all contracts) would be tied to inflation, plus a low (1-4) percentage based on the state of the game. This change would be arbitrated each year. Though labor made several unhappy noises about this, in truth I think they're pleased: Inflation the past two years has run about 6-7%, so they'll get their regular raises.

    The owners would pay $500,000 more into the players' pension fund: $20,000 for each team, plus a $10,000 penalty to Milwaukee and Minnesota for releasing their player representatives. Further, both clubs had to resign their reps.

    (I determine who a club's rep (and captain) is by totaling the number of years they've been with the team, then (if that's at least 1) adding the number of awards they've received. Very crude, but I figured it would be a good measure of who's earned everyone's respect. I released Milwaukee and Minnesota's. Within days both teams signed them right back.)

    The players seemed satisfied at practice today. Actually, most seemed relieved this didn't turn into something serious.

    Joe Cronin announced (and Feeney followed for the Nationals) that no lost games would be made up. They argued it would be too hard to fit into the schedule. In truth, this is a subtle strike at the players' union: Their members just lost about 5% of their salary.

    This means the Royals will only play 154 games this year. Other teams vary between 153 and 156.
    *******

    I just received a scouting report from the A's training camp. Of interest (or amusement):


    "THE EMU" - No other name given.
    Assignment: Unassigned. Probable D-Coos Bay
    Contract: Standard minor league
    Position: RF (2)

    Born: July 28, 1965 (1)
    Location: Brisbane, Australia (1)
    Height: 6'6"
    Weight: 195 (1)

    (1) - Source: A's Minor League Contract
    (2) - Source: A's Minor League Roster

    * Has trainer. Controlled by voice command.
    * Very fast in a straight line (third to home). Does not yet understand rounding bases.
    * Cannot hit. CAN hold bat.
    * Not bad at fielding fly balls or grounders. Cannot throw.
    * Shows no understanding of rules of game.
    * Eats alot. Likes baseball caps.
    * VERY temperamental. Catcher Gene Tenace tried to stop it from crossing plate. Emu ran him over. Tenace on A's 60-day DL.

    * Ratings (2-8): All Batting (2), Speed (8+), All Throwing (2-), Fielding (4), Health (?)
    * Analysis: It's a freaking bird!

    *******

    April 10, 1971

    And so the season began a little later than usual, but here we were at last: Opening Day. In Oakland. A capacity crowd greeted us with hearty roars. Very little signs of their being upset the season had been delayed or would be cut short, though one of the Oakland papers did rumble that the shorter the season, the more luck played a role in who won.

    Not good if you're building a dynasty, I guess.

    The Cat, Catfish Hunter, took the mound sporting his Series ring. In fact, all the A's players wore their rings. I thought it hubris - an unbearable show of arrogance - but it wasn't their idea. Charlie Finley thought the fans would like it.

    Who the h*** is looking at their ring fingers!?

    I'm told he had each A's ring has "S.S.S." inscribes on it. It's supposed to mean 'Sweat plus Sacrifice equals Success." The players are telling their fellows it means "S*** plus S*** equals more S***."

    Hunter took us down in order in the first. We answered with Paul Splittorff, who did well after recovering from his injury last year. Splittorff allowed a single with one out, but two routine pops ended any Oakland ambitions.

    The Cat took us down in the second. George Hendrick opened the Oakland half with a shot down the left field line that he stretched into a triple. A towering fly out to center led Hendrick to tag up, but Cardenal fired a rifle that Rodriguez caught a split second before colliding with the A. This saved us a run, as Mickey Stanley then hit a single, but another routine pop out stranded him.

    Mike Andrews singled to start the third, but two strike outs and fly to center stranded him. Paul shut down the bottom of Oakland's order.

    Bill Robinson doubled to deep center with one out in the fourth, then scored on Jose Cardenal's single to give us a 1-0 lead. We couldn't bring Cardenal in though, and Rick Monday immediately retaliated with a homer over the center field fence to tie us at one after four.

    Andrews singled to start the fifth, but Thompson hit into a 5-4-3 double play and Splittorff struck out. Paul made up for it by retiring the A's in order.

    Cat did the same to the top of our order, then Bert Campaneris opened the bottom of the sixth with a single. He stole second, then came home on Sal Bando's double. One out later Monday hit a towering shot to right center for his second homer putting Oakland up 4-1.

    We fell in the seventh. Bob Lemon then brought in Dick Drago to pitch to Oakland, and Drago retired them as well.

    Lou Piniella, PH for Drago, tripled down the right field line with two outs in the eight, but Pat Kelly struck out. In hindsight, Bob should have let Drago stay in, for now he turned to Jim York. York didn't last the inning: With one out Bando and Joe Rudi singled, Monday doubled to score one, and this time it was George Hendrick's turn to hit a homer. One out later Stanley singled, and Lemon turned to Ken Wright who finally ended the disastrous inning.

    Down by seven, our lineup didn't even really try in the ninth. Strikeout. Grounder to first. Strikeout. When the dust cleared Cat struck out 11.

    Oakland A's 8, Kansas City Royals 1
    WP: Catfish Hunter (CG), LP: Paul Splittorff, HR: (OAK) Rick Monday (2), George Hendrick (1)

    Thompson went 0 for 3 with 2 strikeouts and a double play grounder. Maybe the home opener would go better.
    Retired Dynasties I'm Proud of
    To Rule in Kansas City Part I and Part II (Kansas City Royals 1969-73, Hall of Fame)
    Cardinal Sins (St. Louis Cardinals 1976-78) and it's sequel:
    Diverting Destiny (Montreal Expos 1994)
    Script for my Requiem (New Orleans Blues (fictional) 1954)

  9. #384
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,803

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    "S. S. S.?"

    That was funny. -- Pet

  10. #385
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    5,684

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    It looks like the 1973 offseason won't be fun, especially on Ewing's wallet with all those contracts coming up.
    Active Dynasty
    Meeting Success: A New Regime - Follow us as etothep chronicles me and eddie's efforts to bring a championship back to Queens

    Paused Dynasties
    The Goose continues the Hawk's battle for Capital Hill
    Une Rève Réaliser: Les Expos de Montréal (1969-)

    Retired Dynasties
    The San Diego Padres, into a Friar Destiny (with Jeffy25 and Ragecage)
    A New Era Takes Flight - The 2008 Toronto Blue Jays
    The Blue Birds: A new Era

  11. #386
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,438

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    I liked this from Emu's scouting report,

    "Shows no understanding of rules of game."

    Good one, Cat!

  12. #387
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    petrel: And true! Some stuff you can't make up

    gosensgo: I'm sure though the computer SAYS Arb 73, some of those deals will come up this year. I'm way over payroll and will have to start cutting dead weight soon.

    Coach Owens: Speaking of which...er...I mean yeah! I liked preparing the Emu report. I noticed the A's had lost Tenace for 60 days and thought it'd be a fun explanation
    *******

    Mid April 1972


    While preparing for our home opener, (Oakland swept us. B*******!) Jose Cardenal knocked on my office door. "Boss, you got a minute?"

    Players don't come to me that often, not unless there's something they can't tell Bob. After all, part of his job is to liasion between them and the front office. I nodded and waved at a chair. Jose's contract wasn't up until next year. "What can I do for you?"

    "I already talked to Bob about it, and he said he was okay with it but that I needed your okay. It's about Willie. I'd like to see him play."

    "So would I, but I don't see where we can....No! He's not replacing you. Jose, you're one of my best players." Not something to be telling someone you'll be negotiating with next year, but by then maybe he'll forget.

    "Yes, but he's Willie Mays! He can do so much for the team. For the city. For black men everywhere. Anyway, I am not saying he should replace me all the time."

    "Then what...a platoon?"

    "Sort of. Pat and Bill are on board with me on this. Willie plays center, and we three trade off sitting on the bench for a week or two at a time. Then Willie sits for a week or two and we start over. That way everyone gets to play most of the season."

    Four players, three positions...averaged out to 121.5 games. Acceptable. "And Lou?"

    "Lou is not a starter," Cardenal said flatly. His tone surprised me. Last I checked, Lou Piniella was popular with his teammates.

    "Well, I'll need Pat Kelly and Bill Robinson to confirm it's okay with them. If so, then I'd say Bob can do what he thinks best for the team."

    Cardenal grinned. "Gracias."
    *******

    Kansas City (0-0) at Oakland (0-0)

    10: A close 1-1 game until the sixth when Splittorff tires, and reliever Jim York can't pitch a full inning. A's 8-1
    LP: Splittorff (0-1)

    11: Apparently our offense hasn't come in from spring training yet, and Blyleven gives up 4 ER in 4 IP. A's 8-0
    LP: Blyleven (0-1)
    *******

    What a great way to begin the season! We run home to greet the BoSox.
    *******

    Boston (1-1) (2nd-T, -0.5g) at Kansas City (0-2) (6th, -2g)

    12: Willie gets his first start, going 1 for 3 with a walk and stolen base. We triple our run production for the year, but Dierker does worse than Blyleven. Red Sox 8-2
    LP: Dierker (0-1)

    13: Finally our offense shows up! Unfortunately, our pitching is still MIA and this could be a very long season. Robinson leads the way going 4 for 6 with 4 RBI. Boston scores 2 in the 10th. Kelly retaliated with a solo shot, but that's not quite enough. Red Sox 10-9 (10)
    LP: Hedlund (0-1), HR: Kelly (1), Robinson (1)

    14: Our pitching can't catch a break as Splittorff stinks..again. Robinson and Kelly are the only ones producing for us. Red Sox 8-4
    LP: Splittorff (0-2), HR: Robinson (2)
    *******

    Jim Ray Hart's out for about a month with a torn quadricep. He won't tell anyone how it happened, except that it was off field. Some sort of fun no doubt. Concepcion filled in for two games above, but after the trades below there's a new man in town.
    *******

    Gary offered me a very...interesting trade. The kind that makes you go hmm. I went over the numbers. It, frankly, blows our budget to ****...but it points out where to go if I want to dump payroll. I already knew some of the answers.

    After some thought I pulled the trigger.

    KC to STL:
    RP Randy Wiles (62/90) [20] may be great someday. Gary's investing in the future here.
    SS Dave Concepcion (83) [23] (.251 4-58 4 in 1971). Dave was filling in for Jim Ray Hart. This opens up the backup shortstop position for when Roy Smalley is ready.
    1B/OF Bob Oliver (81) [29] (.199 10-35 0 in 1971). Oliver would never be happy constantly seeing Thompson in front of him. Maybe this helps his prospects.

    STL to KC:
    SP Mike Torrez (86) [25] (11-13 5.50 3 CG in 1971). Mike will take over the #4 role. It's time to start moving...starters.
    C Joe Torre (89) [31] (.286 18-87 1 in 1971). Torre will take over behind the plate. I've admired him since before I came to KC. I expect Ellie to be upset...I can't help that. Plus, Torre can play first if Thompson can't get his act together.

    On the Cards' side, Concepcion and Oliver sit on THEIR bench, while Wiles goes to C-ball.
    *******

    Frankly there's no reason to wait. I'd already decided I was going to get rid of two starters and Salmon. Now it's three starters: Bunker, who's fading and expensive, and now Fitzmorris and Rooker are both expendable. Torrez SHOULD be better, and I need to make room for Busby.

    We need a backup third baseman, and so...

    KC to MIN:
    SP Jim Rooker (84) [29] (11-9 5.14 2 CG in 1971)
    SP Al Fitzmorris (84) [26] (11-6 4.44 3 CG in 1971)

    MIN to KC:
    3B Eric Soderholm (83/93) [23] (.234 20-72 3 in 1971)

    We dump $100,000 in payroll, and Minnesota pays us $90,000 for the privilege.

    Soderholm goes to our bench (filling in until Hart is better.) Fitz becames their ace! Rooker goes to MR.
    *******

    Oakland (4-1) (1st-T, +0g) at Kansas City (0-5) (6th, -4g)

    15: All our trades don't do us any good. What's wrong with our starters? I wonder if Andy is doping them again. Thompson leads our attempt going 2 for 4 with a homer. A's 10-4
    LP: Blyleven (0-2), HR: Thompson (1)

    16: Finally! A 4 run 8th led by Cardenal's 3-run blast allows us to inch past the division leaders. Royals 5-4
    WP: York (1-0), HR: Cardenal (1)

    17: It's our new starter, Mike Torrez, who puts together our first solid pitching performance of 1972! Unfortunately Blue Moon Odom is better, holding us to 3 hits in 8 innings. Soderholm had our only RBI. A's 2-1
    LP: Torrez (0-2)
    *******

    American League West

    Code:
    Team          W   L   GB
    Oakland       6   2   --
    Los Angeles   6   2   --
    Milwaukee     4   4    2
    Minnesota     4   4    2
    Seattle       3   5    3
    Kansas City   1   7    5
    AL East: Detroit (6-2), Boston (-1g), Washington (-1.5g)
    NL East: Chicago (6-2), St. Louis (-1.5g), New York (-2g)
    NL West: Cincinnati (7-1), Los Angeles (-0.5g), San Francisco (-1.5g)
    Last edited by CatKnight; 04-22-2008 at 02:58 PM.
    Retired Dynasties I'm Proud of
    To Rule in Kansas City Part I and Part II (Kansas City Royals 1969-73, Hall of Fame)
    Cardinal Sins (St. Louis Cardinals 1976-78) and it's sequel:
    Diverting Destiny (Montreal Expos 1994)
    Script for my Requiem (New Orleans Blues (fictional) 1954)

  13. #388
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cowcrap Town
    Posts
    5,894

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    A slow start, but stay patient and they will turn it around.
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I'm an idiot

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    lern 2 english

  14. #389
    Imgran Guest

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    Take a look at your defense and check both your lineup v/L and lineup v/Rfor anything particularly stupid. If nothing seems out of place I guess there wouldn't be anything to do but wait for your guys play up to their potential.

  15. #390
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    5,684

    Re: To Rule in Kansas City

    You're not off to a very good start.

    A couple of nice trades. Dealt some depth for needs. Soderholm gives you a change to shed Hart's salary if need be.

    How many HRs does Mays have at the moment?
    Active Dynasty
    Meeting Success: A New Regime - Follow us as etothep chronicles me and eddie's efforts to bring a championship back to Queens

    Paused Dynasties
    The Goose continues the Hawk's battle for Capital Hill
    Une Rève Réaliser: Les Expos de Montréal (1969-)

    Retired Dynasties
    The San Diego Padres, into a Friar Destiny (with Jeffy25 and Ragecage)
    A New Era Takes Flight - The 2008 Toronto Blue Jays
    The Blue Birds: A new Era

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •