View Poll Results: Is Clemons just as bad as Bonds, agree or disagree?

Voters
39. You may not vote on this poll
  • I agree, pitchers using PEDs is equally bad as hitters

    25 64.10%
  • I disagree, pitchers using PEDs have to out of necessity

    2 5.13%
  • I disagree, pitchers using PEDs doesn't help them as much as hitters

    0 0%
  • I am sick of PED polls

    12 30.77%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 46 to 51 of 51

Thread: Clemens is no different than Bonds

  1. #46
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Jackson,TN
    Posts
    1,090

    Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds

    I love those little dispensers.
    The candy is pretty good too.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds

    Well yes.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Exciting Leduc, Alberta!
    Posts
    6,195

    Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds

    I've never been a real big fan of Clemens, anyway, because he comes off as an entitled whiner, so this has hardly changed my opinion of him.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    83

    Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds

    Personally I think we have to be careful about the assumptions we make with steroid allegations.

    If we get too carried away Roger Maris sure looks like a cheater and Nolan Ryan throwing harder than everyone for so long starts to look mighty suspicious.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds

    As does Davey Johnson jumping from 5 to 43 home runs.

    And Hank Aaron having his best season at age 37.

    And countless other fluke seasons, or "freaks of nature" like Nolan Ryan.

    That is why it is silly to start accusing players based on their statistics. Statistical flukes have happened since baseball became a game, and sometimes, they're just that - flukes.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    83

    Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds

    That's why I have such a big problem with what's going.

    It's not that I don't think players cheated. I have little doubt they did.

    My bigger problem is that this "great case" essentially comes down to NY area "witnesses" who have little proof other than their word and what they said under the threat of jail time.

    Unless the report had more substantial proof (and I use the standard of a case being able to hold up in court), I think it is VERY dangerous to go down this kind of road.

    Forgetting for a minute that these are high profile people, imagine if this was acceptable in your own line of work. I work in Public Relations and if my reputation could be shot down by two reporters I've worked with, I'd never be able to stay in my profession.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •