The players named in the report did not necessarily all take PED's. The evidence against some of them is completely hearsay and very flimsy.
I don't see where tapey1brad said that it didn't have a huge effect, just that, it was a waste of time and has a negative effect.but I disagree about the effect it has on the history or baseball. I think it has a huge effect.
If you don't believe that records have always been being tainted in someway by cheating, throughout history,than you're fooling yourself.The record books are tainted.
Why do steroids taint the record books more than amphetamines?
They're looking into the steroid mess. Punishments now exist. How is that saying "It's okay to cheat." Maybe 10 years ago that was the message being given out, you know, when the MLB willingly turned a blind eye to steroid use...but not now.Even if you put an asterisk next to every players name, it's still putting out the message to children that it is okay to cheat.
Stark's view is actually rather accurate. The evidence against a lot of the players is extremely flimsy and would not hold up in court, yet we're taking everything in the report has 100% fact, and it may not, necessarily, be completley true.Btw, great job at parroting the latest sports pundit to weight in on the subject. You should probably read some dissenting view other than Jayson Stark about the debacle.





Reply With Quote


