Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 123

Thread: Mitchell report due today

  1. #91
    robinhoodnik Guest

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    I'll search the forum for that when I get home later and see if we can put some context to it or what not.
    You do that.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    /ˈskędʒɨt/
    Posts
    4,469

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by robinhoodnik View Post
    Some time ago you had a nearly allergic reaction when I stated that Donnelley was a steroid user. Well, I still can't remember where I got that information then, but, well, I'm not calling you ill informed but......
    http://forum.sportsmogul.com/showthr...997#post844997

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Exciting Leduc, Alberta!
    Posts
    6,195

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    One thing that was brought up that I found interesting was Mitchell's statement during the presser that they had uncovered numerous examples of players being warned beforehand of their impending 'random' drug test. I mean, it's something that has long been suspected of happening in every sport for a long time, but finally there appears to be some proof of it occurring.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Thanks.

    Robin, you said that Donnelly got caught using steroids. At the time, I searched, and found no mention of him being caught, which is why I said that I found no such evidence, and asked you if you could provide me with any. And, you said that you couldn't find any, and don't know where you got the impression that he got caught.

    I don't see how I had an "allergic reaction." I just said that I found no evidence to your claim, and, you couldn't provide any either. It is certainly interesting though that you had somewhere heard this, and despite not remembering where, it turns out to likely be true.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by FRENCHREDSOX View Post
    The problem is Androstenedione is a steroid,although as stated a legal one at the time of McGwire's HR season,but also & this is where the problem lies,is it could have been a "masking agent".Like Drug dealers used Coffee beans to mask cocaine shipments from DEA dogs,Andro in the '90's could/was used to mask other products.

    McGwire was also a known associate of steriod dealer Curtis Wenzlaff who was "busted" in MAY 1992 (or 6 years before his andro jar incident)
    None of that matters. All we know about McGwire was that he had andro in his locker. That's it. Saying that he used it as a masking agent, or that he had associated with a steroid dealer and then further saying that because of that he did steroids...it's all assumptions. And I'm sorry, but I don't believe in punishing people based on assumptions.

  6. #96
    FRENCHREDSOX Guest

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    None of that matters. All we know about McGwire was that he had andro in his locker. That's it. Saying that he used it as a masking agent, or that he had associated with a steroid dealer and then further saying that because of that he did steroids...it's all assumptions. And I'm sorry, but I don't believe in punishing people based on assumptions.
    That's a joke right ?? You also conveniantly forget the "biggie" ---- his answers or should I say non-answers,under oath,to the congressional hearing !

    LOL,under the circumstances,of how MLB drug testing is done (or to be precise not done) his actual association with dealers,users,his usage of a STEROID (as andro is one),testimony (although not under oath) by various sources means these are not assumptions but facts.Just because he has not been indited (but how many actual known users have ?) does not mean he did not use other steroids.....

    Again remember,Andro is a steroid,a legal steroid at the time but still a steroid & post dated banned by the FDA & MLB.Just because X or Y is not listed at the time (ie 1990 ACT) does not mean it is not a banned substance--- TGH,EPO or HGH in 1990 were non listed & have been banned since because either 1) they were non commercially existant or 2) actually were non traceable or even known about - heck "cream" & "clear" were invented after 1990 & still aren't "officially" steroids as they have never been sold on the market or even been prescribed by M.D's.

    Re-Read the link,first line:
    Androstenedione (also known as 4-androstenedione) is a 19-carbon steroid hormone
    Ipso facto,McGwire did steroids!

  7. #97
    robinhoodnik Guest

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    Thanks.


    I don't see how I had an "allergic reaction."
    I'm not accusing you of lying, but can you show me where he was caught using 'roids?
    Maybe it's that little "I'm not accusing you of lying, but...." bit?

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Edison, NJ
    Posts
    15,636

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    I hope that the three of you realize that you're driving people away (at least from participating) with this garbage.
    You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    3

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by ohms_law View Post
    I hope that the three of you realize that you're driving people away (at least from participating) with this garbage.
    What are you talking about?

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Victoria B.C. Canada
    Posts
    16,722

    Unhappy Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by boomboom View Post
    What are you talking about?
    An unpleasantly personal tone seems to be seeping into the debate.
    "Whate'er should be our Zodiac's star
    We all are born to make or mar.
    To each is gi'en a bag of tools
    Some mentors, and a set of rules:
    And each must carve, ere life has flown,
    A stumbling block, or a stepping-stone"

    (Author unknown)

    Generation 35.

    "Spikes" The cleats on baseball boots
    "Spikes" On which newspaper editors impale copy for future reference, or ultimate destruction.

  11. #101
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Well we are talking about steroids in baseball and that always seems to go this route.

  12. #102
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Victoria B.C. Canada
    Posts
    16,722

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by RickD View Post
    Well we are talking about steroids in baseball and that always seems to go this route.
    I regard steroid-taking as akin to Popeye knocking off a can of spinach, ere he beats up on Bluto
    "Whate'er should be our Zodiac's star
    We all are born to make or mar.
    To each is gi'en a bag of tools
    Some mentors, and a set of rules:
    And each must carve, ere life has flown,
    A stumbling block, or a stepping-stone"

    (Author unknown)

    Generation 35.

    "Spikes" The cleats on baseball boots
    "Spikes" On which newspaper editors impale copy for future reference, or ultimate destruction.

  13. #103
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by robinhoodnik View Post
    Maybe it's that little "I'm not accusing you of lying, but...." bit?
    That was just to make sure you didn't think I was calling you a liar, because I wasnt..

    FRENCHREDSOX, sorry I didn't specify. I just thought it was quite clear that when I said "steroids" I was talking about illegal steroids that are against the rules.

    Every player has done "steroids" because there are tons of legal steroids that all ballplayers take at one point or another, like cortisone, but I just figured that while we're discussing this topic, saying that a player did steroids is referring to a player taking steroids that are against the law/rules.

    Quote Originally Posted by FRENCHREDSOX
    Just because he has not been indited (but how many actual known users have ?) does not mean he did not use other steroids.....
    And just because he knows a steroid dealer, and because he refused to answer questions about the past, does not mean he did illegal steroids. We don't know what he used. All we KNOW is that he used a legal substance that was not against the rules.

  14. #104
    robinhoodnik Guest

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by ohms_law View Post
    I hope that the three of you realize that you're driving people away (at least from participating) with this garbage.
    We're driving people away? LMAO!

  15. #105
    robinhoodnik Guest

    Re: Mitchell report due today

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonGM View Post
    That was just to make sure you didn't think I was calling you a liar, because I wasnt..
    In the future then, when someone makes a statement, worded in that manner, it does mean you're calling someone something.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •