Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6
Results 76 to 83 of 83

Thread: barry mad at hall of fame

  1. #76
    robinhoodnik Guest

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    Anyhow, will Barry see the doors shut on him after the first ballot? How long will the writers make him wait if at all?

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Edison, NJ
    Posts
    15,636

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    Quote Originally Posted by robinhoodnik View Post
    Look, I've spoken to bodybuilders, have some in my family, read a lot of the reports. They all tell me that Andro isn't going to make you look like Mac did. That's the result of steroid abuse. These guys know what they're talking about, because some of them did the stuff too.
    Pure speculation. You're obviously free to believe whatever you wish, but I personally wouldn't take the word of a body builder, professional or not, as being truly "expert" (with the obvious exception of those who happen to have a medical degree). There's just to much going on with steroids and the human body for anyone but real experts to carry any real weight on this subject, in my opinion. Even those who actively develop steroids and study their effects can't seem to predict their effect on individuals. Just like most drugs.
    Quote Originally Posted by robinhoodnik View Post
    Anyhow, will Barry see the doors shut on him after the first ballot? How long will the writers make him wait if at all?
    ...man, who knows. Big Mac is basically the test case for all of this, and that's only just begun to play out.
    You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann

  3. #78
    robinhoodnik Guest

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    Quote Originally Posted by ohms_law View Post
    Pure speculation. You're obviously free to believe whatever you wish, but I personally wouldn't take the word of a body builder, professional or not, as being truly "expert" (with the obvious exception of those who happen to have a medical degree). There's just to much going on with steroids and the human body for anyone but real experts to carry any real weight on this subject, in my opinion. Even those who actively develop steroids and study their effects can't seem to predict their effect on individuals. Just like most drugs.

    ...man, who knows. Big Mac is basically the test case for all of this, and that's only just begun to play out.
    Yep, going to the source is always pure speculation....

    Think they'll let Mark in this time, or hold him back again?

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Edison, NJ
    Posts
    15,636

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    I think so...
    You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    I think so and I hope so!

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    2,861

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    Oh God, the players voting would be horrible. Fans....maybe, though I'd extend the 5 year post-retirement limit to ten years then. I agree the current system needs repairing.

    As for Herr Bonds...if he wants to be a whiny cry-baby, then he doesn't have to go.

    I find the idea of adding an asterisk to the ball rather amusing....I can see why it would bother him, but too bad. It's not his call. As I understand it, the ball's owner made the ball's being marked a condition of giving it to Cooperstown.

  7. #82
    robinhoodnik Guest

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    I would have got a red hot branding iron and asterisked that baby. That'd never come off.

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: barry mad at hall of fame

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...2&sportCat=mlb

    Great article on this issue, especially:
    You would think the HOF would be appalled by this, but it seems eager to be used, foolishly believing having the ball outweighs the contamination of history. It sounds like a mistress excited because her married man spends Columbus Day with her instead of Christmas.

    "We don't believe in defacing artifacts," said Jeff Idelson, the HOF's vice president for communications and education. "In this one instance, we're willing to look beyond it."

    What will the HOF do if the feds never gain enough evidence to file charges against Bonds? Use Wite-Out to cover up the asterisk? The HOF's job is to preserve historical artifacts, and right now, no one has proved that Bonds took performance enhancers.

    Think of the dangerous precedent this sets. Does that mean if P Diddy gets his hands on the next record-setting home run ball he can stamp "Sean John" on it before turning it in? Would the Hall be willing to accept a historic Ty Cobb cap with the word "racist" written on it? Would the Hall accept a historic Mickey Mantle uniform that says "alcoholic," "bad father" and "prescription painkiller addict"?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •