Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Have Pitchers become more fragile?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    3

    Have Pitchers become more fragile?

    Interesting stuff here, What I would really like to see is pitches thrown, if that has gone up or down at all...

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/ar...-more-fragile/

    Have pitchers become more fragile?
    We can easily define some rough eras in terms of pitcher usage:


    * 1871-1892, when pitchers were regularly throwing over 600 innings a year.

    * 1893-1900, a period of steep decline, bottoming out in 1900 when Joe McGinnity led the National League with “just” 343 innings pitched.

    * 1901-1917, which saw a few 400-inning pitchers and league leaders regularly approaching that number.

    * 1918-1956, when the league leader in innings averaged a little over 300 innings pitched.

    * 1957-1961, a five-year period in which no one threw even 300 innings.

    * 1962-1979, when 300-plus innings seasons came back into fashion.

    * 1980-2007, a period of slow but steady decline in innings pitched.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    440

    Re: Have Pitchers become more fragile?

    This decline in innings pitched coincides pretty well with a startling inflation in baseball salaries. Perhaps as teams have invested more and more in pitchers, managers have been pressured to push them less, as injuries become costlier.

    As run scoring has increased, perhaps innings have become longer, increasing the number of pitches thrown per innings and decreasing total innings pitched per start.

    Or perhaps, just maybe, as hitters have improved, it has become tougher to be a pitcher. Each pitch requires more exertion and a pitcher’s best stuff can’t be saved for the opposing team’s best slugger because even the shortstop can hit the ball out of the park.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    God, the world is coming to an end - I agree with those conclusions.
    Water brings life to all, or can end it on a whim.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    44,491

    Re: Have Pitchers become more fragile?

    I read this article this morning and was actually going to post it here, but you beat me to it!

    Great read and interesting conclusions, although as he said, there's still more work to be done.

  4. #4
    shepster Guest

    Re: Have Pitchers become more fragile?

    Hang nails and itchy fingers seam to be of a problem in MLB lately.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,029

    Re: Have Pitchers become more fragile?

    They aren't more fragile, they're more protected.
    Active Dynasty
    An Alternate History Dynasty - The 1989 Red Sox

    Paused Dynasty
    Fishing for Wins - A Florida Marlins Dynasty

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Ryan is No. 0. He doesn't make the list, since he's clearly on a higher plane of existence than all other quarterbacks, living or dead. He is ... teh messiah.
    I'm not the only one who knows the truth about Matt Ryan.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,756

    Re: Have Pitchers become more fragile?

    Today's pitchers are wimps compared to the durability and strength of the pitchers of old.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •