Just having it for free - yes. Paying for it and having less overall team talent because your entire budget goes to one stud - no.Originally Posted by JavaJiver
Who wants an MVP caliber player on their team?
Banned
Just having it for free - yes. Paying for it and having less overall team talent because your entire budget goes to one stud - no.Who wants an MVP caliber player on their team?
Water brings life to all, or can end it on a whim.
Registered User
agree.
I'd start at maybe six good years. If he can avoid all of the aches and pains that'll really be starting in on him soon, there's still the dropoff in eyesight and reflexes that nearly every hitter succumbs to eventually.
Registered User
This is a little late to the thread but, as a Giants fan, I sure hope not on either of the latter two. If he goes to the Dodgers, he will have a pristine end to his career and it will be **** to the Giants. If he goes to the Giants, he'll be injured the rest of his career and be almost as worthless as Zito. Either way, the Giants losemets? dodgers? Giants?
E=I*R
lol
Not too pessimistic, are we?
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
Well, considering that the last time the Giants won it all they were in NYC...........lol
Not too pessimistic, are we?
E=I*R
Now there's a shot across the bow...
hehe
You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can always make a machine which will do just that! -J. von Neumann
Registered User
Nope, no pessimism here. I would tend to call it realism.... or the luck of the Giants.
Registered User
True, but there are some teams that can pay A-Rod what Boros wants him to get and still pay the other 24 guys plenty. Exactly how many teams can do that is hard to tell. I'm guessing it's more teams than most people think.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote